Perspectives On The Pandemic | Knut Wittkowski | Episode 5 BitChute
Perspectives on the Pandemic Episode 5: In this highly charged follow-up interview, Knut Wittkowski says his initial claim has been vindicated: The lockdowns—always a dubious proposition for a respiratory virus—came too late in the U.S. and elsewhere, and were therefore even worse than useless. By turns emotional and darkly comic, Wittkowski ranges across all the essential topics of the crisis, and gives answers you are unlikely to see in the major media. Not to be missed.
All Five episodes of Perspectives on the Pandemic were pulled from YouTube:
Perspectives On The Pandemic | Knut Wittkowski | Episode 2 BitChute
Interview with Dr. Erickson:
Dr. Erickson Interviews Dr. Wittkowski
Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi own and run an urgent care facility in Kern County, CA.
YouTube has taken the video down. You can no longer view at MSN.
You can view at banned.video
Why lockdowns are the wrong policy: Swedish expert Prof. Johan Giesecke (YouTube)
Signed up to Bitchute. I was able to watch it there.
Thanks! We will update to Bitchute.
Censored. I could not access because of yt.
From a Subscriber:
As the debate begins as to how we as individuals, locales and the country as a whole should begin emerging from the response to what the World Health Organization has labeled the COVID-19 pandemic, I sense that the discussion has begun taking a potentially ugly turn. The message is coming from the media that if someone is not entirely on board with continued social distancing, comprehensive testing and contact tracing with mandatory quarantines, and vaccination with certificates of immunity, then they have a callous disregard for human life.
As a contribution to the conversation, I offer observations on the media and my personal experience in the prison where I am medical director for 2500 inmates. At the end I have included a link to a 66 minute video sent to me by a valued source for your consideration.
A news item today states that the county where my prison is located, “…has the highest per-capita coronavirus infection rate in the U.S” The county population is about 8000. We were the first prison in the state to do nasal swab tests on all 2800 inmates and staff; approximately half tested positive. I don’t know what percentage of the county denizens have been tested. I would guess it’s relatively small, but if you throw in the prison numbers it pushes us to the top spot. A second article in the local paper referring specifically to the prison says, “…the number of those actively sickened by COVID-19 puts the facility as the fifth largest coronavirus outbreak in the country as of Tuesday (5/12).”
From the above, a reasonable person could conclude that our medical staff has been inundated with hundreds of seriously ill inmates. First we must ask what the news media mean by “infection rate.” To a physician, to say someone is infected means that they are sick. Out of 2800 individuals, we have sent 8 to the hospital with pneumonia we think is due to SAR-COV-2. They are elderly with underlying chronic diseases. Two have died, one is critically ill, one is convalescing after having been very ill, three were just admitted and are stable, and one has recovered and returned to the prison. We will likely get additional serious cases, but currently the hospitalization rate is 2 ½ per thousand. While we are always saddened to lose anyone, these numbers are similar to what we as a country experience each year due to seasonal influenza.
98% of those that tested positive are without symptoms of any kind, and the remaining 2% have mild cold-type complaints. So the numbers tell us that having the virus in one’s nose on testing does not translate to serious illness for the vast majority of healthy individuals below the age of 65. The media translated a finding of virus in the nose to “infection” and “actively sickened.”
The past couple of weeks I’ve been conducting open sick call as in, “Here I am, who wants to see a doctor?” I’ve been to about half the housing areas and so far I have encountered no one who has been seriously ill. My colleagues report the same. I counsel a few who say they’ve lost their sense of smell and want reassurance they’re not going to die. And so far that’s it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Avc6_ftzk3w&t=1560s
According to a new study in Italy, by Dr. Pasquale Bacco at a private company Meleam SpA working in occupational medicine, about one third of all Italians have already had “the thing” everybody is talking about; moreover, “it” was circulating in Italy as early as Oct. 2019. Currently over 7,000 persons have joined the test, thus making it statistically significant. I was unable to find articles in English but below is an example article and an interview (in Italian);(at the time of writing the article, 1,700 persons had been tested). Various conclusions can be drawn on the basis of such “spreading” in the population:
1) It is drastically less likely to produce fatalities/ER admissions than officialdom has proclaimed;
2) A degree of immunity is produced as in other cases involving the “Corona family”.
3) “Lockdown” was a mistaken approach (but we already knew that).
In recent interviews, Dr. Bacco has stressed that given the arising of new strains, the approach is not a vaccine to prevent it (anybody with a little “grey matter” knew that too), but pharmaceuticals to cure it.
Anyway, as soon as I can find the entire study I’ll post it.
Sample article from April 22nd:
https://www.statoquotidiano.it/22/04/2020/pasquale-bacco-il-virus-in-italia-da-ottobre-ha-infettato-il-35-della-popolazione/759850/
Sample YT interview from an independent channel, 300k views:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8czMPZdAU8
Excellent interview, great depth of feeling but very measured and articulate commentary by the Dr. Whether the virus is “natural” or not appears less relevant now, if Dr. Wittkowski is correct, and heaven knows he is very qualified to make definitive statements. The data demonstrates that the peak has passed and the virus’s impact is no more deadly than the annual flu, nor more prevalent in spite of the media frenzy over hot spots.
In Australia the PM has commented that the restrictions won’t completely lift until there is a vaccine, which is both absurd (given infections are already waning) and ominous (suggestive of the real agenda).
Thanks for this post. Great content! Chris Martenson is really waking up and did a presentation where he references research on the virus structure and breaks it down leading to the assertion that this points to this not being a “natural” virus. Coronavirus: Are Our Scientists Lying To Us? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZUJhKUbd0k
Why is the official world avoiding the term “bioweapon”? It is not because they don’t want to scare the masses of people (they have been doing little else recently!) but because of insurance-related issues: mention or suggestion that there is a “weapon” involved might imply a “war”, and in most policies that eventuality, like an “act of God”, enables them not to pay you damages. Could it be (a question for Catherine) that “they” are making insurance-related arrangements to see that only the right parties will get payouts leaving everybody else in the lurch, when the “war against the invisible enemy” is actually formally stated to be a “war”? My high octane speculation.
Very good insight. Much of what is happening in the health area is organized around insurance liability and management. If you look at the history of vaccines there are so many instances where the virus + vaccine appears to run cover for death caused by government or corporate actions for which they are liable. Instead you blame a virus, make money on a vaccine, in the meantime the corporations stop using, for example, the pesticide that caused the problem, and then when the deaths stop, it is attributed to the vaccine. It is quite cleaver. and it keeps working. Bottom line, the more we can figure out the insurance impact and pressures, the more we are likely to understand what is happening.