Similar Posts

11 Comments

  1. Catherine:

    You stated: “The difference is a bit like being the CEO as Europe with your largest shareholders vs being a member of a committee with Europe money having the controlling votes.”

    I noticed a couple of years ago that the New York Stock Exchange merged with Euronext(officially on 4/4/2007), creating the worlds first “global stock exchange” and not many people paid attention. It was obvious to me, ever since the introduction of the Euro that something was afoot – to merge the two economies(more officially of course). Also the strengthening of NATO with the reintroduction of France as a supporting member obviously shows that there is an agenda. However – these seem to just be technicalities in what has been a steady process. Why do people get all up in arms now that this is “official”?

    For all the talk of oversight and regulation, it will still be the fox guarding the chicken coup.
    Let’s take a look at Mario Draghi, the head of the Financial Stability Forum which is the organization which will be the regulatory body, from Wikipedia:

    “He advocated privatisation as a permanent solution, one that his academic advisers favored for efficiency reasons as well. Draghi was appointed chairman of the Italian Committee for Privatisations in 1993, and carried out extensive privatisation (totaling 108 billion dollars in market value) up to about 1999. Proceeds from privatisation helped to reduce government debt, and thus meet the Maastricht treaty’s criteria for admission to the Euro. In 1998 Draghi was the major author of a law regulating corporate governance (including takeovers) in Italy, which became known as the “Draghi Law”. Draghi joined Goldman Sachs as a partner in January 2002, and resigned in January 2006.”

    For all the talks of “socialism” being lobbed by the right, I don’t this FSB has to do with any kind of substantial change to the way that business is done. It seems more likely that it is a step taken by capital to ensure its continuing reign over the globe.

  2. Guy’s points regarding Rick’s statements are seconded here. Christ did have squat to say about white preservation, but the Klan sure does. Rick is correct to identify that the current unfoldings in the global economy have a spiritual component; it always has. Catherine’s work has demonstrated that those who have suffered disproportionately from government corruption have to day predominantly been non-whites living in cities. Laying claim to being victimized by Jews and darkie collaborators needs to be balanced by a sense of accountability for reaping what you’ve sown. Do you really believe in your heart that more self-serving distortions of Christ’s message is going to bring sweet fruit? Do you believe the Bible when it says the sins of the father will be visited upon the son? Do you have the courage to believe in Christ’s message of redemption?

  3. there are 5 major “insider” factions at play ON THIS PLANET AT PRESENT ………..some are good…….others are not. The good news is that the “baddies” are at present taking a mortal hit and we are seeing their final desperate attempt for survival. All is not as it seems on the surface…anyone interested in learning more……just Google “5 major insider factions”……….the inside info is there…..AND KEEP THE FAITH

  4. The IMF is giving 750 billion to “developing” countries with a “good guy” facade – but in reality it is only piling more debt on countries that have been in debt to it already. This goes right back to Wall Street in the form of more fictitious paper entries which it can then capitalize on and create more bullshit wealth.

    New boss, the same as the old boss.

  5. Guy:

    The way I would say it is…we can choose to be on the pro-centralization team or on the pro-decentralization team. What is no longer available is being in the middle of the road. That position is reserved for road kill,

    Catherine

  6. The white middle class is starting to feel the pinch of an economic system that has committed genocide against miliions of “useless eaters” for decades. Yet the white middle class is silent when it comes to the violence and extortion that has been visited on others. If the “white middle class” wants to be taken seriously – it needs to break past its little niche that has been carved out for it by empire and see the systematic exploitation that is now starting to visit it and stand in solidarity with others who have been victims of this empire for so much longer.

  7. to Rick:you raise 2 issues I have not been able to resolve(1)has the Christian ethic adaquate defense mechanisms against those who would destroy it? at the moment, I think not. Christians quibble the bible,while ‘others’ strategize 24/7 (wall st. & friends)to rob wealth of honest working folk.and clearly, they are winning. (2)how do we defend against the inappropriately disproportionate influence of “Jewish ethic” in politics, culture,finance,education,media,etc.?first is to understand Judaism is not a religion,it is a political philosophy-“we rule,you serve.”It is secretive,secular and genetically based.(anyone can be a Christian,you must be born a Jew.)”white Christian” males rush to Afghanistan to kill and die to defend international bankers interest in opium,but would not think to research and defend against those destroying America.indeed,they will lift arms against fellow citizens on command.what to do,Rick?

  9. ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS, OF COURSE!

    During 2007, the major political event was the populous uprising against, and subsequent defeat of the “amnesty” legislation in the U.S. Congress. So how did it come about that the two major political parties ended up nominating McCain and Obama for President in 2008, both high-visibility supporters of the “comprehensive immigration reform” bill? To many it was a mystery. McCain actually was slightly in the lead before the financial panic set in. After that, Obama was a shoo-in.

    The financial panic created by and for financialists created another contrived panic, that of the politicians, and they acquiesce in the greatest crime in American history: the simultaneous thefts of our Constitution, our liberties, and our wealth. Of course it was all marketed to the public as necessary because of extraordinary circumstances.

    Cui bono? The first bail-out program, TARP benefitted the bankers, i.e., the international financiers, to the tune of hundreds of billions, if not trillions. Without intending to seem anti-Semitic, I would simply attest that the international financier class are predominantly Jewish. The second and follow-on programs will benefit the financiers again, and also recipients of federal contracts for massive infrastructure rebuilding and “green” industries. Market signals will be ignored in the interests of the recipients of this stupefyingly largess. Many of the political class have remarked that “it is important that the federal contracts do not go to ‘white men.’” The contracts are to be steered to minorities and women.

    Cui malo? So who is going to be the hurt the most? Why of course, white, Christian, middle-class males. They are the only group that will not be a recipient of the federal funds, and hence, since they are the major taxpayer group, will also bear the greatest burden. In fact, that was the whole reason for the exercise. The super wealthy secular whites and Jews at the top of the financial world have been bailed out and replenished in the greatest wealth redistribution in history. The minorities at the bottom will be rewarded with federal contracts and employment. These will be funded by taxes on the middle-class and ultimately inflationary policies which will wipe out any of their remaining savings.

    The white, Christian middle-class male will be squeezed between the power grasping elite, and the minority under-classes. That is why Obama was imposed on us. As the British Colonial Office learned in the 19th Century, to efficiently control a territory, choose a minority to train as administrators to run it for you, as that will direct the majority’s resentments against them, not against you. Today, minorities and women are being positioned to “control” the country, and the rest of Western Civilization in the interests of the elite. It is a good bargain for both in their desire to suppress and destroy their mutual enemy, the white, Christian, middle-class male and his culture.

    The ultimate goal is to reimpose a neo-feudalism with a tiny minority at the top, a small “priestly” and warrior class as their controlling mechanism, and the vast majority of the world’s population as peasants, to be treated not much better than domestic cattle.

  10. The difference is a bit like being the CEO as Europe with your largest shareholders vs being a member of a committee with Europe money having the controlling votes.

  11. “FED and SEC under the control of the IMF.”

    * Well the player in the IMF with the most veto power is far and away the United States. The IMF has been enforcing American empire since its creation – what’s the big f’ing deal – how is this substantively different than what has been going on? And if we follow the “conspiracy theorists” logic, the FED was set up by private bankers to begin with. So how is the FED under the auspices of the IMF different? Umm – this is a null argument when you break it down. The UN has been a tool of Empire as well – it’s located in the EMPIRE state for chirssakes. LOL. See – these johnny come lately corporately controlled “patriots” on Fox news are just using different buzz words to scare you about one side of the coin while they shuffle around trying to get you to believe in their side of the coin. Same friggin’ coin!

    “Putting the American economy under international regulation”

    * What does that mean – this is just scare tactics. Empire is the same as world government – one and the same. Fox news wants empire and not world government? Please tell me how they are different? These political discussions are devoid of any kind of real weight – just shuffling around two sides of the same coin.

Comments are closed.