Post your comments and questions for April, 2017.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

Similar Posts

101 Comments

  1. Hello Catherine:
    I just finished listening to your brilliant interview with the Saker.

    I heard you say that the average American cannot believe the extent to which some of our leaders lack human compassion or basic empathy . I would like to call your attention to a movie by Werner Herzog called Aguirre the Wrath of God. It is an excellent dramatization of a psychotic leader and his hold on those who follow him. Unfortunately history offers ample evidence of leaders like Aguirre.

    The main character Aguirre is a conquistador exploring the Amazon for gold and territory. Throughout the film Aguirre terrorizes the other characters with threats and punishments. They could easily overwhelm or restrain the mad man but instead slavishly follow his insane directions even unto death.

    I wish all Solari subscribers could see this film. Perhaps you will ask John Rappaport to consider Aguirre the Wrath of God as a recommended movie for this years list. It is a cautionary tale appropriate for our time.

    Thank you again for a great interview.

  4. Ernest:

    Do you have links to document letter bombs to the white house or these financial issues. Curious to see documents,

    Catherine

    1. Still would like documentation of letter bombs after 1947 or the money. Need links that back allegations up with documentation. Did you watch the Dutch banker video – in my experience the folks at the top are easier described as he did. Curious to see how that fits in with your theories.

      1. Mr. Miller:

        Suggest that you make your points with specific links and evidence as opposed to writing as if you are purposefully trying to create the basis of litigation. Please kill the slang – it is not welcome here.

        Thanks for the links to the Truman case. I have always been most interested in why Forestal was assassinated. One theory is that it related to his position on transparency and the black budget. Another is that it related to his position on Palestine. Indeed, I believe the two are related – and that is related to challenges faced by the Truman Administration.

        If I am correct, that might even inform us about some of the forces and third parties at work in Syria and the environs.

        Note the remarkable editorial written by Truman after Kennedy’s assassination.

        Catherine

      2. Ernst:

        If you want to play in these waters, I would recommend you learn the law:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime_laws_in_the_United_States
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frameup
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrapment
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

        Never meant to imply that you were a litigator – only that you were creating a mess that someone else could use to litigate.

        When you post here you need to add to the participants intelligence and knowledge. Can’t do that unless you are providing verifiable info. Prefer coherence to anger.

        Catherine

  5. Ernest:

    Where does the $950 billion figure come from? Suggest you watch the Ronald Bernard video in Money and Markets this week.

  6. I’m currently listening to your Saker interview.
    A great and informative discussion. Sorry you couldn’t end it on an “upbeat” note. But that’s right there with my analysis.
    Last week, I “heard” somewhere on the internet, YouTube(?), on a channel that I can’t recall, that the USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier has been in Japan since 2011. We have usually had a forward stationed AC carrier stationed in Japan as SOP.
    But this smells funky to me.
    This carrier was widely reported to have sailed directly through the worst plume of radioactivity during the Fukushima crisis in ~ March of 2011. Many sick and dying sailors stories have been denied and covered up since that time.
    There is no online activity of this AC carrier since 2011.
    There’s no record of it ever returning to the US since 2011.

    I have seen “specific” threats in virtually all of MSMedia of North Korea threatening to sink a US “aircraft carrier’ over the last week.
    Normally, a US aircraft carrier travels with an armada of protective ships including at least 1 HK submarine, guided missile cruisers and destroyers, anti-submarine and surface warfare ships, and supply ships.
    Sinking that one specific ship among a large battle group seems very unlikely.
    Of course, a “rogue” nation nuclear device possibly sink most of them?
    Check out Operation Hardtack @ 1958. It didn’t actually sink the ships very well.
    http://youtu.be/6ZyFEPqArFI

    I was born in 1958. So when I was a toddler/child I got to play in the dirt contaminated with the fallout from this and many other tests from the Nevada Test Site from 1958 to 1963.
    “So, I’ve got that goin’ for me.”
    (It’s a quote from Bill Murray in “Caddy Shack”. Talking about the Dalai Lama. My whole family, including my 83 year old Mother, uses this phrase sarcastically whenever appropriate.)
    My Dad flew 2 Gigantic nuclear bombs around in a B-52 around the north pole for many of those years. Operation Chrome Dome. We lived in Roswell, NM. He was the first 1st LT Aircraft Commander in SAC. I’m proud of him for that. And I miss him.

    But, what if the USS Ronald Reagan is so contaminated with radiation that it will be sunk as a false flag to drag the US into a war with North Korea…or Russia…or China…or Indonesia?…or the Philippines?
    Your choice…or, more likely Mr. Global’s choice?

    Similar to 9/11. Getting rid of a contaminated “turd” to further the New World Order plan? Asbestos on 9/11? Radioactivity on the USS Ronald Reagan?

    Any thoughts? MM

    1. Sounds like one theory on the sinking of the Titanic by Mr. JP Morgan ps://www.amazon.com/Titanic-Perfect-Crime-Patrea-Patrick-ebook/dp/B01E8DJ1FY

    1. Fabulous. Will post. Schauberger is a particular favorite of mine. Would love to do a Solari Report on his work.

  9. Hello Catherine,

    I’ve been thinking a lot about your red button story and turning the red button green. I think this is more pressing than people think because the red button has a timer. If the timer counts down before you press it, you lose your pension and government checks anyway but you get to keep all the crime and corruption.

    When I look at our economics, we don’t need anything new other than redistribution. We need food, shelter, power (as a need, mainly for heating), and maybe companionship but anything else is just a bonus.

    We only need 1% of of our production going to food – although if you ask just about anyone other than super wealthy, much more than 1% of our work goes to paying for food.

    We have enough shelter already. How many empty bedrooms and empty properties do we have in U.S?

    As for power I think Elon Musk (although he works for Mr. Global) gave away the game the best in his Powerwall reveal linked here:

    https://youtu.be/yKORsrlN-2k?t=3m12s

    Just a couple of the Iraq war congressional budget supplements would pay for free solar power for the entire nation. We aren’t even getting into the stolen money or the actual government budget. This money that is contained in just the add ons to the budget would give free energy to everyone without any UFO tech etc. needing to be revealed. Just do a simple calculation of the cost per watt of solar and how much the nation uses in electricity and it is a very achievable number.

    So it is there – we already have it – how do we distribute it evenly?

    There is Chinese Buddhist saying

    “What is the definition of hell?

    Everyone sitting at a banquet of the most delicious food only they have 3ft chopstick stuck permanently to their hands so if they try to feed themselves they can’t get food to their mouth.

    What is the definition of Heaven?

    The same situation but everyone feeds each other.”

    2. Jonathan:

      Keep thinking about this:

      I’ve been thinking a lot about your red button story and turning the red button green. I think this is more pressing than people think because the red button has a timer. If the timer counts down before you press it, you lose your pension and government checks anyway but you get to keep all the crime and corruption.

      Profound insight – in a liquidation sale, you are only buying time.

      1. Hello Catherine,

        I’m honored that you enjoyed the insight.

        I signed up for the Pasadena lunch and I am really looking forward to it.

        In my opinion, there really are two basic problems facing the Economy 3.0, one is that automation now taking over more and more jobs. But the other issue rarely spoken about are coming breakthroughs in Longevity. If people don’t die and they don’t have a job, it’s a big problem in the current system.

        However, it is not a problem of resources, simply one of distribution. If everything was equal, people would only need to work a couple weeks a year to support themselves. You can see why ideas of Helicopter money and taxing robots are being floated. I don’t think the people at the top they have good ideas of how it will work.It seems they are fighting over this now.

        Carbon credits I think is one of these attempts – but it is a control economy. Control how much energy people can use and you control them. In the carbon credit economy you can’t use energy without paying a carbon tax – which bypasses government and is paid directly to the corporations allowed to print the carbon credits. This control could was achieved previously just by controlling the price of oil. Just looking into the solution for global warming and seeing that it isn’t a solution at all seems to point that it may not be a real issue in the first place. Certain none of the predictions from 10 years ago have come to pass and none of the computer models track reality.

        As you’ve mentioned, GMOs seems to be another attempt. None of these plans are really workable and it seems the people at the top don’t really even know and they certainly don’t want to share their wealth – war, depopulation may seem like an easy answer to those types.

        To really imagine a 3.0 economy that is just or fair, how would it work so people only need to work 2-3 weeks a year? The idea of property as imagined now prevents that because some people will always start accumulating more than others. Then rent seeking usually follows.

        Most societies without property rights are ones where most all members are also very happy. Pygmies (if you read the book “the Forest People)”, the tribes on Vanatu and communities of monastics etc. It may be possible to set up a community of people locally – similar to what is described in “Family Wealth–Keeping It in the Family”. But, in my opinion, if you really want the popsicle index to rise in your own community you have to treat it like your family weather you have an agreement with them or not.

        1. Good points. My concern with going without property, we will end up with 2 classes. The one who owns everything and the one who can own nothing. I think that is where they want to head. I have always wanted to avoid helping them get there!

  11. Posted over in Equity Overview:

    Whenever you listen to our equity overviews or anything on risk on the Solari Report, it might help you to understand my point of view.

    I am interested in our subscribers using your time and money to serve your purpose in life – to live a free and inspired life. As part of that, I hope to help you navigate risks and see opportunities. I want to make sure you are not harvested or taken advantage of – to the best of my ability. I also want to make sure you do so in a way that helps systemically – so we all can live a free and inspired life.

    What that means is that I am integrating information from literally thousands of areas and specialities trying to discern what is important in terms of risks and opportunities to your life, your family, your health, your time, your income statement, your balance sheets.

    So my focus is on integration as the knowledge informs successful strategies. One way I do that is to try to find the very best people and sources in each of those literally thousands of areas. Once I find what is the best source and have a framework for that particular area, I am not interested in diving down to try to become an expert myself or the mediate between the different legitimate disagreements or disinformation in the area. I would rather go on and integrate a new area.

    If a discussion does not add additional value to helping my subscribers have a free and inspired life or to do so in a way that increases the chances that 7 billion worldwide can, then I am on to find the best source in another area. Given the increasing risk, there is much to do.

    Hope that helps.

  12. From a Subscriber

    >> Hi Catherine

    >> I suppose you have seen this, already. This is trending and — in my opinion — hugely important

    >> http://www.wbdaily.com/big-government/trumps-deputy-national-security-advisor-and-valerie-jarrett-are-close-friends/

    >> Huma Abedin and Ivanka Trump are friends

    >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2EGmPVP9-8

    Response from Catherine

    > Yes, have seen these.
    >
    > There is a concerted effort to provide Trump air cover by pinpointing Ivanka – or any of her friends. The new deputy nsa is someone used to put lipstick on the face of genocide but not a prinicipal in her own right. Just a conduit for those who prefer to stay invisible.
    >
    > Looks like Rice engineered her in. And I suspect Rice was in the White House on behalf of Baker, Schultz, Paulson and Kissinger etc. I am wondering if the Rockefeller faction has made a new deal with the Rothschilds now that David Rockefeller is dead. In essence it looks like the Rockefeller Republicans, the Conservative Christians and the Rothschilds/Izzies have a deal.
    >
    > Everyone else who supported Trump is dropping like flies.
    >
    > The 9/11 perps are back in sync.
    >
    > Appears that Trump is now falling into a Neocon groove. Question is why. Part of the challenge is with low approval ratings he can get nothing done except what the Necons combined with the establishment will engineer for him. Looks like the push for one world currency to me.
    >
    > Someone said the other day that WWIII started with 9-11 and will last until 2025. Beginning to feel that way. I continue to believe these guys are going to fail but it is deeply intuitive. Memories come from the future.
    >

  15. I really don’t like the fact that President Trump is playing “Nuclear Chicken” with Russia and China in North Korea. And that passports with biometric data will be required for domestic flights in 2020. Or that a cashless society is taking hold in various countries and is on our near horizon. Anyone for mandatory RFID chipping? In addition to extricating oneself from the “Tapeworm Economy” and voting for the occasional good candidate and against all other incumbents; is there anything else that can done to halt the Creeping Totalitarianism in America with it’s perpetual wars?

    1. Yes, many things. Send my Letter to My Congressman to your Congressman…more later.

  16. Catherine,

    I see your point re bitcoin — it is prototyping for Mr. Global’s digital currency control system. But looking at bitcoin as another means to diversify, a 1% holding might someday allow a new start for grandkids etc or it could just disappear.

  19. Dear Catherine,
    A few years ago you suggested that we might be moving to a food or seed based currency and that this move accounted for the strong support for GMOs. This seemed to make much sense to me. Last night, however, I watched your brilliant interview with Daniel Liszt on Dark Journalist. At time 19.20 you said, “Right now the USD is on an energy standard, if you will. I’ve always believed that the GMO thing was to move it to food but I think it has failed.”
    Can you please briefly explain why and how you think this move has failed? If you have already covered this point somewhere else, please just give me the link.
    Also, I have been looking forward to your upcoming talk with Rob Kirby about Interest Rate Swaps on the 27th April. It seems to have disappeared from the list of “Upcoming Solari Reports” on your blog page. What happened to this interview? Has it been rescheduled or dropped?
    Keep well and godspeed.
    Andrew

  20. FYI, Catherine. These women need to follow Dr. Price’s advice and make sure their daughters get adequate vitamins and minerals so that their bodies develop properly. I noted that Dr. Price found that woman on natural diets had relatively easy and pain free births compared to their westernized counterparts.

    A natural birth seeds the baby’s digestive tract with the proper bacteria. Studies have shown that babies born with a c section have bacteria similar to the bacteria present in the room and the nurses’ hands, which, of course, is much different than what they would have received from their mother’s birth canal. Needles to say, without the proper bacteria in the gut, people will have problems digesting their food, which can lead to all sorts of health problems.

    Chad

    http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-38210837

    1. Yes, I just sent this into Top Picks. Does seem odd that it would come this late. I wonder if it has anything to do with the big contract squabble between DynCorp and State.

  22. I’m confused and uncomfortable with the video “Obama Flees USA . . .”. Seems pretty meaningless, in that the bugging of everyone and their dog has been going on way before Obama. I don’t doubt that the spying escalated. In fact, I’ve seen media accusations that his was the least transparent presidency and the most punitive to whistleblowers. However, the video seemed silly to me and short on facts- but disturbing after the narrator asked what will Americans do – then ends with photo of a noose. Lynch him? Is that it? That’s a little too stereotypical to for my comfort level.

    I’m surprised the video was posted at all.

    1. I agree the quality was low.

      I posted it not because I agree with the guy who made it or the points made. The reason I posted was that I find it very significant if Obama left at the very same time that Judicial Watch was trying to serve on surveillance issues and the administration did a U turn on the middle east. If he left town, it was because someone very much wanted him far away. It is quite a switch from the gearing up to launch his foundation and plans for providing a very active policy shop. Looks to me like there may be a reasonable chance that the leadership is very worried that the infighting is in danger of going out of control. Another signal is Pompeo going after Wikileaks. My guess is that they are worried about more dumping out on pedophilia and players with that or criminal liabilities pushing things out of control.

    2. I just went into the website and changed the ridiculous title. I also found a Daily Mail piece on the Tahiti trip and posted.

      1. Thank you for your explanation- and it’s interesting about the fear of exposure re pedophilia.

        So much human trafficking is open and notorious, it seems to me, thinking in particular about the abundance of massage parlors with “happy endings” that seem to be very visible in most towns, the many nail parlors, and so-called reflexology parlors. Most of those I am referring to are staffed by immigrant women, and I am always suspicious that they were lured here with false promises, and are now basically slaves. To add insult to injury – if we know it, then law enforcement certainly knows it . . .

        Pedophilia seems to be gaining a similar reputation – that it is far more widespread than most folks would have dreamed. I recall an FBI investigation that discovered thousands of American men who visited a very few websites devoted to child porn. Because there were such an extraordinary number of men involved, the FBI was forced to confine its targeted prosecutions to only those men who worked in occupations that involved children – like pediatricians, coaches, scout leaders, teachers, etc. Stunning, isn’t it? Wonder how many men of prominence or say, elected officials – got off the hook?

        Back to Obama, I would be very surprised if he doesn’t have a designated agent that accepts service of process for him. If not, after reasonable efforts to serve are made, I would think that service via publication can suffice for civil court jurisdictions.

  24. Although I always find it difficult to listen to Kerry Cassidy, I enjoyed listening to your responses as you always provide a tweak to information you might have communicated before and that little nuance is enough to light the bulb over my head. I did send Kerry a note on her FB page essentially telling her that if she could cut out the following phrases, she would be a much better interviewer: “in other words”, “so to speak”, “you know”,” This is what I am saying”, and “I don’t know what you think”. The latter is particularly difficult because unlike interviewers like Daniel Liszt, who do incredible research into all of his interviews, she should actually have a clue about what you think because there are hours of interviews with you on the internet. What totally blew me away, and what I explained to her is a phrase NEVER to use as a response is “whatever”. When she said that, I threw up my hands. It is enough to admit being influenced by the land of fruits and nuts, but to insult the other person with a “whatever”… well, WHATEVER.

    Heh.

    1. Some do find Kerry’s interview style distracting. I like her work because she works hard to get some of the best interviews without fear for what is socially respectable. Being trained as in investment banker, I am unaffected by interview style if I am getting the tidbits I am looking for.

      1. What I find refreshing about Kerry’s interviews is that she does not shy from the unexpected but I do believe, like you, that her history suggests that she does, in fact, insist on people who represent the best of what she believes to be true. Problem for me is, that if we, as alternative media/thought, intend to create a path of substantive internet articles, then it would help if English was prime and that the constant barrage of irrelevant phrases could be eliminated. I have a hard time believing that you were not trained like me to think of correct grammar before speaking which allows you to elocute speeches that are not debatable. (Friends and colleagues agree that is one of your most incredible ability beyond your understanding of economics.) Should we intend to go forward with concepts to create the most educated reader, we must, at least, be able to speak English (whether in an interview or on paper).

        1. We have the most wonderful retired English professor proofing some of our material. I dream of the day I can have him and his colleagues review everything. Nothing like impeccable English – I love it, but it is beyond me!

          🙂

  25. I thought this was a very good 45-minute presentation on all of the scientific fraud behind HIV and its supposed connection with AIDS. Many different doctors and scientific experts are interviewed in here, and they discuss how the treatment for HIV is oftentimes the direct cause of AIDS:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0KPaOh_xwc

  26. Maria Callas sings Casta Diva ….haunting and sublime!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDax8rSE8I8

    Also …

    I wrote my Senator about my objections to 5G technology. In his short reply (see below) he seems to say …The committee gets all its technical information from professionals and they know best. I think he’s already made up his mind. Never the less I will write him back and include some youtube clips that present the dangers of this technology. Is there any particular source you think I should include in my comments?

    Happy Easter and a Glorious Resurrection is wished for all my Solari friends.
    Love is forever,
    Katie

    Here is his reply:
    Dear Ms. Madden:

    Thank you for contacting me regarding wireless services and radio-frequency exposure. I appreciate hearing your concerns.

    Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, Congress granted the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) the authority to evaluate the impact of FCC-regulated radio transmitters on the environment. As a result, the FCC has adopted radio-frequency exposure guidelines, and continues to monitor research and consult with experts on safety issues to see if those guidelines need to be revised.

    As Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, which has jurisdiction over the FCC, I will continue to monitor these issues closely. Please don’t hesitate to contact me in the future.

    Sincerely,

    Bill Nelson

    P.S. From time to time, I compile electronic news briefs highlighting key issues and hot topics of particular importance to Floridians. If you’d like to receive these e-briefs, visit http://billnelson.senate.gov/contact-bill/newsletter

    1. Catherine:

      From Jason:

      Not sure of the best approach for the congressman but here are some thoughts and papers I would draw his attention to. This just out very powerful video by industry expert Paul McGavin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRXIJgKoTpg&feature=youtu.be&t=59m03s who has a great website http://www.rfemf.com/index.html

      The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) guidelines in place today were developed in 1996. These address only the thermal (heat) impact which boils down to how much radiation it would take to heat the skin of a six-foot 220-pound military man. The limits are very high and they do not address the much lower non-thermal impacts that come with use of today’s devices. Science has since proven there are many harmful non-thermal effects. http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec01_2012_summary_for_public.pdf

      https://ehtrust.org/policy/fcc-safety-standards/

      https://ethics.harvard.edu/files/center-for-ethics/files/capturedagency_alster.pdf

      Two books I’d ask him to read would be

      http://www.goingsomewherebook.com/

      https://www.amazon.com/Overpowered-Dangers-Electromagnetic-Radiation-about/dp/1609806204

      5G specific

      https://sites.google.com/site/understandingemfs/5g-IoT

      https://ehtrust.org/cindy-lee-russell-m-d-letter-fcc-5g-review-radiofrequency-health-proceeding-13-84/

      http://scientists4wiredtech.com/2017/04/oppose-ca-sb-649/

      1. Hello Jason:
        This is exactly what I need. Thank you, I will send this to Senator Nelson and keep you posted about any sort of reactions. All the best…Katie

  27. Catherine: I am a new subscriber and would like, as much as possible and practicable, to extract myself from the “Tapeworm Economy”. Is there a checklist somewhere that can be referenced? Something akin to “Catherine’s Complete Guide to exiting the Tapeworm Economy”.;An Illustrated Manual,Complete with a Self Help Checklist.

    1. Start here:

      http://solari.com/archive/coming_clean/

      Everyone is different. Essential to sequence what you do in a manner that gives you energy. Quick ones include

      Make sure you have a good local bank or credit union http://solari.com/articles/bank_locally/find_local_banks/

      Get the entrainment technology and EMF radiation out of your body and mind – check out our Solari Reports on these topics

      Eat the highest quality fresh food and water you can access

      Make a list of everything that is causing your Popsicle Index to go down – and then see if you can cut it out

      Pay off all debt if possible

  28. Hmm … it sounds like we agree more than not.
    And the so-called woman’s card – aka “cherchez la femme” – is not so much BS as it is acknowledgement that women are wildly more clever, intelligent, guileful, and by design God’s creatures that make the world go round.
    Trust me, I’m a guy, I know.
    Through (at times painful) experience, I have learned that Genesis is likely NOT allegory … it really happened. By proof, Eve’s direct lineal descendants still rule.
    As for Trump, it’s likely he knows his semi-narcissistic(?) enamor with Ivanka was used against him, thereby neutralizing him and his doomed presidency. Still he has game and he will go down fighting.
    p.s. I hope you know I’m not trying to be argumentative, just enjoying the banter.

    1. Oh, yes, I know. I enjoy the banter.

      I still trying to see all the forces at work – some piece of intel is still missing. Will continue my sleuthing.

  29. Maybe worthwhile starting with Genesis.
    That hierarchy of handlers included the serpent tricking Eve, and then Eve luring Adam to bite the forbidden fruit, after which Adam tried to blame God (Genesis 3:12) for “putting the woman” with him.
    The Syria missile story looks deceptively analogous. The main question is whether Jared (operating under his recently heightened military profile) tricked Ivanka into expressing premature outrage at the fully unproven Sarin gas event. In any case, Eric Trump has joined the list of insiders confirming Ivanka’s role:
    http://theduran.com/confirmed-decision-to-attack-syria-influenced-by-ivanka-trump/
    The post-script of this disastrous policy gaffe is that Trump – like Adam – realized quickly that he was duped. He tried to attribute his decision to his blind affection for Ivanka, almost as ironic as Adam blaming God for giving him the woman.
    Now, Trump is trying to salvage his presidency by:
    1. declaring there will be no large Syria deployment, and that he really does want better relations with Russia
    2. we’re going to pick on a country we might be able to successfully intimidate (North Korea), and
    3. Jared is being re-designated as the architect of peace between Isreal and Palestine (vintage Trump parry against his formidable handlers).
    Unfortunately, Trump’s first major mistake in presidential power politics may have fated him and America to a painful future far away from the Great Again America he promised. A Genesis moment indeed.

    1. I don’t buy it.

      There are puppets and there are puppet masters. So who are the puppet masters doing the false flags. Even if Ivanka was an influence, these are decisions that get vetted by a lot of players. No way that influence can tolerate the vetting unless a lot of other puppet master strings being pulled throughout the process.

      There are significant puppet master manipulations involved and at work on several continents right now.

      Lots of powerful puppet masters who love to hide behind skirts like Ivanka. The woman’s card gets played 1,000 ways and it is one of the big piles of BS on the planet today.

      Follow the money and who has the $11.5 trillion.

      Also – serious question as to whether significant entrainment is involved. White House would be well advised to use hard wire cable for internet access, every person have 2 stations, one off line entirely and NO WIFI. Cell phones best left in a microwave.

  30. This question is for Catherine as I do not pretend to have the background knowledge even to hazard a competent answer. Given that the U.S. population was around 5% in 1945 and it’s share of resource use about 50%. And given that U.S. Foreign Policy was directed in part toward maintaining the resultant high living standard; largely via covert or aggressive means to obtain needed resources at extremely low prices. In your opinion Catherine if the U.S. had followed the Chinese model of barter;exchanging infrastructure for resources. With no IMF and no strings attached. If the U.S. had say expanded the Army Corp of engineers when we had a 2 million man army and sent those engineers to undeveloped countries and bartered infrastructure for natural resources without further strings attached. Would the United States be able to maintain the same high level standard of living for so long that it has enjoyed since World War 2 by less scrupulous and unsavory methods?

    1. Laurence:

      I would estimate yes. We would have still needed to have a pretty significant navy/military presence but that could have been financed by reserve currency statust. However, we would not have been able to siphon off the extraordinary amounts for blackbudget/hidden system of finance and the leadership would have been determined by meritocracy as opposed to inside information and assasination.

      So what we got from the existing model is the privilege of being ruled by the men who killed Kennedy and the transfer of global wealth to a SSP and Breakaway civilization and what ever else is behind the veil.

      1. Indeed! I do not have your financial background but was wondering if all the lies,theft and murderous wars were necessary for the Impala and the split level in the suburbs. Or as John Houseman used to say in the Smith Barney ads we could have done it the old fashioned way. We could have earned it.

        1. Yes, we could have earned it. That was not the point. The point was for the top guys to come out on top and to get a great deal of secret private resources. Question is why?

          1. So we are describing the dynamics of human power politics at the highest level;not different from Stalin’s Politburo or the Curia in ancient Rome?

  32. As part of trying to understand how the ad hoc decision to bomb Syria came down, we find some indication of Ivanka:
    http://nypost.com/2017/04/08/ivanka-may-have-convinced-her-dad-to-bomb-syria/
    Good Lord … if Zio-Jared can so easily hijack his wife’s natural, but uninformed empathy and re-direct it to tragically misguide her dad … and DJT actually converts her distress into an instantaneous, unconstitutional military strike … we have embedded entrainment manipulation far beyond anything I had feared.

    1. Chad:

      Having watched it work up close, I am against it period. Government should be about justice, not profit.

      Catherine

      1. Well, I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. I know it can be abused and is abused and it is distressing to me that you went through what you did. The trouble is how just is it to allow a real criminal to keep all of his/her ill gotten gains? If a cabal or cartel stole billions from the government via the DOD or DOH and killed people to get it, should we allow them to keep the money? It is especially important when the statutory fines are not that high. The criminal can pay the fine like the cost of doing business and keep his booty. Perhaps we need to change it from civil asset forfeiture to criminal asset forfeiture. along with other changes. Maybe asset forfeiture is not that viable right now, due to the state of our government, but, again, in theory, I don’t have an issue with it.

        Policing for profit is a problem and it extends past asset forfeiture. Many small towns view traffic tickets as a source of revenue and officers are pressured to keep the tickets going. The Feds give grants to agencies to run seat belt and DWI checks, so that is what the agencies focus on. It would be nice to see the Feds give agencies grants to investigate real crime like burglary.

        Here in NY, we have “surcharges” on top of the fine, which can be larger than the fine. It’s outrageous. I could go on, but you get the point

        1. Problem is Chad that it is the US government that is doing the stealing. Steaing $11.5 trillion, running the narcotics trafficking and the mortgage fraud. When you give them asset forefeiture powers then that is the same as giving governmental authority to target people to the people who run organized crime.

          Never going to work.

  34. Mr. Denninger has a good framework there. 2 weak points are: his assumption of Rule of Law and his punitive outlook regarding those with diseases of lifestyle (Big 3 cancer, diabetes, heart disease really); just because he figured out his diet and lifestyle was killing him and made changes, he assumes anyone who doesn’t figure it out, can’t or won’t do anything about it deserves what they get.

    1. The most dangerous lifestyle is anger. Mr. Denninger has more opportunity to protect his health, I think.

      1. Catherine,
        It is important to have ideas, plans, even solutions ready should the opportunity for healthcare (or any change) present itself. However, since chances of getting democratic top down change via our Federal government is just about nil as long as the lobbying, big money and Deep State exists, as you often demonstrate it is best to act locally and start with ourselves.

        On the topic of food and health I can point to four excellent resources:

        Dr. Michael Greger, NutritionFacts.org. Try: https://nutritionfacts.org/video/how-not-to-die/
        !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        The Truth about Cancer: What You Need to Know about Cancer’s History, Treatment, and Prevention by Ty M Bollinger https://www.amazon.com/Truth-about-Cancer-Treatment-Prevention/dp/1401952232/ Eye opening.

        John and Ocean Robbins https://foodrevolution.org/about-us/ Excellent

        The Blue Zones Solution and The Blue Zones -9 Lessons for Living Longer from the People Who’ve Lived the Longest https://www.amazon.com/Blue-Zones-Solution-Eating-Healthiest/dp/1426211929
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBCdIauR6nU
        https://www.bluezones.com/ A great start.

  37. All wheat is not created equal. As with any food seed variety, quality of soil inputs, fertility, production processes, intention, logistics/supply chain make a difference. To find authentic food that has not been adulterated at all along the way is difficult – whether wheat or steak. So you never really know if you cannot tolerate a food item unless you can first get your body clean and then test with a really clean, heirloom sample.

    2. How do you get any clean earth grown food with the relentless chemtrails being cast across our skies on a daily basis?

      1. Filtered green house is the best or grow in a place where little to no chemtrails – not ideal.

        1. There is a lot of movement now in Controlled Environment Agriculture (i.e. vertical farming – although there is much more than vertical farming). See here:

          http://aerofarms.com/2015/12/15/aerofarms-completes-20-million-investment-to-meet-the-increasing-demand-for-locally-grown-produce/

          Here:
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OumTNTmvPrY

          and here:
          http://urbanagnews.com/blog/greener-roots-farm-first-vertical-farm-nashville-tn/

          Most of this stuff is not labeled organic because the organic hydroponic feed has not been perfected yet and causes issues in the piping etc. But this is a big aea for venture capital right now. Don’t know if the recent investment is because of push to space or something else.

          1. Comment from Harry:

            Personally, my preference by far is to take an organic or biodynamic soils based approach – which can still be done indoors. I visited the first successful indoor, soil based, organic tomato grower in Holland many years ago – and every year his production was sold out and despite several major expansions could never fulfill demand. There is not substitute for soil still – taste, nutrition, pedigree and a story to tell. All these guys want to go high tech. There is nothing more high tech than nature’s soil.

  39. FYI, Catherine. Dr. Douillard makes an interesting case for eating wheat in his new book, Eat Wheat, as long as it is high quality, properly processed and prepared wheat. I’ve been gluten free for awhile, so this is a welcome development. I’m looking into it further. Here is an interesting interview with a farmer and former professor with Douillard and an interview of him by Dr. Mercola. Be well.

    Chad

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF6HtPMeO5A

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O7556HHURg

    1. Makes sense – I get a very different response to Ezekial bread then US bread vs. European bread. However, i think it is not so easy to find high quality wheat properly processed in US.

      1. IMO mixed. Some very good ideas. Some not so good ideas. Some frighteningly dangerous ideas. He is promoting a Constitutional Convention which is a signal to me that he is playing for the the Rothschild team -however whether he is or not or just has superbly poor judgement is impossible to say.

        1. I have to admit, I thought the purpose of a constitutional convention was to bring our wayward government and its errant policies back to the upholding of and acting in accordance with constitutional laws.

          I tried to research why Mr. Steele wants a constitutional convention, as I had accepted it as a good idea based on my erroneous definition, but I can’t find an explanation. Can you please explain why he wants one and why it is such a frightening dangerous idea?

          1. If you understand the Red Button problem, it underscores why changing the president was not going to change much – so I am surprised he thought it would. Or that change would be anything other than a four year trench warfare which has just begun. Last time in the world to give up.

            We have to shift the time and money – without that changing the president is limited in impact. And the president can only do what there is an 80% or higher consensus for in the country. So you have to build that consensus.

            Question is why Trump has done some many 180s since 4/1 so fast. Next clue will be the budget – that is where reality of policy becomes real and irrefutable. Will be issued in May.

            The pdf for the 1st Quarter Wrap Up will be available next week – recommend you read as background.

    3. I went to Dr. Douillard for two consultations when I worked in Boulder. His 3 Season Diet book is very useful. I avoid modern wheat because it is difficult to digest but not the ancient grains

  40. I live in CA. I just met with senior staff to my Republican State Assemblywoman. I adapted your letter to your Congresswoman and directed it to her with a print copy of the Wikipedia page re Participatory Budgeting. I was pleased to see her level of interest. She advised that the first-time assemblywoman was particularly dedicated to transparency. The staff member seemed to appreciate your citation of specific types of information that would prove useful.
    I was pleased to hear of the assembly woman’s opposition to a couple of expensive projects unlikely to yield a positive ROI. We had a lengthy and useful conversation about our looming debt. I am looking forward to your webinar so that I can expand upon this dialogue. I also asked if there were movements in CA to call for a constitutional convention. She was unaware of any. I outlined the issue with reference to the likely hidden agenda of likely proponents (vis-a-vie missing money) and gave her a transcript of your interview with Edwin Vieira.
    Thank you Catherine for providing the tools for me to engage locally.

Comments are closed.