2015-11-subscriber-input

14 Comments

1. What are your thoughts about the book ” No One Died At Sandy Hook” ?

   Do you have any ideas about why Alex Jones withdrew his support for the book?

2. I saw “The Whistleblower” in theatre when it first came out. I recall that Rachel Weisz was on “The Today Show” promotion, and on the show it was said there was “Oscar buzz” re Weisz’s performance. After an unusually short run in theaters, it seemed to me, it was gone. I figured UN and top global officials wanted it shut down. I feel similarly re “Kill the Messenger” with Jeremy Renner. More recently the very excellent documentary about the “suicide” of Aaron Swartz, “The Internet’s Own Boy”. I highly recommend them all – and you can watch the Aaron Swartz doc in full on YouTube free. Chilling stories about real people – true heroes, two of whom were unable to survive the Fed’s malicious persecutions of them. Your tax dollars at work.

   1. Yes – all excellent. We have had all three in Let’s go to the Movies. Thanks!

3. I just listened to Catherine and Joseph re-cap the Space Conference in Austin. I was particularly delighted that Paul LaViolette was invited to speak. I have read all his books and wonder why we need the “re-engineering captured alien craft” hypothesis when our own U.S. genius, Thomas Townsend Brown (1905-1985), invented anti-gravity technology de novo before 1960. I found the dialogue between the two maestros totally delightful.

   I do not accept the prevailing hypothesis, which seems to be accepted by most Solari Report folks, that “aliens” are advanced human type civilizations living somewhere on planets in deep space, i.e., that “aliens” exist primarily in the ordinary “physical” world. I have puzzled over this UFO issue for decades (I am 75) and have gravitated to a radically different view of “aliens.” My hypothesis is that they are beings from the causal world, what Daskalos of Cyprus (the great, late Christian mystic and healer from Cyprus) called the Noetic plane (see the book, Swimming with the Whale by Daniel Joseph for a good summary of the teachings of Daskalos). Beings on the Noetic plane are formless. When they wish to visit Earth, they lower their vibrations in steps into the three worlds of existence, each with a lower level of vibration: highest being the Noetical World of pure thought, lower the Astral or Psychical world of sentiments and aspirations, and lowest the physical world we live on. They then form the energy field of their consciousness into a visible form that is recognizable to humans from their rather limited perspectives.

   I recently read two books, Encounters with Star People, and, Untold Stories of Alien Encounters in Mesoamerica, by Ardy Sixkiller Clarke, a Native American woman, who spent many years collecting UFO encounter stories exclusively from Native Americans from North America to Mexico. A typical story might involve a “space craft” landing near a Mayan pyramid at night. Out of the craft floats a ball of white light, which forms itself into a human form before it starts to walk toward the pyramid. The “alien” simple walks right through the stone structure and disappears (or out West in the U.S. might simply walk directly into the side of a mountain). After a while the being re-emerges, walks back to the craft, re-forms as a ball of light and floats up to the craft. Their “machines” are not really contraptions of metal with some type of mechanical motor; instead they are fields of consciousness that have been formed into a shape that would make sense to a human observer.

   I believe that the highest government and scientific authorities understand all of this quite well, but how can they communicate this to a spiritually backward public. Much worse, the “control freaks” who rule us are petrified with fear that those superior beings may some day challenge their right to misrule the earth as they do.

   Mark J. Bassett

   1. Mark:

      I am not sure that most SR folks assume that aliens are from planets in deep space. I think most SR reports would say “Don’t know for sure.”

      Possibilities are near infinite:

      1. Other dimensions
      2. Inner core of earth
      3. Humans on other planets
      4. Non Humans on other planets
      5. Time travelers
      6. Mind control/holograms/ops
      7. In our imagination – we are spiritual beings – all of this is in our imagination. We are dreaming up our entire material reality.

      That facts are if you don’t know, the possibilities of all the options have to be held open.

      I do believe the challenge you speak of is upon us. Spiritual forces are raising conciousness which is cleaning house.

      Catherine

4. Anonymous on November 21, 2015 · at 2:01 pm UTC
   The Saker wrote November 20, 2015:

   Frankly, I find none of the hypotheses above really convincing and that makes me nervous. The question which always haunts all analysts is “what am I missing” and, in this case, it also haunts me. I honestly cannot imagine that the Daesh leaders would sincerely believe that they can win the kind of “war against everybody” they apparently are determined to fight. I would hope that somebody with better understanding of Daesh, fluent in Arabic and well-versed in Takfiri literature would give us all the reply to this apparently simple question: what does Daesh really want?

   It’s not only a saying: If you want to know what might be the future have a look into the past!

   What is happening now in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya … is pretty much the same what happened some 100 years ago – including rise and (soon to be) fall of Daesh. Then it’s been in [Wikipedia:] Central Europe. What now is Daesh then has been the invention of Nazis (everywhere in Europe, including France, Spain and of course UK and so on, not only in Germany). And – wonder after wonder – the inventor is still the same (you all know him).

   Even the purpose of the invention – [youtube, 11minutes:] according to Stratfor’s Friedman – is exactly the same: 1. encirclement and 2. condemnation / expropriation of Russia. (There are minor differences between now and then, e.g. then Daesh has been directly financed by the inventor, now Daesh is financed indirectly. The inventor forces Qatar, Saudiarabia and in some regards even Turkey … to do so. For those of you who can’t believe it (there’s an ~150 years old american magazine The Nation, read it as a chronicle!): direct financing of Hitler started in 1923 and was done by JPMorgan (i.e by FED), which lasted until 1942. Financing of european fascist by JPM started in 1920 with Musolini in Italy. For example JPM until 1934 payed salary for more than 400000 [wikipedia:] SA-members, Germany after what you call WW1 and then burdened with reparations simply doesn’t have money to do so. Remark: In 1934 Hitler was obliged to kill most of SA leaders. Some tags for those interested: Hjalmar Schacht (historians sometimes consider him twice as important than A.Hitler), later BIS (bank for international settlements) … All in all, Daesh like before Nazis are inventions. Both remind us of another invention: Golem.)

   Thus, the determination of Daesh is the very same as the one for then Daesh, better known as Nazis.

   The real and important difference between now and then: Russia didn’t wait until Nazis enter Mother Russia and kill some millions of russians, but instead (the very last minute) started fighting nowadays Nazis outside of Russia. Hence the invention this time will fail and neither the inventor nor Russia will care about the fate of Daesh. As a consequence of the important difference above, this time there won’t be any [wikipedia:] Ratlines (to Southamerica). The rats will simply die. I’m pretty sure Russia didn’t want to reopen any Gulag camp for them – what about the syrian / iraqi dessert? Soon they would be moldered into dust. [My personal preference would be to deliver them (together with all kind of Al-Qaeda) to the purchaser (see below). What about to deliver them to Midwest or at the eastern foot of the Rockies? That’s where they belong to.]

   Sorry for any repetition: if you want to have an idea what might be the future of some … details, have a look into the history of these very same details. And please avoid any history given or written by any victor. From time to time this even includes history written by Russia! I.e., this time (Syria) Russia will be (again) the victor. Thus don’t believe russian histories about what happend October, 31th 2015 (Sinai), don’t you!

   Addendum:
   Don’t you bore me with Germany guilty (or not) of cruelties. Of course it is not. Some 100000s / millions of mainly german but also french, hungarian, italian, spanish, croatian, even malorussian (there is no such thing what some of you call Ukraine! At best it’s an invention of … exactly: Germany 1917 and 1941), baltic people have been turned into Nazis. Of course they are guilty of killing millions, but, but in the same way (sorry for that) human beings nowadays forming Daesh are guilty but not responsible, responsibility for millions of millions of dead people belongs to the inventor of any incarnation of what is nowadays called Daesh. (Consider a killer. Of course he/she is guilty! But the purchaser is not only responsible but even more guilty then the killer!) The inventor started inventing his german tool right after July, 31 1878. The very idea of the invention dates back to Oliver Cromwell (16th century) and his (sic!) invention of zionism.
   Again: Don’t you bore me with Germany is guilty of this and that … and what else. Germany as a whole and many germans (if not all of them) has been formed into a tool, into a Golem, the very same way nowadays many muslims have been turned into another tool. That doesn’t mean the tool isn’t a … killing tool, but it’s still a tool. Look at Israel. Israel is another (kind of) tool invented by the very same inventor but for another purpose. Israel is not and in no way ever has been an invention of jewish people. Never! I.e. israelis are of course guilty of killing, responsible for this killing is the inventor (of zionism). Thus speaking of AngloZionism is sheer nonsens! Zionism is an invention of AngloSaxons and not the other way round.

   Last remark (this time): Don’t you believe any successor of the current chief inventor would do any better! If you want a better world, you should avoid any kind of authority, reign of authority. You’ll need small enough entities with very strong Direct Democracy – that’s not what China, Russia, EEU, BRICS … look alike. And forget about any religion – as long as god or gods of this or that religion is/are determined to reign. Any (any!) kind of reign is the contrary of law and justice.

5. Transhumanism alert…”Dawn of Human 2.0?” Nanobots to connect us to the internet. And the article seems to like this! http://greenvirals.com/dawn-of-human-2-0-nanobot-implants-could-soon-give-us-god-like-super-intelligence/

   1. Thanks. Alert is right. Will post and circulate.

6. You were over the top sensational in Texas. Great conference! .

   1. Really glad you enjoyed it!

7. Your Space Presentation got the little braincells going
   For what it’s worth there are 16 public companies out of 35 members of the Satellite Industry Association:
   BA, CSCO, EMC, ENT, I, IRDM, KTOS, LMT, NOC, OA, PCRFY, SATS, TSYS, VSAT, and TSX: MDA, LSE: ISAT.L
   Here is the Satellite Industry Association ‘State of the Satellite Industry Report Sept. 2015’ (pdf):
   http://www.sia.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Mktg15-SSIR-2015-FINAL-Compressed.pdf

   and http://spacenews.com/.

   1. If you look at the economics, I wonder whether Snowden was financed in part by the satellite industry. 🙂

8. I must say that I find it very exhilarating to have access to a person’s mind who has within the span of four days touched the pillow of Jacob where he viewed a “ladder” in which angels freely traveling between Heaven and earth immediately followed with her own version of a “ladder” to a Planetary Space Economy inviting us earthlings to visualize our own ladder where we could freely travel between earth to the outer heavens.

   Appreciatively yours,

   Marilyn Prokup

   1. Marilyn:

      I confess to engaging in planetary portfolio strategy. 🙂

      I am very impressed you picked up on the connection!

      Catherine

Comments are closed.