On December 1st, 2023 Catherine presents to the Croatian Parliament in Zagreb to discuss digital transformation of the financial systems and its potential consequences.

An overview of the conference can be found here. The livestream can be found here.

Here are Catherine’s Musings from Croatia on the conference:

Numerous members of our network are in Zagreb Croatia for the presentations to the Croatian parliament. Several members, including Meryl Nass, Renate Holzeisen and Philipp Kruse have been on the road, actively educating political and government leaders in US and Europe to try to end support for the WHO Amendments, Treaty, funding and membership.

The clear feedback from numerous countries is:

  • They are in an economic vise, including a debt-trap;
  • They do not want to be alone in resisting the WHO.

Clear message — we need proposals to help these countries get out of their debt trap together.

Renate and Philipp both gave excellent presentations yesterday on their litigation and challenges to the EMA and Swiss Medic – they have spent several years documenting the criminality of what has happened through the health care system.

Through their presentations and conversations, I was reminded that their core legal practice is based in business — tax for Philipp and business legal advice and litigation for Renate. Their brief descriptions of some of the problems the businesses they have worked with face aligned with what I and my allies have observed. I spent several days in Switzerland this summer listening to what is happening to the small and medium size and even large companies that are the real economic muscle in Europe. I heard the same in the US during October and November.

Unfortunately, Richard Werner was not able to join us this weekend — he is a critical participant in these conversations on both economic growth and banking.

It is not just the political leaders who are in an economic vise, so are the business leaders. The loss of political sovereignty is being used to extract economic value from business and markets — again in a way that centralizes wealth but shrinks total wealth. This group includes enterprises in critical areas such as manufacturing, agriculture, energy, investment and banking. In Solari’s investment screen company, we regularly review such companies and observe the heavy expense the pandemic and increasing central control has added to their management and business and ability to trade.

Of course, the problems are compounded by the general poisoning of the population and the rise of all cause mortality. Part of solutions are businesses and practices that help people be healthy, including regenerative agriculture.

How do we gather the right group of people to help each other with a system wide economic and political solution? Renate has regularly emphasized the importance of engaging with the entrepreneurs. We just spoke again about this — she has an excellent grasp on the situation.

The EU decision to move forward with the digital ID accelerates the pressure to do so. A combination of digital ID making possible complete financial transaction control with the WHO amendments and treaty — not to mention what the UN accomplishes with its future summit and one health system in 2024 – creates a powerful economic trap.

The economic and financial trap is used to enforce the political and legal trap. How do we develop a wealth building response that gets entrepreneurs and business/investment/banking leaders and political leaders out of the power and sovereignty draining trap together?

One way to raise the question may be to invite the family offices and their donor advised funds, particularly family offices with major positions in operating enterprises, to come out of the shadows to play a leadership role in the dialogue. We need wealth building solutions, rather than remaining isolated while our economic productivity and family wealth continues to be extracted and drained.


Similar Posts

11 Comments

  1. I am fully on board for this but it will be a challenge if we are to successfully approach family offices. Some of the challenges / options i see are:

    1. We need a presentation that explains the situation w/out anything that might seem like a conspiracy theory. The psyop has been so successful that it is impossible to have a factual dialogue if one of these topics in touched. I believe there is now sufficient data to do so, but it will still be one hell of a job.
    2. Maybe i am wrong but say you created a fund that would invest in SMEs with critical local produce in say Food, Manufacturing (perhaps only those 2). The investment horizon would be long, given that the stock markets are being pumped. So the pitch is more on being robust, thanviding a return. I am insufficiently educated in Finance to determine whether there is ever a rationale sufficiently convincing to make such an investment.
    3. We may be able to build a dynamic city/region model where investors could play out different scenarios. Again, the input of the scenarios cannot be ‘almost everybody dies because of vaccines’ because that will defeat the purpose. But it could be another pandemic with lock downs etc. and what that would do to the city/region. AND, most importantly, what might happen if we are able to make the city/region more robust, more resilient through directed investment and management. Because part of the proposition would have to be proper financial management of SMEs like we discussed earlier, Catherine.

    Let’s see if we can build a Solari Alliance here.

    1. Gerdt:

      Excellent comments.

      I think food is the easy case. I don’t think you need to argue for short term returns on the food side. I think the notion of eating pharma food and unhealthy children does the sell for you = this is about being healthy. You just have to organize it so it is long term econnomically productive. That will require integrating technology and ongoing research in an effective way.

      1. Lets start with food then. One sector at a time. There will be a lot of competition though given that everybody is investing in land. So we need to figure out an alternative strategy than just buying up producers.

        1. I really like your idea. Perhaps there are local opportunities that could start the process. I will explain a possibility I saw where I am located, but I failed to get any traction. I will explain below what happened. I don’t know if it adds value to the discussion, I hope it does.
          Shortly after I moved to Palm Beach County, Florida, I received an email regarding an Ag Reserve area. It seems that years ago, there was an Ag Reserve Area set up and taxpayer money was used to buy up some of the property in the area. The email that I received was regarding a housing developer wanting to buy a chunk of the property (privately owned) and turn it into a housing development. I went to the commission meeting, those opposed pointed out that the same developer had previously bought parcels and if this sold, it would essential kill the Ag Reserve, because so much had been turned into housing. The meeting, requested by the developed, was about tabling the vote. This was because the developer did not have enough yes votes, on the Commission, for his project. People opposed wanted the vote that day. Of course, it goes without saying, the vote was tabled.
          I had called many of the organizations who opposed the sale. I told them that if you do not have a plan, the property will be pick off, little by little, until nothing was left. I wanted to work with them on a plan. I explained that I was from Northern California and years ago Ellen Straus and Phyllis Faber started the Marin Agricultural Trust (MALT) in Marin County. I explained that they had saved over 55,000 acres of Marin farmland. I thought maybe we could use this a a blueprint. My impression from the feedback was that they had fought the fight so long and were not interested in a different approach.
          MALT is a great example of many things. Private donors to help farmers keep their land. I was a donor for many years, my payback was a wonderful ride through the hills of Marin with green grass and cows – worth every cent. A while ago, The Highwire had a rancher on their show who said he could not take his cows to market – in english, slaughter them, because there were so few facilities in the USA. I emailed The Highwire and told them how MALT had this problem when I lived there and how they solved the problem by forming a California group of ranchers sharing a mobile facility. They thanked me and I believe pass the idea on.
          We must all work together to find a better way. I know the largest hearts and brains are on our side, together we can slay the dragon.

  2. Great information, CAF! Extricating ourselves, and our local economies, from the international scale of control and theft of the value of what we all produce with our work seems key to me. We need to re-focus our economic investments in local, small-scale business that serves local and regional needs and markets. Every bit of wealth extracted by the management of large-scale business enterprise is just pure overhead. So a systematic down-scaling of our markets is needed, which has the tendency to design the globalist grifters out of the economic system. Maximizing self-sufficiency can be one goal, at any scale. Most countries should look at import substitution. The societal costs of outsourcing our needs is too great to sustain, in virtually every country. And many of those costs just aren’t counted by the people who indebt us all. My conversations with John Perkins (author of “Confessions of an Economic Hitman”) convinced me that the economics used to justify the creation of the debt traps that countries find themselves in today were junk economics – deliberately designed to entrap the debtor nations in order to confiscate the wealth generated by their economies. Serving local markets first mostly eliminates this trap. It may take a bit of time for the transition but going back to the future will pay dividends in the longer run.

    1. Absolutely junk economics. QUestion is how we protect the local from the international extractions.

  3. Was this for the parliamentarians themselves? If so, Bravo! A conference like this would never happen in parliament here

    1. I have sent a request to the organizers. They are planning to produce the indiviual videos. May take a bit, so stay tuned.

Comments are closed.