A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):

Theme: Private Equity: Porkfest or Criminal Syndicates?

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


Similar Posts

63 Comments

  1. Water used by dishwashers is nothing compared to fracking for oil and gas. Fracking water is not reusable.

  2. Ross Perot had so much money that he could buy the time on the MSM to be heard.
    When his daughter was getting married and Ross was worried about the press interfering with her wedding.
    Perot went silent until after the wedding and then restarted his campaign for presidency. That delay hurt Perot.

  3. And, Catherine, we’ll have to detonate our FINANCIAL NUCLEAR WAR before the money goes digital!

  4. Catherine, if we have no recourse regarding the DEMAND FOR AUDIT, of all the forms you offer, you might consider a FORM LETTER for the COMMON LAW OF OFFSET against the MISSING MONEY so people can eradicate their debts!!!!!!! That would be an incredible way, perhaps, to communicate the seriousness of the DEMAND FOR AUDIT. Consider it PART 2 of STRATEGY for “our financial nuclear war.” Thanks!

  5. Catherine, so happy you made Skidmore update public. Thank you. Please pursue more visibility online to build momentum on DEMAND FOR AUDIT. This is critical. While globalists are threatening nuclear war, we can go on the offense with, as you say, our “financial nuclear war.”

  6. Obviously the thing to do (at this moment in history) with the Pfizer documents would be to unleash an AI on them, prompted to find instances of illegal activity, crimes against humanity, etc. If the documents were open sourced, it’s very likely that a volunteer operation would pop up to do this.

  7. i think NATO is emptying Europe of its weapons to “help” a Russian invasion: within 2 years, Ukraine will lose to Russia, the EU will be foolish enough yo declare official war on Russia which will give green light for it to invade Europe, and the US will go loose on the battlefield there. Europe has always been a target (immigration, young leaders etc) and it will be finished off then.

    2. Arabella, this is a great. Where can we find other states Emergency Preparedness Amendments?

      1. Pleasure – sorry don’t know Caroline. Can’t take credit for the primary research – just pass on things I come across that pass an initial smell test.

  9. In this episode you mentioned how important humor is when discussing current events and had an article from the Babylon Bee.

    Not too many episodes back, Catherine, you mentioned C.J. Hopkins and his Consent Factory site. I had never heard of him prior to that episode, but I checked him out because of the high praise you gave him. Long story short, I’ve ended up buying every book I can find from him and visit his consentfactory.org site most weeks. He is incredibly funny and insightful, and I think viewers here would find is political satire very humorous if they are not already aware of him.

    I told my brother and father about Hopkins, and they’ve also bought his books (they live in a different state) and are now hooked on him as well.

    Just thought I’d bring his attention to subscribers here if they are not aware of him. He is brilliant and hilarious and has a very integrated overview of world events and the money and power structures that drive them.

    His October 16, 2022, Consent Factory essay, “The Gaslighting of the Masses” is not to be missed, absolutely brilliant.

    Thank you for your continued laughter and light-heartedness.

    1. CJ Kept me laughing through the 2016 Presidential election and Trump Administration. 2020 election was harder to laugh, but he sure helped.

  11. Too soon for me to say whether this is pattern yet. But, in my line of work, I’d expect I’d be seeing efforts at correlation studies out of the health insurance companies (who hold all the data), on relatedness of convid vaccines to, for instance, stroke or pneumonia ect. It’d could be done by insurers with a maybe little more than a 30 day lag time. What isn’t being documented bothers me a lot because I work in healthcare and I’m trained to think in terms of risk factors. When I see a stroke, especially in a younger person, I’m going to start looking for the risk and making mental notes about risk factors we’d want to address with the stroke victim once stable- obesity or heart beat irregularities ect. A question that’s always in the back of mind (though it isn’t any official risk factor and isn’t ever spoken out loud so far as I’m aware) is “did this stroke (for instance) patient have a covid vaccine?” Healthcare people, especially those who look at a lot of records in a day, well, I’d think I’m not the only one who is thinking in terms of vaccine as possible risk, and is wanting to assess fully. But the thing that bothers me is that the record of vaccine or no vaccine doesn’t seem to be there in the acute illness situations. If no one is asking the question and recording it in the records, then healthcare people (if only in their own minds) can’t notice a trend of correlation between vaccine, and say, stroke. What about the health insurance companies and managed medicare/medicaid health plans? I’d think there’d be some effort here at correlation analysis, if only in the insurer interests of pinpointing any increased costs related to vaccination. But no, in my corner of the world this is not happening. In my corner of the world, it seems almost like asking about and/or posting vaccination status to the records, so that alert healthcare people might start correlating (if only in their own minds), stopped some time ago. These would be such quick and easy data analytics correlation studies to do, for a managed care health insurer. Why isn’t anyone doing it? No one that I’m aware of any way. They want to combat “misinformation”?, well, how about real information? no one is doing anything with the cheap and readily accessible information that’s out there. Not that I can see. There are some places where I’m still seeing a record of vaccination status (mainly in assessments of compliance in non acute situations) but I personally am not seeing it in acute illness situations

    2. Until a hedge fund analyst buys those data sets independently and combines them for profitable evaluation of risk pools.

    3. This is my UK data. These are preliminary figures, and I’ll remind you of the saying : Lies, dammed lies, and government statistics. I have queries pending with our Office for National Statistics that may help. Use with great caution!
      730 Day EXPERIMENTAL BIOWEAPON
      Survival Rates per Jab excess death
      Ages_____________Survived
      16-17______________19,999
      18-39______________11,799
      40_44_______________4,099
      45_49______________25,299
      50_54_______________3,799
      55_59_______________1,584
      60_64_______________1,299
      65_69_______________3,699
      70_74_________________759
      75_79_________________340
      80_85_________________499
      85_89_________________311
      90+____________________73

      1. Don’t understand the data. How may took them vs how many survived.

  12. What happened that triggered the flooding of the country was the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, which was a blow to the hundreds of years of free or nearly free labor. This necessitated the need to replace that free labor. So came the Immigration Act of 1965, allowing the herd to expand for greater exploitation. Prior to the Immigration Act less than 4% of the population was anything other than Western European descendants and descendants of slavery. The ’64 Civil Rights Act was the impetus of the great reconstruction of America.

  13. At 20:50 Catherine said that deSantis was a “trickster”. Question is for me is he more of a trickster than “Slick Willie” Bill Clinton was as Gov of Arkansas in the ’80’s and as Prez in the ’90’s, or more than “Tricky Dick” Richard Nixon was in ’69 thru ’73? Which feeds into the Mexican immigration explosion comment at 29:00 in 1972, when Nixon was Prez. What did Nixon and/or his supporters and/or Congress have up their collective sleeves in 1972? It couldn’t be just to have more farm labor to harvest crops in the Imperial Valley of Calif, the Rio Grande Valley in Texas, or the border farms in Ariz.

    1. Here’s a great visualization of the “Mexican immigration explosion” in 1972 and beyond. Start at 3:30 in this video for context from 1960 (or watch the whole thing from 1820 to 2023): https://youtu.be/SDcln5ZDnOA

  14. What happened to the video player? I appreciate the ability to change the playback speed, and it is no longer available in the new format.

    Please bring back the former video player or add the ability to change the playback speed to the new format.

    1. My apologies. We had an issue with our master video server. I expect it will soon be fixed and then it will all be back to normal. Thank you for your patience.

  15. Argentina? Read the book, “This time will be different” by Ken Roghoff and Carmen Reinhart. No other country has gone bankrupt more times than Argentina …. starting in the 1800s with British bailouts. Other books strongly suggest that the country has long been some kind of ‘demo’ project for elite intelligence agencies … CIA is only the most recent caretaker of Argentina. No wonder they have privileged access to IMF and World Bank funds.

  17. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart–Celler Act. The 1965 Act marked a change from past U.S. policy which had discriminated against non-northern Europeans. In removing racial and national barriers the Act would significantly alter the demographic mix in the U.S..

    1. If I am correct Sen. Ted Kennedy was involved with that because he stated that America was “ too white”. Some would say that that signaled the beginning of the erosion of our cultural cohesion with shared national values. Racist in my book.

      1. It is not a surprise that this act was pushed by two individuals who were not WASPs.

  18. I cannot get the video to work. Please Solari team if you would fix this so we can see the MP4. I like looking at the graphics as they discuss issues. I hope you will check the video to be sure it functions for would-be viewers. Thank you!

    1. Should be working. Can you let me know. If not, let me know what browser you are using and your ISP. Thanks.

  20. I love this show, but I have to pause it here and now and make my first-ever comment. What’s the deal here with sharing the video about immigration and linking Mexicans to drugs? That’s a really dangerous correlation to assert. The influx of Europeans in the 19th century correlated very highly with genocide. Why not mention that? Do either of you have any contact with Mexicans? Seems not. They are wonderful, hard-working people who have largely built this country in the recent decades. And Mexican immigration interfering with productivity is an absurd claim made without presenting any evidence. How many big companies profit from exploiting illegal labor? Doesn’t that meet your narrow “productivity” requirement? And no mention of US foreign policy destabilizing other countries in the region so people seek safety here? No recognition of these people as potential victims, is callous at best, when you know they are being used as political footballs, just like immigrants in Europe. Remember drug gangs in Central America are a US export. We destabilized their countries, profited off their civil wars, accepted refugees who we settled into our ghettos. Their kids were poor and naturally joined gangs (to deal CIA drugs) and when caught were deported back to their home countries where they continued their devastation. Only recently El Salvador (which is also trying to get off the dollar, coincidentally) has finally broken this cycle of US created and directed violence and people are returning there from the US. Of course, no mention of this. This “discussion” is one of the poorest and lacking in nuance I’ve ever see on this show. Do not forget you both are the decedents of immigrants. Don’t buy into the double-standards and fear-mongering of the mainstream Right of this country. You guys need to do better on this one.

    1. We also share a 1,933 mile long land border with 100+ million Mexicans who we have made sure have stayed poor and insecure. So it should be no surprise they are coming here, leaving their homes and families.

      1. I lived in Adams Morgan neighborhood in DC for 5 years in the 1990’s… with the Central American refugees created by violent US military actions in service to evil Trans National Corporations/Central Banksters. Empire Diaries writ large right next door… We need to stop our military. With a mentally DOA congress? I do not know how. But we have too.

      2. This appears to me to be ignorant of Mexican culture and politics which are the main reasons they are relatively poor.

        1. Please tell me about the culture that keeps them poor. I’ve lived and worked in Mexico and worked with Mexicans here and could say they have a better work ethic than a lot of people here. However, I don’t think drawing broad generalizations about certain types of people to be helpful, because it leads to scapegoating and the targeting of innocent people. We know larger forces are at play. Shining a light on those forces is what this show is normally about, which is why I commented when the only comments on immigration were 1) that they bring drugs 2) that the reduce productivity and 3) don’t integrate into society without providing evidence to support those claims nor anything about how they get here, who is funding them and what percentage of the millions are actually causing “problems”.

    2. My coverage of the narcotics trafficking in Mexico and Latin American over the last 20 years has repeatedly emphasized that it was driven by the United States – intelligence agencies, military, corporations and investors. I have reaffirmed that fact so many times, probably never occurred to me to reaffirm the obvious again. Will listen to this show, but will describe next time, including all the links on Solari’s historical coverage of narcotics trafficking.
      Here are some of the historical coverage if you have not read, highly recommended
      https://dillonreadandco.com/
      https://home.solari.com/money-markets-report-may-18-2023/
      https://home.solari.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/scoop_narco_dummies.htm

    3. “Do either of you have any contact with Mexicans? Seems not.”
      I wrote and produced a documentary (Bailout, 2012) in which I take a road trip to Las Vegas with four friends. Two of them (Ruben Castillo and Sergio Mayora) are Mexicans. Even a modicum of research on your part would’ve saved you from making such a trivially refutable mistake, something you might keep in mind before leading with your chin again on personal matters you know zero about.
      https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1928331/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm
      Ruben died in August 2015. Sergio and I are actually so close that we lived together for two years and remain in contact several times a week to this day. He grew up in one of the poorest neighborhoods in Chicago and was instrumental in helping me understand that huge swaths of people can’t afford to trust the news–and why. So spare me your condescending lecture. (“They are wonderful, hard-working people who have largely built this country in the recent decades.”) Seriously? Did you hear that on NPR?
      The theme of the show was “Private Equity: Porkfest or Criminal Syndicates?” The stories on immigration were tied directly to Blackstone’s exploitation of immigrant child labor. I don’t see any reflection of that in your comment. Frankly I don’t even know what you’re on about. Maybe if you used quotes and timestamps instead of personal insults I would, but honestly that ship sailed when you hit the post button.

      1. I felt there was no nuance on the commentary on the video on immigration. Linking Mexican immigration with an increase in societal problems without mentioning at the larger picture seemed to scapegoat individuals coming here rather than the forces controlling them. It makes sense if you both have detailed the larger picture before and with the link to the following story, but perhaps I needed it to be explicit. I admit I fell into the trap of assuming something about your experience with Mexicans (a point, which I take, and retract), but you did too, with the NPR comment. My comment was simply based on my experience working with them across this country over the past 25 years.

          1. I have to admit it was a good one. I did chuckle at it. Always appreciate your cracks…

    4. Wow, talk about lack of nuance… It is a fact that the immigration laws changed in the 70s, blocking Europeans and favoring Latins. There is no value judgement in that statement of fact. The drug trade is also a fact, rising over the years since the border restriction began relaxing. Also no value judgement there. I didn’t hear either Catherine or John say anything derogatory about Mexicans. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
      Here’s another fact: before Obummer took over, Latin immigrants generally came here to work, ie to pull their weight, either as permanent residents or, as temporary workers. Latin culture is very family oriented, and it is actually not that common for them to want to split up their families permanently. Even many Latins who came for extended periods planned to go back to their home countries when they had “made their nut,” so to speak.
      However, after that criminal took over, something like 25 fed gov agencies began flooding Latin airwaves with ads IN SPANISH, OF COURSE telling them all the ways Latins could get free money courtesy of you and me. The quality of the immigrants obviously changed. They no longer came to work, they came to be welfare queens. That is also a fact.
      There is big money to be made in the illegal drug trade. Have you entered the biz? And if not, why not? Could it be that people of honesty and integrity typically don’t want to sell street drugs knowing what they do to addicts? It is of course mainly the USG that created this horrendous state of affairs, but it takes two to tango.
      And, tell me, what kind of mother, especially a Latin mother, would send her underage girl BY HERSELF to another country? Don’t give me the line, “a poor one.” Poverty doesn’t create lousy parents. Lousy parents create poverty.
      None of this is in any way an insult to Mexicans. It is fact, and observations about some people in the world.
      We get enough of the juvenile taking-offence all around us in our daily lives. Do you have to bring it to this sanctuary of reason?

  23. Hi Catherine, I’d welcome your views on EVENT201, specifically Segment 1 : 

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vm1-DnxRiPM

    If you can only afford a couple of minutes, please start from 00:24:00
    Thanks

    1. Kennedy gives the best description of this. Pretty obvious what is happening.

      1. I’d describe EVENT201 as theatre, with the actors, including Johnston and Johnston, given their script in Segment 1. My guess is that their script was written by someone with little medical knowledge.
        And thanks for your reply.

  24. Senator John Kennedy questions SVB and Signature Bank executives, 6 min. legendary clip, “55% of your assets in government bonds and you don’t know whether you were hedged?” … “Pronoun meetings?” …
    https://youtu.be/M_cUUtbYH3c

  27. Red alert, pure evil:
    “This evidence report reveals how the World Health Organization and United Nations are sexualizing little children in primary education worldwide, for the purpose of normalizing pedophilia. This report consists of nothing but solid evidence, with many official documents, videos, books, archives, etc.”
    https://stopworldcontrol.com/children/

  28. Lying AI bot.

    James Corbett via Dr. Mercola:

    Dr. Mercola and James Corbett.

    I’ve often marveled at the effectiveness of modern propaganda. Part of what makes it so effective is the availability of technology, from social media and search engines to large language model artificial intelligence. OpenAI’s ChatGPT has taken the world by storm and companies across a range of industries are already talking about replacing large numbers of white collar workers with AI.
    This, even though there are serious problems with this technology. For example, we’re finding chatbots have a tendency to lie and fantasize. Researchers are calling these instances “hallucinations.” Basically, the AI is concocting a fantasy based on the information available and reciting it as fact. And that’s in addition to the bias that can be built in by programmers. So, while it’s an incredibly exciting technology, we cannot be naïve about its risks.
    One obvious risk is that state-endorsed propaganda can become the only information available to people, as this technology starts monopolizing online searches and virtual assistants.
    There won’t be a multitude of answers anymore. There will only be one, and he who controls the AI will have the power to control the beliefs of the entire world. Of course, yet another risk is that no one will be able to control it and the AI will control itself. I don’t know which might be worse.

    Corbett comments:

    “You introduced this topic with the concept of propaganda and potential uses of large language models for propagandistic purposes. We should go back to the man who wrote the book on propaganda called ‘Propaganda,’ Edward Bernays, who [said]:

    ‘The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government, which is the true ruling power of our country.’

    That was Edward Bernays in 1928. His words are as true today as they were then, perhaps even more so. And the true ruling power of the country, of the world at this point perhaps, are those who can most effectively, consciously and intelligently manipulate the organized habits and opinions of the masses.

    And I don’t think enough people have really stopped to cogitate on the fact that these large language models already starting to produce material that really cannot be distinguished from human-written material …

    You don’t have to be a crystal ball prognosticator to see how this will extend out in the foreseeable future … [to] the point where you can have entire conversations, entire fields of interest and study that will be completely populated by artificial-created conversation …

    A large language model that is able to accurately and without much prompting be able to populate botnets to flood social media and other places will essentially be able to dominate that conversation, [and] will consciously and intelligently manipulate the habits and opinions of the masses. At that point, you are talking about the ultimate weapon.

    The ultimate weapon is narrative, because with a convincing-enough narrative, you can get entire populations motivated to war or to anything else that you seek to get them to do, like say lock down the entire productive global economy on the back of a scare that was absolutely not warranted.

    So, I think once we start getting these completely synthetically-generated narratives, that will start creating these entire events that are not happening in the real world. [These events] will be deep-faked through video and audio and everything else, to convince you of an entire reality that doesn’t exist.

    We are really moving into some truly world historical changing times and I don’t know if enough people are really cognizant of … how this technology could be used for good or for ill …

    I think there is a real threat, and it is probably underappreciated by a large section of the public that are not keeping abreast of the daily torrent of information on this subject … Some of the testing notes for ChatGPT-4 that were released showed there was a team that was tasking the chatbot with a certain task that would require it to do things that it was not programmed to do, or even authorized to do, including solving a CAPTCHA …

    [The chatbot] actually went on Fiverr or one of those types of platforms and recruited a human being to do it for it, to the point where the human said, ‘Why are you recruiting me to do a CAPTCHA? How do I know you’re not a bot? Ha-ha-ha.’ To which it responded, ‘I’m blind, I’m visually impaired, I can’t do it myself.’ Ultimately, it ended up getting that CAPTCHA solved.

    It does not take a great degree of imagination to see where that can go. I don’t know what kind of safeguards you can program into a technology like that, other than to completely keep it firewalled off from the internet and from any other computer system that it may be able to commandeer.”

    1. I have seen ChatGPT in action in a game, it is creepy to say the least. That the thing is able to lie does not surprise me.

Comments are closed.