“Gaslighting is a form of psychological abuse in which a person or group causes someone to question their own sanity, memories, or perception of reality….The term ‘gaslighting’ comes from the name of a 1938 play and 1944 film, Gaslight, in which a husband manipulates his wife into thinking she has a mental illness.” ~ Medical News Today

By Catherine Austin Fitts

Peter Breggin and his brilliant wife Ginger have just published a serious review of The Psychology of Totalitarianism by Mattias Desmet and the dangers of his mass formation theory, in a three-part series.

Highly recommended!

Part One:

Mattias Desmet Demoralizes the Freedom Movement – Mass Hypnosis Expert or Trojan Horse

Part Two:

Mattias Desmet Diagnoses Researchers as Mentally Disturbed – Mass Hypnosis Expert or Trojan Horse

Part Three:

Mattias Desmet Blames the Victims and Absolves the Perpetrators – Mass Hypnosis Expert or Trojan Horse

Related Reading:

Doctor Peter Breggin | Dr. Breggin Asks, “Why Is Doctor Robert Malone a Partner In NIH Activ?” What Is NIH Activ (ACCELERATING COVID-19 THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS AND VACCINES)?

Threats from the Desmet/Malone Mass Formations and Mass Psychosis

Book Review: The Psychology of Totalitarianism by Mattias Desmet

Special Solari Report: Mass Formation: A Decoy for Digital Concentration Camps with Dr. Peter Breggin

The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators

Mattias Desmet: Mass Hypnosis Expert or Trojan Horse? The Full Story – America Out Loud


Similar Posts

8 Comments

  1. I haven’t read this Desmet’s book. I’d recently requested it as an interlibrary loan since unavailable in the Des Moines Public Library. I have read and own Peter and Ginger’s book. In fact I sent a copy of it to the Iowa Attorney General along with the suggestion that he use the 10th Amendment and Prosecute the Criminal COVID Conspirators per David Martin. I’d wanted to attend WAPF Knoxville Conference primarily to heat you Ms. Austin Fitts. Happily, alternatively, I’ve joined Solari instead. I respect the Breggins’ insights. Dr. Malone has been one of Desmet’s more outspoken advocates. Frankly, I have come to feel that Malone, as a virologist, has certain baggage of his own, as a member of that cult which is faithful to the belief in the unproven theory of the existence of viruses and their mythical impact on our health. On the other hand, Malone seems to be aware of the adverse health consequences of his contribution to “science” claiming to have pioneered the RNA “therapy.” THANK YOU Dr. Malone! At least he is on the same page as the Breggins re: Freedom/Liberty! I personally thank Peter Goetche for waking me up to the criminality of pharmaceutical industry; especially Pfizer. Congress, in my opinion, should renew exposure to liability for that criminal enterprise. Additionally, the Biological Weapons Convention ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_Weapons_Convention ) should be enforced and Amerika’s sin’s exposed and atoned for. Thank you Katherine. I’ve respected you since learning about you in Michael Ruppert’s “Crossing the Rubicon” Thank you for all that you are giving us!

    1. My assessment is the Peter Breggin and Malone are on opposite sides of the freedom fight.

  2. Thank you for sharing. I was not aware of Desmet’s stance on elites/conspiracies. I assumed that he believed that the conditions for mass formation were created and capitalized on by the Schwabbies, et al.

    Now, it seems like Desmet is ready to be the leader of the gaslighting campaign, should the masses awaken to what’s been done. He got to practice and polish his message. They can roll him out on CNN and calm the masses by explaining that no elites are to blame. The populace did this to themselves with tragic outcomes.

  3. There has been a change in Desmet since Christmas – slicker, more polished presentation and turnout, and a tweaked message. 12m ago he was very much calling on individuals to hold their own and that only when people stopped speaking up in any tyranny did the slaughter begin. Latterly that part of the message has got lost, the whole has been twisted into victim-blaming and the book doesn’t read as if he wrote it – it’s full of anecdotes that have been in dozens of popular science books that have made the NYT bestseller list in recent years. My take is that he was onto something that was too close to the bone, and has been subverted and is now being discredited. But it feels a shame to me – seemed like a sincere chap.

    1. Have to disagree. Struck me as without authenticity from day one.

      1. No mention of “the committee of 300, Tavistock, ultra secret society of Cincinnati, et al., nor any of Dr. John D. Colemans’ research to reveal those who have been and are the totalitarians.

        Thanks to you and the time we live in they’re ever more visible, or perhaps we are more interested to know more about the power behind the throne, which has such an impact on our lives, as far back as Jesus.

        Loved your conversation and ventilation with Dr. Breggin. Love you too. Blessings.

Comments are closed.