By Catherine Austin Fitts
“The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.”
~ Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince
We are watching a disturbing confluence of forces come together later this month.
First, there are repeated reports that the federal budget will not be finalized by the September 30 deadline. This means that both the new fiscal budget and a needed increase in the debt limit will be in flux when the Pope addresses a joint session of Congress on September 24. The next day he will address the UN General Assembly, followed by a mass on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway in Philadelphia on Sunday, September 27.
On September 26, a final meeting on the TransPacific Partnership is scheduled in Atlanta.
On Monday, September 28, with the U.S federal budget still presumably in play, the following world leaders will address the UN General Assembly:
- Obama
- Xi Jinping
- Putin
- Hollande
- Rouhani
- others
There are rumors that Hollande will propose a Palestinian state. What is not a rumor is the UN’s new Post-2015 Development Agenda. This is being referred to as Agenda 21 on steroids.
Why am I concerned that the UN Development Agenda will pop out of the Pope’s mouth on a wave of highly juicy entrainment and propaganda? Or that it will land nicely pre-engineereed into the federal budget? Or that all the hungry domestic and global constituents will press for passage so that their October checks will arrive without interruption?
I’ll tell you why: because I have seen this kind of “sneak attack” before.
Let’s hope that my fears are unfounded. However, if you think HUD’s latest round of top-down control of local communities is bad, wait until you see the UN’s new agenda:
Related Reading:
Here is another article from Zerohedge that seems to more accurately discuss the hidden goals of the UN 2030 Agenda:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-10/uns-sustainable-development-agenda-basically-giant-corporatist-fraud
Just also ran across this article on Zerohedge stating that due to military activities, much of the East Coast aerial surveillance will be impaired from Sept. 2nd – Oct. 1st. Looks like it’s mostly to the south, but the article makes reference to the fact that the whole East Coast will be affected…
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-08/us-aerial-surveillance-impaired-east-coast-until-october-1st-due-military-activities
Hi Catherine,
We have really appreciated your recent reports and discussions on this Fall and the UN 2030 Agenda. The UN 2030 Agenda is so euphoric that it’s scarey, and the timing with the US budget is interesting. Of course we would all like to live in a world without hunger, war or poisons. However, it’s the same people, organizations and governments proposing the solution who are for the most part responsible for the atrocities. Upon pondering this, we became concerned about what the true implications of this UN 2030 Agenda could be. We searched the web looking for feedback from our more trusted thinkers and found very little. In fact as you mentioned, there is hardly anything in the news about it at all. You have brought it the most light – thank you. Then we ran across this article by the Natural News: http://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html
I must say, that this article does indeed articulate some of the fears that come to mind upon reading the UN 2030 Agenda. What do you think is really behind this quiet, quick, euphoric global plan?
Thank you for all you continue to do, and for your balanced views!
Best,
Jeannie