The Cosmic Implications of Mind Control with Dr. Joseph Farrell

21 Comments

1. Elites use humans as paint brushes to design their world.

   In defense of Jackson Pollock some of his works using the paint drip technique creating an undisciplined quality is IMO like looking at nature. Look at a tree, the branches and leaves are unpredictable where they grow on a tree trunk and yet there is order. Or they are like looking at the stars in the heavens, it looks random, but there is order.
   Would of Jackson Pollock be famous even in his lifetime with the many types of support from Peggy Guggenheim? That is a good question.

2. This was another fascinating, thought-provoking chat with Dr. Farrell. Am anxiously waiting for the book to arrive. My late mom, a classical pianist trained in Juilliard in the early ’50s, was exposed to the modernist composers Alban Berg and Arnold Schoenberg in her classes for her Masters in Music. She bought the LPs for class, but she found the music truly unlistenable, and we never actually played them on our phonograph when we were kids. I have tried “appreciating” them on my own in recent years, watched an opera or two and lending an ear to their music- but for the life of me, I shall remain a “Philistine” as far as these modernists are concerned. The twelve-tone system is based on nothing natural- all just totally made up by its proponents. Hence the disorienting effect on listeners. What’s interesting is that early Schoenberg is also wholly palatable stuff, just like early Picasso. Then there’s the ultimate mockery (to me) that is John Cage, and his post-modernist “composition” called “4′ 33”- just 4-1/2 minutes of complete silence. You also have news stories of people in modern art museums mistaking an “installation” for trash, and some dupes photographing a pair of eyeglasses on the floor.

   Thank you so much for all these wonderful discussions! So glad to “meet” some people who are grounded in reality and unafraid to tell the whole truth about this unhealthful silliness.

   1. Correction- not the 12-tone, meant the ATONAL system of the modernists is completely made-up and not based on any natural harmonies or frequencies.

      Good reading: https://ask.audio/articles/music-theory-exploring-the-432hz-tuning-debate

      1. Thanks. Still trying to understand…more reading to do, so I appreciate these links.

3. About Picasso’s abilities:

   If you do a search on “early Picasso,” you may find examples of his talents. He had an academic training in art from an early age. Many abstract artists began with thorough training in academic drawing and painting. (Pollack was not one of them, according to his bio.)

   10 Early Picasso Works You Should Know – DailyArtMagazine.com
   http://www.dailyartmagazine.com/10-early-picasso-works-know/

   The college I went to in the late ‘50s prepared us with quite academic training, while exposing us to art history, prehistoric art and a history class in modern art which included learning about Monet, van Gogh, Picasso, Dali, Braque, and the latest at that time – the abstract expressionists and Pollack. We were free to experiment.

   Addi J.

   1. To me it is essential to have complete freedom to experiment. Problem is when some people are free to print money and massively promote and fund a particular genre for a particular reason. I love early Picasso.

4. I don’t see the music credits. The music makes such a nice frame to the audio interview.

5. If you and Joseph think the mind control is bad, I say its worse than you think. This is a fashion show from not so big designers in NYC. One of the designers is a drag queen so it’s not the norm but celebrated.

   This is a collaboration they did with Disney. Yes, Disney and I’m sure you’re not shocked by that. I dare you to tell the difference between the boys and the girls. It gets worse, there’s even a drag child dressed as a black angel.

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de4kyuwWHr0

   I don’t think of myself as a prude but this kind of debauchery is not why I joined the arts.

   1. Wow. How ugly. Is that the same Disney that made Mary Poppins and Winnie the Pooh?

6. Great, great concept and interview. Joseph is a terrific assembler of information and whether or not his predictions are borne out, his ability to create coherent narratives makes the information itself more useful. This is part of what I was delighted with when Katherine Horton interviewed him recently. He was able to basically compose and render an overture of the historical facts that led from the original employment of religion as an institutional buttress to a self-sustaining society and through its eventual misuse for private, hidden purposes to our present reality where manipulation is the norm and freedom of anything is pretty well dissipated. It’s the very ordering of facts that makes one resistant to manipulative interests and such should be at the masthead of Solari. To live a free and inspired life, one needs to shed the pervasive, energy-depleting cognitive dissonances that are, quite candidly, the premise of a random, unintelligent universe where there is no sense in the first place or the last. I look forward to reading the book.

   In the matter of publishing, I have bought some of Walter Bosley’s books from Lulu and though I found them worthwhile, I am not sure that this publication method is the best choice. And I do not mean from the standpoint of commerce, rather from the standpoint of beneficial editorial input. Joseph himself, in the latest Nefarium, lamented the complaints he apparently has received. Those of us who are experienced readers of the alternative studies genre know to filter out the kinds of editorial peccadilloes of formatting, punctuation and syntax in favor of the author’s intent. The wider market, which desperately needs to hear a lot of the information, will have a tendency to stumble over such things, missing the point as it quibbles about the form. Thus, I want to propose that Richard Dolan (and Richard Dolan Press), who seems a very scrupulous editor, try publishing some of the future output of Dr. Farrell, ahead of a decision to go the Lulu route exclusively. Not incidentally, there is probably a worthwhile authorial project for someone to put together a Joseph P. Farrell Primer, if a volunteer arises. There are now so many Farrell books that have to be digested that it would be too daunting for most potential converts to undertake, but a single overviewing volume might work wonders for spreading the very valuable words.

   1. Actually, it is much simpler. There are a number of great editors. They cost money. If someone was willing to offer Joseph funds to pay for a really good editor to give hs next book a thorough going over, that would do it. A good editing job is expensive. We are just posting the Rise of the Asian Consumer tomorrow. I had it edited three times by three different editors. Expensive and time consuming.

7. The book brings together aspects not previously associated, such as the deeper aspects of music, social engineering and political events. And has definitively freed the topic of mind control – individual or collective – from the “Cold War” cocoon with which it is often associated, broadening the temporal scope from the remote past to today’s world.

   1. Having a debate with one subscriber who loves Stravinsky and Picasso. He thinks Farrell drew the noose too tight and makes some good arguments. I don’t believe it negates Farrell’s fundamental point.

      I just visited the Salvador Dali museum in Figures Spain. Just amazing. Question in my mind is whether Dali painted the fracturing of the human mind in the 20th century or someone made sure his mind was fractured as well.

      1. I’m not sure if his mind was fractured or not but he seems to see from whence the fracturing is coming. See his painting at the Dali Museum in St. Petersburg, Fla. Observe: Europe is crushed and partially covered by water as the “New Man” is being born in the US.
         “Geopoliticus” child watching the birth of the new man

         1943
         https://www.salvador-dali.org/en/artwork/catalogue-raisonne/1940-1951/578/geopoliticus-child-watching-the-birth-of-the-new-man

         1. Yes..When you consider what is happening with transhumanism the painting is even more frightening.

      2. Looking at some of Picasso’s sketches, especially ‘Study for Weeping Head. Sketch for Guernica’ (1937) he certainly displays very little talent for sketching and drawing. In fact, this sketch is really disconcerting to look at because it feels like an attack on paper with a pencil by a disturbed child. Contrast this with the truly gruesome ‘David with the Head of Goliath’ by Caravaggio and the latter is still infinitely more palatable due to the inherent beauty in his skill as an artist.

      3. What do you think of Dali’s “Corpus Christi”?

         1. Do you mean Crucifixion? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_(Corpus_Hypercubus)

            1. Yes

8. Read the book. Cannot improve on what Catherine Austin Fitts already stated in the interview and intro.
   Was sick for a few days whilst and after reading the book. Reality can strike hard but I rather do it with my eyes wide open and work towards and or pray for change conscious and awake then living in a dreamscape viewing but not really participating but still undergoing all shenanigans thrown at you.

   1. Only one way to avoid being a patsy and to make real breakthroughs and that is looking at things as they are.

Comments are closed.