*Bill Gates: America’s Self-Appointed Vaccine Czar*
*Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD*
*Progressive Radio Network, April 24, 2020*
A puzzle that may baffle the inquiring mind is how a college
dropout, a computer nerd without any notable biological or medical
background, and at one time the wealthiest person in the world
before being unseated by the self-centered playboy Jeff Bezos, could
rise to become one of humanity’s leading spokespersons about
vaccination. After transitioning away from Microsoft to work full
time for his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2006, funding
vaccine development and agricultural genetic engineering seems to
have turned into one of Bill Gates’ deeper passion. in the past, he
has been a public protector of Monsanto’s chemical-dependent GMOs
and continues to promote the agro-chemical paradigm throughout the
developing world. Although there is nothing wrong with philanthropic
enterprises for causes we believe in, what is disturbing is that a
non-medical expert has assumed the role of being a national thought
leader on vaccination safety and policy. What people do is less
important than their motivations and intentions.
Personality- wise, it is no secret
Bill Gates was an angry, difficult boss in early Microsoft days—here’s why employees still liked him
Gates was a difficult boss to work with. He was known to be
extremely critical, belligerent, sarcastic and his anger would often
degrade employees. He was a fierce taskmaster as the Washington Post
reported
The crazy thing Bill Gates used to do to monitor workplace productivity
and /Fortune/ magazine listed him
Like It or Not, Egotistical Jerks Make Great Entrepreneursas an
“egotistical jerk” along with other billionaires such Steve Jobs and
Jeff Bezos. Now with COVID-19 upon us, some, such as NPR
Bill Gates, Who Has Warned About Pandemics For Years, On The U.S. Response So Far
would call Gates prophetic for warning about viral pandemics five
years ago. However, there is nothing extraordinarily novel, and
definitely not Delphian, in this pronouncement. Gates is certainly
no oracle. As personal experience confirms, such conversations among
scientists have gone on in the corridors and cafeterias of biotech
firms for over three decades. More likely is Gates simply fear
mongering to turn his enormous investments into vaccine research and
development for a coronavirus vaccine with the outcome being greater
profits?
To call Gates a vaccine and genetic engineering fanatic is an
understatement. While lecturing at the elitist TED 2010 conference
in Long Beach, CA, he slipped a statement while speaking about the
dangers of climate change and over population: “Vaccines? I love
them.” His admission was made in the context of his philanthropic
strategy and vaccines play a crucial role in his firm conviction
that population reduction is an urgent priority for the survival of
humanity. Of course the question that arises is who should be
eliminated from the population? And who is elected from the public
to make such decisions? The short answer is no one. Nevertheless
this agenda is covertly proceeding through foundations,
international agencies, non-profits, and private industry.
In 2000, the Gates Foundation founded the International Finance
Facility for Immunization (GAVI) and that organization’s Global Fund
for Children’s Vaccines. GAVI is a global collaboration that
includes governments health ministries, the Rockefeller Foundation,
the World Bank, WHO, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers, UNICEF, corporate vaccine makers, and other
influential entities. All of these are zealot vaccination promoters.
One of the organization’s goals is to vaccinate every child in
Africa. In 2019, GAVI reported
Facts and figures having
reached over 960 million campaign immunizations in developing
countries.
In his deconstruction of Bill Gates’ charitable agenda, F. William
Engdahl writes Bill Gates talks about ‘vaccines to reduce population’ ,
“Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink feces-polluted river
water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning up
the water and sewage systems of Africa would revolutionize the
health conditions of the Continent.” Far more effective would be the
Foundation donating its billions to improve sanitation and hygiene,
and provide nutrition to the 2.6 billion people who have little to
none, for increasing clean water sources so 900 million global
residents can have access to drinkable water (now at 1 in 3
Africans). Instead, the Foundation could be funding
Summit Failure on Water, Sanitation Would Be Recipe for Disasterthousands
of health clinics focusing on the chronic illnesses these
populations suffer from most. This is simply common sense. “Bad
water,” says the Stockholm International Water Institute’s director,
Anders Bentell
Time Running Out Faster Than Water, Experts Warn
“kills more people than HIV, malaria and war together.” And
globally, contaminated water, which kills approximately 9 million
Pollution kills 9 million people each year, new study finds people
annually, is a far more serious crisis than the evidence now
indicates for coronavirus.
Over the past several years, the prestigious British medical journal
/The Lancet/ has printed a series
What has the Gates Foundation done for global health? of
in-depth analyses of the Gates Foundation with disturbing
revelations. In a September 2008 article, “Misfinancing Global
Health: A Case for Transparency in Disbursements and Decision
Making,” the authors’ investigation came to the conclusion that
aside from excessive funding of high profile Western institutions
and organizations, there was “a heavy bias in funding towards
malaria and HIV/AIDS, with relatively little investment into
tuberculosis, maternal and child health, and nutrition–with chronic
diseases being entirely absent from its spending portfolio.” And a
later study
by
Dr. David McCoy from the Center for International Health found that
“the grants made by the Foundation do not reflect the burden of
disease endured by those in deepest poverty.” None of these findings
have been covered to any extent by mainstream media nor any
governing body. Seemingly Gates is riding on the coat tails of the
COVID-19 panic that has infected much of the global community, when
in fact, some analyses, such as one recently out of Stanford
Perspectives on the Pandemic | Dr. John Ioannidis Update: 4.17.20 | Episode 4,
indicate that the danger is likely over exaggerated.
Earlier this month, Gates announced he would be spending billions of
dollars to fund seven separate coronavirus vaccine development
initiatives. As a result, his Foundation has emerged as perhaps the
foremost leader in the vaccine industry’s response to the pandemic.
Gates has gained free entrance into the offices and boardrooms of
all the leading players savoring the opportunity to launch a
fast-tracked coronavirus vaccine that may likely be made mandatory
for Americans, including National Institutes of Allergies and
Infectious Disease director Anthony Fauci, the CDC’s vaccine
advisory committee and the WHO. Thus far, Gates has shown
reservation against a hasty launch of a vaccine that will likely not
have been reviewed long enough to determine its safety and efficacy
in long-term immunity. During a White House
Philly vaccine pioneer: We can’t rush a coronavirus vaccine | Q&A press
conference with Trump, Fauci indicated a vaccine might take a year
or two before approval. The anti-science Trump replied he would
prefer it were a couple months. There is a strong possibility that
like the influenza vaccine, immunity will wane quickly. We may
recall that Fauci aggressively pushed
Dr. Fauci’s History in Spending Billions of Government Funds on Vaccine Research with Little to Show for it for
fast-tracking the H1N1 flu vaccine during the swine flu epidemic
that never appeared as predicted. He was called out on this failure
by Senator Tom Coburn for advocating a vaccine found to be only 30%
effective in trials conducted in Thailand. Recent studies out of
Shanghai already show that 30 percent of those who contract a wild
COVID-19 virus show only minor or no neutralizing antibodies. And
South Korea is now reporting cases of individuals getting infected
with COVID-19 a second time. Other seasonal coronaviruses, which are
only mild common colds, return repeatedly and indicate infection
triggers only short temporary immune responses
Do You Get Immunity After Recovering From A Case Of Coronavirus? and
even then not in everyone.
However, not all leading vaccine advocates are on board with rushing
a vaccine. During a Philadelphia Inquirer interview
Philly vaccine pioneer: We can’t rush a coronavirus vaccine | Q&Awith
rotavirus vaccine inventor Dr. Paul Offit at the Children’s Hospital
of Philadelphia, Offit warned against efforts being made to get a
vaccine on the market as swiftly as possible. This is a virus,
according to Offit, that we still know very little about. He stated,
“If you’re going to be testing this in otherwise healthy people who
are very, very unlikely to die from this infection, you better make
sure it’s safe.” He offers the example of the poorly developed
dengue vaccine that was tested in Latin America and the Philippines
and found to increase the risk of dengue shock syndrome. The same
could happen with a COVID-19.
Peter Hotez, Dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at
Baylor University, developed a vaccine against SARS in 2016 before
money dried up. Yet in a recent appearance
Dr. Fauci’s History in Spending Billions of Government Funds on Vaccine Research with Little to Show for it before
Congress, he testified a coronavirus vaccine could have a “unique
potential safety problem.” We should be warned that questions would
remain if and whether Hotez’s team were to get a vaccine into
advanced trials. An earlier University of Texas effort
Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. to develop a vaccine
against the SARS coronavirus was appalling. Despite inducing
neutralizing antibodies, all the mice in the trial exhibited
immunopathological events in the lungs. More recently
It could take 5 years for 2 leading COVID-19 vaccines to debut, AI analysis finds ,
a global analytics firm, Clarivate, investigated two COVID19
vaccines in the pipeline that have reached later clinical trials.
Their report estimates that it will require over 5 years for
developing a safe vaccine and it will likely be only 5 percent
effective. In other words, it is an enormous waste of funding.
Gates, on the other hand, seems to be ignoring these warnings from
persons who have devoted their lives to vaccine development. He is
stubbornly determined, irrespective of money spent, to get a COVID19
vaccine onto the market. A question that arises in our minds is how
concerned Gates might be of vaccine safety issues. If the past is
any indication of his priorities, it appears his focus is to
increase vaccine compliance while ignoring the high incidence of
serious adverse events and deaths. Bobby Kennedy Jr. at the
Children’s Health Defense organization has listed
Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination some
of the vaccination debacles that are directly associated with his
Foundation:
·In 2002, operatives in the Gates network enforced a meningitis
campaign in Sub-Sahara Africa that paralyzed up to 500 children.
·In 2010, his foundations support for Glaxo’s experimental malaria
vaccine trials killed 151 African infants and seriously injured
another 1,000.
·Gates collaboration with India’s National Technical Advisory Group
resulted in a catastrophe of unmonitored overlapping polio
immunization programs triggering an epidemic of non-polio acute
flaccid paralysis that affected 490,000 children. Gates vaccine
programs were forced to leave India. Cases of vaccine derived polio
now outnumber
What is vaccine-derived polio?cases
from wild polio.
·In 2014, Foundation funds went to experimental HPV vaccine trials
in India, in joint collaboration with Glaxo and Merck, that violated
ethical standards. Over 1,000 girls developed severe autoimmune
diseases and fertility disorders.
It is easy to overlook the larger significance of the results Gates’
vaccination campaigns. In short, Gates was responsible for
implementing and funding these programs that injured and caused the
deaths of innocent children and adults. Due to his stature among
governmental and international health agencies, he has not been held
accountable. People such as Gates are judged by a different
standard, meaning they are not judged at all. Equally worrisome,
aside from his vaccine frenzy, Gates makes efforts to influence the
nation’s health policies. In the past he has been a fanatical
advocate for mandatory vaccination. During a recent TED Talk
interview
Bill Gates Calls for Vaccine Certificates as Requirement for Travel,
Gates advocated a national campaign to issue certificates for those
who have been either infected with COVID-19 or vaccinated against
it. “Eventually what we’ll have to have is certificates of who’s a
recovered person and who’s a vaccinated person,” he stated, “because
you don’t want people moving around the world… (without their
certificates).”
Gates however is a symptom of another side of national crisis. There
would be no need for citizen billionaires to be taking the helm to
manipulate national policy responses to health crises, such as the
COVC-19 pandemic, if there was in place a functioning healthcare
system. Unfortunately it has been the gross failures of the Trump
and previous presidential administrations that have opened the doors
for others like Gates to step in. For too long, the US’s federal
health agencies have been thoroughly compromised and corrupted by
private pharmaceutical interests. The pandemic is revealing to
Americans that we have the most dysfunctional medical system in the
developed world.
Unfortunately the wealthiest elite on the planet are rarely
questioned about the correctness of their actions and schemes. As
long as a Bill Gates says he is giving huge sums of money to a cause
to end disease and suffering, we are not suppose to probe further.
Rather, in the case of mainstream media, such people are to be
worshiped as saviors. The oligarchic elite are so well
interconnected on multiple boards of directors, clubs for the rich
and powerful, think tanks, media conglomerates, and among the high
ranks of elected legislators and politicians that it is difficult to
have an open and honest debate on the merits of their actions and
spending.
So when someone like Ted Turner says we should reduce the world’s
population by more than half, and Bill Gates suggests a 15 percent
reduction, do we fully understand the potential for eugenic
efforts? And this is another issue about Gates that should disturb
every person on the planet.
As a keynote speaker at the TED 2010 conference, Gates laid out his
rationale for an international effort towards global depopulation.
He said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that [projected to be 9
billion people by 2050] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.“ Therefore it
was shocking to learn
Bill Gates and the anti-fertility agent in African tetanus vaccinethat
a tetanus vaccine administered to Kenyan women in child bearing
years was purportedly laced with Human Chorionic Gondatropin (hCG)
that causes miscarriage and renders a woman sterile. The discovery
was made by the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association that noted
something was seriously wrong with women following vaccination and
had the vaccine analyzed. But more appalling was tracing the
vaccination campaign to funding by the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation for distribution by UNICEF. Further evidence is found in
a 2005 Foundation press release
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Joins UNICEF And BD In Effort To Prevent Newborn Deaths In Developing World stating
Gates’ gift of $26 million to UNICEF for a vaccine to eliminate
maternal and neonatal tetanus. Curiously, Brian Shilhavy at Health
Impact News
“Mass sterilization”: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine observed,
“there was no outbreak of tetanus in Kenya, on the perceived threat
of tetanus due to local flood conditions.” Therefore, why the
campaign to vaccinate young women en masse?
In conclusion, we have the world’s second richest billionaire who
deeply believes he has a personal authority to be a policy maker for
America’s public health. Therefore, do we truly realize the dangers
of billionaires, unelected to any position of authority over the
nation, and their threats that undermine democracy?
