In Stanley Kubrick’s thriller, Eyes Wide Shut, we watch as Dr. Bill Harford (played by Tom Cruise) attends a private party given by a secret society whose members have the power, among other things, to kill with impunity.

If you have not seen Eyes Wide Shut, I strongly recommend watching it if you want to understand the real privacy issues related to the mandatory health records database proposed by the Administration.

~ View Parts I through VI of this article here.

When I served as Assistant Secretary of Housing, I refused a high level order to break the law, given by a Cabinet Secretary under extreme, terrorizing pressure. (See my blog post, “It’s Hard Out There for a Pimp.”) I had high level government officials indicate that they did not have to obey the law. They “reported to a higher authority.” In Eye’s Wide Shut, Kubrick gives the viewer a remarkable feel for such “higher authorities.”

Watch Eyes Wide Shut and then explain to me how it is that government officials will keep your data private from secret societies like this one. Explain to me how the defense contractors who will be paid to manage the data will keep it private from those who are free to kill with impunity. Who do you think owns the defense contractors in the first place?

Indeed, it is fair to assume these folks would not have to ask for the data. Given their power and access shouldn’t we assume that they already have back door access to government computers? Wasn’t back door access what the rumors about PROMIS software and Microsoft and NSA were all about?

Can they get some of our health care data now? In theory, yes. However, it is time consuming, expensive and many doctors do not keep records in digital form. So as a practical matter, no.

If the government mandates that doctors must maintain digital records and that all of our records be collected and maintained in digital form and they can be accessed and aggregated by the same people who create the currency, own and control the drug companies, credit card and insurance companies and govern narcotics trafficking, how do you think they might use such data?

How long would it be until the records include your DNA and as a practical matter they can use it in whatever way they desire? If they need an organ transplant and you fit the profile, how long until you think you might have an accident?

My father was a very successful doctor. He learned surgery in Burma during WWII while watching the narcotics trade  at the heart of financing Chiang Kai-shek’s army. His office at the University of Pennsylvania Hospital was in a building named “Dulles.” I took his warnings to heart about the very real manipulation and misuse of medical information and records.

Whenever I fill out a form that asks me for the name of my doctor, I write “none.”

~ View Parts I through VI of this article here.

Similar Posts

11 Comments

  1. I was so frustrated beacuse I couldn`t resolve this issue. Then I found your site in google and problem is solved. Thanks!

  2. If this man was alive today and would dare to talk frankly, many questions would find answers
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Rothschild
    Begium has the most cruel history of all ex-colonial powers.
    Brussels serves as capital of the European Union, hosting the major political institutions of the “Union”. Notably the European Union -EU and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation -NATO- S.H.A.P.E have their main institutions in the city.
    The presence of the EU and the other international bodies has for example led to there being more ambassadors and journalists in Brussels than in Washington D.C.
    and Brussels had :
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Dutroux
    All coincidences ?

  3. Catherine, I understand the point you were communicating and agree whole heartedly. I did however miss the point of the nude ones being the slaves, I wasn’t quite sure what was going on in the picture. Thanks for clearing and cleaning it up. I am about to link to some of your content and it helps a lot for my audience if I don’t have to make an “R” rated disclaimer.

    Ed, What you call porn I would call tyranny. Uncovering the nakedness of the wives and daughters in our beautiful community I would call porn.

  5. Paul:

    Good point. I did not mean to be disrespectful. It is very hard for most people to fathom that the leadership controlling our government believe and practice slavery. I included the photographs to attempt to communicate the chilling fact that giving our most intimate data to people who are free to kill with impunity and believe in and practice slavery is not such a wonderful idea.

    Best,

    Catherine

  6. Hey, Paul, I appreciate your concern about “the porn” but a few pictures of naked breasts aren’t going to hurt anyone, including women and children; the “porn” is what is being done to the women and children and the economy and the Constitution and our rights and our healthy, bueautiful communities and world.

  7. Hi
    I found this exceptionally interesting, here in the UK we’ve almost all medical records and everything going towards digital data. I have great concerns related to the security of all this data,I’m a bit of a campaigner on this issue. It would seem that not only all information is to be placed on digital systems, but great efforts are to be made to collect much more information. I believe the whole thing will be managed by private companies, our future will lie in their hands, they will manage everything, whoever “they” are?

  10. Hey great info, I’m enjoying the site – but enough with the porn already! I can’t even read the post if my children are in the room. – How about showing a little respect for us and for our ladies.

Comments are closed.