By Scott Knowles and Mark Skidmore

Abstract

There is limited public discourse and understanding about the history and science of weather and climate intervention, though scientists have researched, tested and implemented numerous methods of weather modification for six decades. Also, climate-related geoengineering is steadily gaining support as a means of combatting rising global temperatures. With climate change and associated increasing occurrence of extreme weather events, there has not been a more providential moment to consider the implications of anthropogenic, atmospheric intervention. This paper summarizes information about weather and climate intervention with the aim of answering the question: Why aren’t more economists interested in evaluating weather and climate intervention activities?

You can read the report here.

Bibliography

Similar Posts

8 Comments

  1. Hi Catherine,

    This report is on my to-read list, but I was hoping to get your feedback on a related issue with regard to Trump pulling out of the Paris Agreement. This 12-minute vid by MIT-trained entrepreneur VA Shiva, who also ran against Elizabeth Warren for a MA senate seat in 2018 explains in simple terms that the Paris Agreement was merely a global tax to enhance the “IPCC” in his explanation and does nothing to necessarily improve environmental issues.

    Is this an accurate simplified explanation? Would you please comment on this? Thank you!

    https://shiva4senate.com/donald-trump-right-thing-pulling-paris-accords/

      1. Thanks for the update. Useful article. Besides that vid and what I mentioned before, I didn’t realize what else he was doing.

  2. Excellent summary. This needs to get around just like the Missing Money and the Chinese mind-control technology. People are going to have to understand what is upon them, whether or not it matches their desired reality. They’ll never get there if they don’t stop wishing and start working.

Comments are closed.