"It [the experimental injection] is a bioweapon. If people don’t understand, we cannot help them."
~ Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

By Catherine Austin Fitts

I’m delighted to have Dr. Sherri Tenpenny back on the Solari Report for the latest update on the experimental injections. Since January 2020, Dr. Tenpenny has been on a mission to educate as many people as possible about Covid-19 and the risks of a “vaccine” that is being presented as the solution to the “crisis.” Dr Tenpenny’s new book covers 20 mechanisms through which these injections may injure people. Months after the first injections have been administered, we still don’t know exactly what’s in them—and it appears that the recipe may be changing!

While this is happening, bank stocks are flying. There is growing concern about the implementation in the next few months of a total control system (“passports”) targeting work, spatial movement, and finance. It is imperative to understand the physical dangers of these experimental injections and how they may relate to the central bankers’ push for total control.

In this interview, Dr. Tenpenny and I discuss a possible third wave that could be worse due to antibody-dependent enhancement, concerns about the stability of the messenger RNA (mRNA) during transport, the latest OSHA ruling, issues around liability and informed consent, as well as what we can do to slow down the use of Covid-19 to justify rising tyranny and inequality.

Join me for another not-to-be-missed interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny.

Related Links:

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s website where you can find her latest creations:

  • New podcast: The Tenpenny Files
  • Bootcamp: A 6-week online intensive training on vaccines and how to communicate on those difficult topics in a way that is effective but not offensive
  • E-book: The 20 Mechanisms of Injury

Special podcast with Dr. Lee Merritt on the history of infertility shots and the difference between shedding and transmitting something

Summary of Further Modelling of Easing Restrictions – Roadmap Step 2

New York Times Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker

VAERS Adverse Events (when a patient dies after COVID-19 vaccine)

VAERS Adverse Events (any adverse event after receiving COVID-19 vaccine)

Third COVID Wave Will Kill Or Hospitalize 60 To 70% People Who Took Both The Vaccine Doses Says Official UK Govt Model

Similar Posts

74 Comments

  2. Wonderful interview, thank you both.

    I am following the story about the public & televised collapse of Denmark’s Christian Eriksen on the field during a Euro 2021 football match on June 12th. He made a pass and collapsed, was resuscitated on the field while teammates were obviously very emotional. Official cause is cardiac arrest – he is 29.

    https://www.soccerladuma.co.za/news/articles/international/categories/euro-2016/christian-eriksen-was-gone/700731?gallery=700692&gallery-page=2#ig-700692

    Fans were quick to say on social media that his team doctor (Inter Milan) had stated that the player got va xx end of May, but now team CEO denies this and MS press has come out very strongly denying rumours calling them the stuff of anti-V conspiracy stuff.

    Just wanted to put out there that some high level athletes have got their injections (and are expected to get them too) but If they start collapsing on TV after their shots, this will be a problem won’t it?

    Something to look out for.

    Monique (wife of Robert)

    1. Hard to prove it was the injection. I am reminded by a great cardiologist that this does happen in sports without injections. I assume it was the injection.

      1. Yes, it is hard to prove indeed. But still, I continue to look into it.

        Seems Christian Eriksen will be fitted with a heart-starting device and may even continue playing. Another football player, Daley Blind, collapsed in August 2020 and was fitted with a heart device after being diagnosed with heart inflammation.

        https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/12500542/daley-blind-collapses-ajax-heart-problems/

        Both players played with Ajax Amsterdam and were close friends. It seems very strange that this should happen to two young players who were both on same team, no? But I don’t suppose doctors will look into it, so will we ever know?

        https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-9682847/Daley-Blind-reveals-considered-not-playing-Holland-Christian-Eriksen-collapsed.html

  3. Hi Catherine, I want to complete the nanoparticle protocol. What exactly do I do for the baptism after saying ‘all nanoparticles that remain must serve the Christ’?
    Thanks

  4. I’d love to hear Dr. Tenpenny’s opinion on NAC as r/t someone who’s already had a shot?
    Fantastic interview, thank you ladies.

    https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
    ” In the current study, we show that S protein alone can damage vascular endothelial cells (ECs) .. ”
    “These changes of pACE2, ACE2, MDM2 expression, and AMPK activity in endothelium were recapitulated by in vitro experiments using pulmonary arterial ECs (endothelial cells ) infected with Pseu-Spike which was rescued by treatment with N-acetyl-L-cysteine, a reactive oxygen species inhibitor (Figure [B], ii).”

    1. I also wonder the history of those FDA approved drugs pulled from the market for re-evaluation and application of “black box warnings”, and how does that compare with this treatment that’s approved only through EUA?
      What’s the criteria and how are we measuring up with the vax?
      I haven’t looked it up but I’m gonna guess that drugs have been pulled for far less than what we’ve seen so far from this mess.

  6. While I greatly admire Dr. Tenpenny and her unparalleled work on informing us about the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines, I was very disappointed in her homophobic comments at the end of the interview. Homosexuality is a state of being, not an act. We are all made by the same Creator. There are many statements n the Bible that are not relevant to today’s societal standards of morality. Those of us who are gay and also sincerely striving to help humanity wake up to the globalists’ threats should not be shunned by this community.

    1. I totally agree – very small minded, blinded comment. I had to take a deep breath and reflect whether or not I was going to come back to this site – I have not heard anything that appalling in a VERY LONG time –

      1. I am enjoying it while my subscription lasts; not sure if I’ll renew. Mostly because all I got from Catherine was a confusing “LOL!” to my comment about this. I absolutely LOVE hearing from my elders and appreciate their wealth of knowledge and what they’ve seen during their lifetime, but to hear that I’m not gonna be welcome, whether explictly as Tenpenny expresses, or implicitly by Catherine’s silence on the divisive comment, well.. she’s right to say its further division. Things like this can be confronted while preserving the dignity of Tenpenny and her research. Its not that hard, just say something like, ‘this isn’t the place to discuss such things’ …
        Tenpennys comment makes this video un-shareable as now allllll the information is clouded by her comment near the end. Look how many people here have said how bothered they are by it. We are trying to find sanity in crazy times and we still get hit in the face with this kinda stuff. Why??
        I’m actually more upset that she voiced her comment in the interview; I respect her right to have her own opinion on the matter, but a professional will not let their opinions come before the research and the work to awaken humanity to Mr. Global’s plans. How can we mobilize against it if we still get stuck on things like this?

        I want to move past it. I want to ignore it and just focus on what’s good here.

        1. Actually, the LOL was meant for a different thread. Went back and realized it looked like it was to yours. Not quite sure how that happened. Will check back after todays recording and see if I can find my response or rewrite it.

          1. My approach is defined by my early access to a rich flow of intelligence about how the people at the top manage things. As a result, I focus on what has the biggest Delta – what gets the most result for the least effort.

            The people who are centralizing control are hurting everyone – I describe the issue here in the story of my mothers assassination:

            https://home.solari.com/meditations-at-the-crossroads/

            I focus on the violations of the Constitution, the law and regulations by the US government and the financial institutions that harms everyone and what we can do about it – both individually, in families, in communities. If we allow a small group of people freedom to operate above the law, we are toast.

            I generally avoid the issues that galvanize strong emotional reactions. I have found that an institution can steal $100,000 per taxpayer but win the taxpayer as a customer if they give them a tiny kickback to open an account
            and make ads catering to their sexual preferences.

            I have spent too much time listening to people at the top realize they are free to steal all the money and poison and kill with impunity so long as they embroil the taxpayers with endless series of cultural issues.

            Are these issues important? Yes. But most of the public debates and generation of offense are engineered furballs.

            For the most part I avoid them all- not because they are not important but because I do not have the bandwidth.

            I don’t speculate because I don’t have all the time I want for investment. I tend not to read or listen to disinformation or sources of questionable integrity, not because it might not be useful, but because I do not have enough time to watch and read everything of high integrity that I think is important to read or watch.

            It is a bandwidth issue. My enemies have trillions. I operate on a small trickle – which I am most grateful for as it gives me the basis to lead from a place of independence.

            What I know about the issues I do focus on is that if we solved the governance issues, including the related management of currency, equity and government credit, all the other issues would sort out. Consequently, I focus on what will get the job done as opposed to the things that get people all riled up – in many cases because we have been programmed to get all riled up.

            The reason i did not engage with Tenpenny related to her comment on homosexuality was that it was not the topic of the interview and the interview was ending. The last thing i wanted to do was start on a new topic that can not be short and I did not want to start on a topic that was not germane to the immediate conversation.

            Tenpenny has repeatedly risked her life, her financial security and worked
            very hard to protect everyone – all ages, all background, all sexual indentities. If everyone had done what Tenpenny has done, we would not be in this pickle.

            In my book she has every right to express her opinion on any of the sex and culture war issues she cares about. But I am not interested in discussing or following up.

            I know my enemies. There is nothing they would love more than to herd me into that trap. It would make their day. They tried for many years to frame me and snare me on homosexuality issues. It never worked – other than to provide me with massive intelligence on their many uses of both hetrosexual and homosexual politics. The Shriek-O-Meter is endlessly creative when it comes to human sexuality.

            If I could make any recommendation, it would be to study mind control and how these fur balls get created and managed.

            And then there is this:

            https://library.solari.com/commentary-collection-promoting-women/

  7. I am slightly confused about something Dr. Tenpenny said. I am writing with the hope that she and/or the Solari community will provide some clarity to me. Dr. Tenpenny referred to the white paper SPI-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2. The specific paragraphs on which she focused were paragraph 32 and paragraph 56. In the interview Dr. Tenpenny said, “That the third wave that, when it comes this fall, that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die.” After this Catherine displayed a bit of shock, as did I when I heard Dr. Tenpenny make this statement. Catherine placed the link to the article in the Related Links section above. I followed the link and read the two paragraphs from which Dr. Tenpenny pulled this information. I read them along with her as she read in the video and several times afterward as well as the rest of the report. Dr. Tenpenny later remarked in the interview, “what they’re saying though is,…, what they’re admitting to in that paper, is antibody dependent enhancement is real.” I did not come to the same conclusion as her from this particular document.

    While I am not a doctor, I am an officer in the Army, and I read many white papers each month as well as articles, books, and other technical writings spanning a plethora of subject matter. Let me tell you what I extrapolated from those paragraphs. Paragraph 32 states,

    “The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have
    received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave
    respectively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals. This is discussed further in paragraphs 55 and 56.”

    From this, I draw the conclusion that of those who become hospitalized or die, 60% to 70% will have received the first and second doses of the shot. This differs from Dr. Tenpenny’s statement, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die.” As paragraph 32 states, “This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals.” Since, in other areas of the white paper, the uptake of the shot in the at-risk age group is projected to be 95%, this statement draws the conclusion that these older individuals would have passed due to greater complicating issues regardless of whether they received one dose, two doses, or no dose. Again, this is my understanding of what the white paper is saying versus Dr. Tenpenny’s statement, and I am more than open to being enlightened on what I may have misunderstood.

    Paragraph 32 states, “This is discussed further in paragraphs 55 and 56.” My final query in this matter comes from my understanding of paragraph 56, which states,

    “This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines. This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds). There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.”

    Dr. Tenpenny read from sentence one and sentence four in the interview with Catherine, but she skipped over sentences two and three. I assume she skipped over these because they get a bit statistical and mathematical, which doesn’t usually go over well in a verbal interview. I would probably do the same and expect enthusiasts to go through the entire white paper, reading each paragraph for personal comprehension and analysis, which I did. In skipping these two sentences, the audience who only heard Dr. Tenpenny’s words and didn’t read the paragraph for themselves, who also heard her statement, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die,” may reach this same conclusion. There is the phrase, “in a post-Roadmap resurgence”, alluding to the several phases outlined in the rest of the report and other results, that may inspire someone to go back and reread the two paragraphs or more of the document. Sentences two and three, in my opinion, circle back to a point made in paragraph 32, “This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups.” Paragraph 56 also makes the statement, “There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death,” leading me to believe that this 9.5% outlying group is the majority of the 60% to 70% of those who received the two doses that will be hospitalized or die.

    Throughout the document there are several references to a resurgence, but it will be far less than anything we have seen in the past. This deduces, again, the 9.5% of at-risk recipients discussed could plausibly engross most of the 60% – 70% that will be hospitalized or die having previously received both doses of the COVID shot. I do not believe this is solely due to the shot or differing behavior. Personally, I don’t buy anything about hospitalization rates or death rates from 2019, 2020, or 2021. I also don’t buy the efficacy statistics reported by news organizations, governments, or pharmaceutical companies regarding the shot. I do think there are more sinister forces at work in this, but I also cannot bring myself to see how Dr. Tenpenny discerned, “…that 60 to 70 percent of people who have had two shots will be hospitalized or die,” from the same document to which she continually referred, which is SPI-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2.

    1. I have stumbled over the same sentence in her earlier interviews, also during the Yuba City event just recently. When I finally got hold of the SAGE report she mentions, I read the aforementioned paragraphs and I agree with your assessment. The sentence in paragraph 32 particularly does not seem to translate to Dr Tenpenny’s interpretation. I concluded with your interpretation first (that 60-70% of those in the 3rd wave could get hospitalized or die – and not 60-70% of those who hot the shots) – but in addition, paragraph 32 “The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave
      respectively.” does not make a lot of sense either: are they trying to say that of the portion of people in the 3rd wave that will be hospitalized, 60% will have had shot(s) and that of the portion of people in the 3rd wave that will die, 70% will have had shot(s)?? This to me seems to align with your 7th and 8th paragraph?

    3. Thank you, Eddie. Excellent analysis and research. It is a good reminder never to forget to question everything.

    4. This means a subset of injected people may have a false illusion of safety, when they would benefit from the same treatments that have worked for many non-injected people:

      – early symptom detection (now delayed by vaccine suppression of symtoms)
      – early & prophylactic treatment with Vit D, Vit C, zinc, quercetin / HCQ / Ivermectin

      i.e. the crime of treatment suppression also applies to the injected.

  8. I have listened to the links here and slept on this issue and have decided to throw caution to the wind. I refuse to live my life in fear of this so will just ignore it, never take a jab but hug everyone.
    I wonder if we have even considered the possibility that the ultimate goal is to vaccinate and protect all the compliant and then release the real killer of the independent and religious who will fight any such future elite/banking/fed control policies. Such a crazy world we live in…

    1. I continue to associate with several people who have been vaccinated. I do know of people who have changed personality since being vaccinated. It is very disturbing.

      1. It is very difficult to associate with only those who are unvaccinated as, where I live, there are very few who are unvaccinated. I notice attitude/behavior differences with those who are vaccinated…some quickly back away when they learn I am unvaccinated, some seem angry (one of my best friends got in my face and said ‘get it done!’), some just totally ignore me and some, saying they feel bullet-proof, simply act as if nothing is a problem.
        From an anthropological/sociological perspective, I am kind of enjoying perceiving/watching how this all plays out, but I also feel my grief when I future-focus with all the possible death. When I am not grounded in the present, I feel as if I am living in a simulation. I do SO appreciate this forum!!

  9. Dear Catherine,
    I appreciate you so much for all you bring to us. I have looked to you for guidance for many years and especially now in these turbulent, scary times. You are my go to person!! I also looked up to Dr Tenpenny for all of her time and deep diving into vaccines, that is, untill today… I haven’t been refered to as an “abomination” for many, many years. Wow, that was a punch in the gut! I really felt the world had progressed from that mind set. Apparently I was wrong. I had no idea she felt this way. I was going to do her boot camp but now I know “my kind” wouldn’t be welcome. With her comments she has chosen to alient a whole group of human beings. I thought we were all working collectively….. gay, straight, conservative, liberal, black, white, asian, poor, rich etc. to fight Mr Global. How do I support someone when they feel I am an “abomination”? I know there are much bigger issues going on right now than me being hurt by her comments, but I just had to say how disappointed I am that Dr Tenpenny feels this way. Thanks to Josephine and Barbara for their comments. Well said!

    1. Dr. Tenpenny is not the only one I have encountered in the fight against Mr. Global with reactionary “Burn the witches!”-type thoughts that express an underlying sentiment of building back an Old Testamentic world of guilt and penalty.

      We shall definitely overcome Mr. Global together, but what kind of new culture will we then constitute? My hope is a real brotherhood of man!

    2. You are not alone; there are many of us in this Solari comment stream who have commented similarly. It seems we are also confused at the neutral reaction from Catherine on blind hatred of this kind. I suppose we shall see. There has to be a way to kindly address this issue while moving forward in the agenda for Freedom (for everyone!)

  10. Today in the Gannett paper here, The Ithaca Journal, we see that Gov. Cuomo has promised paid sick leave for anyone who needs time to recover from the injections. Will doctors be trained to treat? Earlier NY learned of a college-scholarship lottery, and we have been offered free state park passes. My YMCA has announced one lane in the pool for the un-injected. Looks like I will have to declare my status or quit swimming, my best lifetime exercise. I think the reduction goals are not higher that 10% on this round, so probably the ingredients in my area are not lethal. Still, I resent the coercion from the dearest ones. Thanks for listening, many thanks fr your speaking. Lisa Turner

  11. Thank you Catherine and Dr. Tenpenny for an incredibly informative interview. Two amazing and ultra-smart women in their fields collaborating to get the information to us and help connect the dots…Namaste!
    I have tried for many months now to protect my friends and primarily my ‘pod’ of 10 family members. My two sisters and all my close friends have taken the jabs much to my heart-felt sadness. I have stopped giving them educational information and don’t talk Covid with them anymore; and simply accept their choices.
    However, I just learned that my only son-in-law just took the J&J shot a few weeks ago. My daughter has not and probably won’t as she has auto-immune issues and has had a bad reaction to a DPT vaccine in the past. My two grandchildren, aged 7 and 4 are the youngest in the family and I pray they are not harmed, but could they be?
    They are due to visit with my husband and me (neither of us has taken any shots) for several weekends this summer. Can I hug my grandchildren and daughter? Will they be carrying the transmitted spike protein from their Dad? Will he spread this spike protein in my home? Do I put any restrictions of masks and/or testing before they come until more is known? Should they wait for longer before they visit? I am on prophylactic HCQ, Vit D3, quercetin, Mag, Vit C and some more. My husband is on Vit D3, Mag and has both ‘electrical and plumbing’ issues with his heart with an LAD stent and is on some heart meds. I am confident I am protected, but concerned about him. I would SO appreciate any feedback, resources; the interview as well as all the comments always ultra-inform! I do see a few links already in the comment section so will check those out and I did take Dr. Tenpenny’s 20 MOI ‘course’ and learned a lot and will purchase her ebook; I so appreciate all the deep-dives she has and is doing….an angel for sure! THANKS TO ALL FOR ALL YOUR INPUTS!!

  13. I agree with Paul and Yoko regarding Dr. Tenpenny and her summary of the two SAGE document paragraphs. It therefore places doubt on other points she makes.

    On a positive note there is an edifying interview by Bret Weinstein with Geert Vanden Bossche. Kind of lengthy but a very stimulating conversation as Geert has ‘specialist expertise in virology and vaccinology’. Spike protein s and other nuances of the so-called vaccine are addressed thoroughly. Bret has done his homework.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNyAovuUxro

  14. Dear Catherine

    You asked Dr Tenpenny about the magnet challenge. Here’s a link to a recent interview in which Dr Dolores Cahill discusses this point.

    Part 1:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/XahoaHIrCu0l/

    Part 2:
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/mV8geNokcPEx/

    The slideshow about the history of biological warfare has left me shaken, especially about Macfarlane Burnet’s plans for reducing the population of Southeast Asia. I am beginning to think that having a Nobel prize is a badge of shame.

    In terms of the stories of people bleeding who have been in contact with an injected person, have there been any reports of pets exhibiting unusual bleeding as well?

  15. @48.12 There are pastors out there who will not conform… My husband and I — Presbyterian co-pastors — standing our ground and will not get injected… And will not have a clinic… Sadly though, our parish is all injected… We have seen side-effects… At least we have honored and continue to honor the freedom of choice and this from our Book of Order… “That “God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men which are in anything contrary to his Word, or beside it, in matters of faith or worship.”
    b. Therefore we consider the rights of private judgment, in all matters that respect religion, as universal and unalienable: We do not even wish to see any religious constitution aided by the civil power, further than may be necessary for protection and security, and at the same time, be equal and common to all others.”

  16. Is it possible to get a copy of the SAGE report? If so, what is the link?

    Thank you. I am working on a Notice of Liability for the injection and would like to reference this.

  17. Wow, what an incredible researcher and we are lucky to have people like Tenpenny working for freedom and justice. I only wish she’d kept her anti-homosexuality opinion to herself.

    Jesus freed us from strict observance from Old Testament rules, which were specific to ancient Israeli society. “And the whole of the law is to love thy neighbor as thyself,” seems pretty clear. The ten commandments are clear on morality (Natural Law) and do not cover homosexuality either. If we must adhere strictly to these Old Testament rules, we are ignoring the gift of Christ’s sacrifice as well as ignoring his greatest commandment (love each other as thyself.) It is more a choice of bigotry and I’m going to guess it comes from the culture and generation Tenpenny has occupied on this planet.

    I respect Tenpenny and greatly appreciate what she is doing.

    For more information, as well as specific verses about this, I found this resource: https://www.christianbiblereference.org/faq_OldTestamentLaw.htm

    Love,

    Your local Christian, freedom-fighting, neighbor-loving homosexual and Solari Report subscriber <3

  18. Great interview felt thankful for the work both people put in to help us understand the diabolical agenda. But then I was brought low and doubly shocked by Dr. Sherri’s hatred of a group of us labeled as homosexuals. I could feel the pink star of the Nazi’s on my chest. Don’t remember our slaughter?
    I’ve lost my respect for her.
    Barbara

    1. Agreed. Though I believe we should forgive her and give her space to re-inform her opinion, as she is doing much good for the overall cause of Freedom for humanity. I too found that portion of the interview to be a bit like someone dumping a bucket of cold water over my head; disorienting to say the least.

    3. Here is the little secret. If everyone agreed to uphold the Constitution and run the government money and operations within the laws, all the divide and conquer issues would do little to no harm. I am not prepared to allow tyranny to win by focusing on these differences. It has been a Mr. Global tactic and it is working. Since I don’t want to be a slave, I refuse to worry about issues that will not change our practical trajectory other than to serve Mr. Global.

    4. Dr Tenpenny’s talk about homosexuals being an abomination and the lack of pushback from any of the other participants left a sour taste in my mouth and it made me wonder if this group of supposed enlightened scientist is one with which I would want to be associated, let alone one from which I trust to learn the ‘truth’.

  19. As always, a thought-provoking discussion between Catherine and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny. Thank you!

    I noticed that during the interview, Dr. Tenpenny briefly mentioned that although anyone can browse VAERS data on the official HHS portal, it’s quite difficult to do so. The information on there is rather obfuscated.

    I usually use a great resource called OpenVAERS (https://www.openvaers.com). It’s a site exclusively dedicated to presenting all of the VAERS data but in a much more polished and simple interface. It’s run by a small team of individuals whose lives have been negatively impacted by vaccine injuries.

    I wanted to share this resource with my fellow Solari community subscribers and with Catherine.

  20. I enjoyed the interview – always insightful. However, I echo Paul that Dr. Tenpenny’s initial statement does not seem to be accurate given what she read during your interview. Did she misunderstand the findings or am I missing critical pieces of info to get to the conclusion she did?

    Tore, the other super-woman I follow, has talked about how different demographics, even in the same geographical area, are given different batches of vaccines (not just covid). She has talked about there being multiple batches with different formulations at least a few times, but here are a couple of those times.
    https://tore-says-show.simplecast.com/episodes/tue-30-mar-gene-scene-med-tyranny-policy-fail-minus-dna-vax-laws-walled-out-7-nations-NBWP3ktZ?t=1h48m20s

    https://tore-says-show.simplecast.com/episodes/tue-31-mar-by-design-versions-aplenty-pharmas-a-player-flu-vac-ties-dims-flounder-nanotech-what-greed-vs-humanity-YTSuQ7_g?t=0h14m31s

    I forget who said this – maybe Dr. Madej – but the reason why magnets stick to some people and not others is also related to there being multiple formulations.

    With regards to practices around vaccines, Tore also mentioned a suspense “novel” titles “Malice” by Jennifer Jaynes. According to Tore, the author exposed the corruption within the vaccine industry in the novel. Presenting it as a novel did not save her life as she died with two gun shots to her head some months after the publication of the book (and the official story was suicide). It sounds like this was a best seller in the U.S. – I don’t know if you ever read it. I am curious now what is in the book.
    https://tore-says-show.simplecast.com/episodes/post-thanksgiving-day-29-nov-19-the-hammer-yX06j01q?t=1h39m32s
    https://www.amazon.com/Malice-Jennifer-Jaynes/dp/1503903915

    1. Thank you for sharing this; I have purchased the book. (For some reason its half price right now as well!)
      The fact that she was killed after writing it has me very interested to read it, as well as sad for the loss of her in this world.

  21. Catherine,
    Myself and many others are confused about Ten penny’s statement concerning the sage article. Her statement does not line up with the paragraphs she read and claimed it was in plain English. Please find the article for us to read ourselves. Many thanks for all that you do…
    ~Paul

    1. I also found her interpretation of paragraphs 55-56 confusing upon a closer read. The projection and explanation didn’t raise a red flag with me other than point out the injections appear to be largely ineffective to emergent variants. The model predicts a post road map resurgence (another wave) and that deaths and hospitalizations will occur. The report states, “This shows that most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines.This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds). There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but,nevertheless,not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.”

  22. I have hugged at least two friends that have taken the Covid shot. Does this mean that they have shed on me? This is truly terrifying. I believe that love is important and that is why I still am friends with them. I will pray and hope that I have done the right thing.

    1. As CAF says, everyone must defend against the broader “Great Poisoning”.

      Fear can be infectious with psy effect of amplifying threats and weakening defenses.

      I take prophylactic treatment, monitor early symptoms (of whatever) and live precious life.

  23. New England Journal of Medicine
    Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
    Excerpt:
    Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported.

  24. Thanks for this discussion with Dr. Tenpenny Catherine! You both present such a necessary high level of quality research which truly helps to calm nerves out here a bit. So great to hear about the different aspects to the injection issue both medical and financial, the twin pillars of existence which both need to be healthy to ensure human survival. I was surprised to hear the latest director, appointed as of June 18, 2020, for the Natural Museum of London was Dr. Douglas Gurr…former Head of Amazon UK from 2016 to 2020, former Pres. of Amazon China 2014 to 2016, and formerly with McKinsey & Co. What is significant is the connection of this museum to a large scientific community which we can only hope will not be “hijacked” and used to promote “certain” scientific thinking. So many figureheads today have ties to organizations which can, if influenced in the wrong way, foster manipulation over science. So many current studies are slowly being headed by those who may be rather used to, comfortable with or formally a part of Mr. Global’s agenda….all too often results can be skewed. When you spoke of the hardware in our skies…there are websites online that really galvanize the immensity of just what’s up there….it’s 3/4’s of the “trap”. Control of the space lanes as you say…..
    Best Always to you.

  26. The food is poisoned. The air is poisoned. The water is poisoned. All of “medicine” is a factory for biological enslavement and dependence. Vaccine schedules are already incredibly aggressive.

    They don’t “need” this jab to do anything they haven’t already accomplished.

    Every esoteric theory for why, be it nanotechnology or gene manipulation, have uptake methodologies that don’t require this jab.

    Is it all about manufacturing consent? The more I fail to square these circles, to borrow a Masonic phrase, the more this seems ENTIRELY spiritual.

    1. If you look at the preparation of contracts that can provide a monthly injection, I think it is likely there is a physical installation involved even if the goal is entirely spiritual.

      1. 100%, Catherine. And there seems to be advantages for them using injectables that cross the blood-brain barrier vs. GI tract.

        As a “slow drip” alternative, however, MMR shot compliance is much higher than this jab will ever be, and it’s administered by the same companies with the same extralegal arbitration system already in place to mitigate financial liability.

        Ignoring the multivariate “stacked functions” of this agenda, in terms of preferred installation of the “OS of Life,” the word IMPATIENCE comes to mind.

        > Agenda 21 (~108 years at launch)
        > Agenda 2050 (~42 years at launch)
        > Agenda 2030 (~15 years at launch)

        Why the rush? There is far less resistance among the youth, they’d have this game on-lock if they didn’t press so hard and fast. This question is (mostly) rhetorical as if you can’t figure out why Mr. Global is blitzing, I sure as heck can’t.

        P.S. In the software industry, we call these rolling updates “Merge Requests.” Disturbingly fitting terminology.

  27. OSHA reversed its statement that employers are liable for adverse reactions to mandated vaccinations. Said they didn’t want to be seen as discouraging vaccinations.

  28. I cannot find the SAGE article among the links that Dr. Tenpenny refers to in the video

    1. Sent a message to Dr. Tennpenny’s assistant to send me the link

  29. My thought on why bank stocks are going up: because the insiders know the banks will be taking possession of millions of homes soon. Like, in the next few months. Obviously the Going Direct reset / CBDC will greatly reduce our need for commercial banking. So the stock prices are rising in spite of that. (Who’s your landlord, Citibank, or JP Morgan?)

    Re: covid injections: in the past two weeks I’ve had the following discussion at least ten times:
    Me: “Do you trust the government, Fauci, MSM, with how they’re handling Covid?”
    Response: “Oh, God no! Corrupt and incompetent.”
    Me: “I agree. Have you gotten the ‘vaccine?'”
    Response: “Yes. My work me told I had to.” or “I want to travel.” or “My Dr. said I needed it.”
    The disconnect is stunning. I’m realizing it’s just not that hard to coerce people, if that’s what you set out to do. (Every day = Milgram’s experiment.)

    I’m starting to appreciate what a pivotal year 1995 was, from what Catherine said in this video: Windows 95, backdoors, blackmail, and the congressional budget deal impasse.

    I’m also wondering if 1970 was such a year. May 4, Kent State. Four high-profile assassinations in the ’60s didn’t silence the “unruly” masses, so they decided to try turning their guns on the people; show ’em who’s boss. (The ONG coulda used tear gas.) https://www.kent.edu/may-4-historical-accuracy.

    As you two discussed, our leaders aren’t just corrupt, but thieves, criminals, and evil (their ‘failure’ to stem the opioid epidemic proves this). I see the manufactured Covid crisis as their “get out of jail free card,” because of how they’re using it to make us dependent, demoralized, and depopulated. People who “own nothing” will not be able to hold those who “own everything” to account, for child trafficking, $100T, etc. I suspect they’re rushing the ‘The Great Fascist Coup,’ I mean ‘Reset’, because they are worried about being held to account, for their horrible crimes. Epstein’s arrest was a close call for TPTB. Now Ghislaine’s trial is making them panic. And the 9/11 lawsuit.

    Despite what they say, the problem is not Democracy, or The People, or Capitalism. The problem is that power corrupts. Most of us don’t want to admit that, because we’re happy being distracted, or we think we lack the power to fight it. The abusive nature of Machiavellian leaders is that they want us to think we wrecked ‘their’ system which was ‘perfect.’ The mob bosses are intimidating the future jury, with a full-on assault on our minds, bodies, and spirit.

    My suggestion/hope: if Catherine’s audience fuses with Dr. Tenpenny’s, and that of Dr. Madej, FLCCC, Whitney Webb, Ryan Cristian, RFK Jr, AFLDS, Dr. Yeadon, The Corbett Report, Richard Grove, Slow News Day, and many Christian groups, then we’ve got an Army! We don’t have to agree on everything. Just that we firmly oppose vax mandates/ passports/ chip implants / CBDC. If Thomas Massey will advocate for us, along with a handful of (R) Governors, we can win!

    Thank you Catherine and Dr. Tenpenny for a very thought-provoking discussion!

    2. RE: Mortgage servicing…

      Around here, the irony is that if you don’t want your local bank or financial institution to sell your note to a large bank, you need to take a 7-year balloon loan.

      It will guarantee that your note is too illiquid to sell on the aftermarket and will be held locally, but it’s also a risky financial product if you can’t pay it off in time.

      Of course, they’ll let you refinance to a “traditional” mortgage and sell it off to JPM, Citi, BofA, etc. but that seems even more risky in the current state of affairs.

      1. Also variable by time and evolving needs for manipulation.

        Counter-intelligence training needed.

  30. I’ve been watching Dr. Tenpenny for months. She’s fabulous. One of my co-workers is on the fence about what’s really going on … and I gave her Dr. Tenpenny as a reference. I’m hoping she’ll watch at least one of her interviews. Dr. T has an amazing ability to explain the medical jargon in digestible bites. Like the financial system, people complain it’s too complex as a way not to deal with it. The vax issue is no different and anyone can absorb the material well enough to make up their own mind. And yes, I do feel a momentum change. The moms (and dads) fighting the school boards on masks, CRT, vaccines, etc … is just the beginning.

Comments are closed.