Post your comments and questions for March, 2017.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

Similar Posts

87 Comments

  2. In my latest endeavor to lead a free and inspired life, I succeed yesterday in disabling a news app on my cell phone that appeared when I did a fresh OS install a few months ago. This damn app called News Republic kept popping up all day long with a variety of useless Hollywood and social trivia developments and vicious anti-Trump news. It got to be a game with me to see if I could ever read a single article that was even remotely neutral on Trump, even when sometimes the headline looked promising, and there was never a single one. Although this app helped me to understand how the Left and Deep State are attempting to trash Trump’s reputation and brainwash the broader public against him, I just couldn’t take it anymore. But, since this app was somehow a “system component” of the Android operating system (huh???), it couldn’t be deleted, either. I felt trapped. But, I finally found a way to disable it and haven’t had a Hollywood or Trump article in about 18 hours. Oh my gosh, I feel as if I’ve been freed from a prison! (But, without this app, how will I know in the future that three girls got tossed off a United flight because they were wearing leggings???)

    1. I used to have a colleague who would say at moments like this:

      THEY KNOW HOW TO DO YOU!

      I repeat – digital systems have zero integrity.

      1. Wrote this in DFW. An hour later a News app appeared on my phone while I keep trying to turn off the irritating i cloud notification.

        1. Rather than subjecting ourselves to i-clouds or whatever, maybe we should nurture, be inspired, and surround ourselves with the prototype described in Hebrews 12:1.

          2. Hebrews 12:1 Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us,

            AMEN TO THAT!!!!!!!!!

  3. With you just having posted about the Pistis Sophia on the Home Page, I recently read the following two books and wondered if you had read them. The author makes compelling, well-documented cases in both books, and the Pistis Sophia is mentioned more than once in the first one:

    https://www.amazon.com/Reincarnation-Christianity-Elizabeth-Clare-Prophet/dp/0922729271/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1490748712&sr=1-1&keywords=elizabeth+clare+prophet+reincarnation+christianity

    https://www.amazon.com/Lost-Years-Jesus-Documentary-Evidence/dp/091676687X/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1490748615&sr=1-2&keywords=elizabeth+clare+prophet+books

    1. Have not read them. While I was studying the Bible, I read some of the materials that were edited out, then the Essences and tried reading some of the book that try to unpack historical fact. I concluded that it was unknowable and I should focus on growing spiritually. One of the most interested sources I have found to inform Christ is Steiner. Can’t tell you why. It just always resonates. Here is a favorite: http://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/19220827p01.html

  4. I just finished reading the book “JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why it Matters,” and it’s an amazing book! The author goes into great detail on many things I didn’t know about both JFK and his assassination, even though I had previously studied a ton of information on this.

    I didn’t know, for example, that JFK and Khrushchev were secretly negotiating the end of the Cold War, but that the Joint Chiefs wanted war so much that they were attacking Soviet ships and invading Cuba on their own…all against JFK’s instructions.

    Things had gotten so bad for JFK in the end that the only person he could trust to deliver his communications to Khrushchev was a Soviet KGB agent, as U.S. State Department officials could no longer be trusted to deliver these communications for him.

    In addition, the Joint Chiefs were pressing JFK to allow them to launch a nuclear first strike on the Soviet Union, estimating that 140 million Soviet people would be killed, and that 30-40 million Americans would be killed in the Soviet counter strike. The military believed that these were acceptable levels of loss in moving forward with launching the first strike.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B005Q07DKY/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

      1. Agreed, Catherine. The part that I didn’t really know about were the detailed, secret negotiations that were going on between Kennedy and Khrushchev to end the Cold War. The Cuban Missile Crisis had them both realize how close they could have come to destroying the world, and they realized that they had to do something bold to make sure that this didn’t occur in the future.

        1. Yes, it would have been remarkable if the two had continued to grow their relationship and implement a new vision.

      1. It was interesting to read in even more detail this time how there was a plot to kill JFK just 2-3 weeks earlier in Chicago. The authorities walked into a home in Chicago where there were high-powered rifles with scopes, along with a map of the Presidential parade route. In addition, there was an ex-marine names Thomas Vallee who was cranky and outspoken, who carried guns and ammunition in his car, and who had just been given a job in a building along the parade route…an apparent Oswald-like patsy in waiting. But of course, we never heard from the media about that plot, even though JFK had canceled his trip to Chicago at the last minute because of it.

        Also, in the theater in Dallas where Oswald was arrested, there was an Oswald lookalike who was also arrested in there and taken out through a separate entrance, all while Jack Ruby was in the theater watching everything.

  5. “With a critical mass of players, our creations grow in power.”

    You have heard of the Pareto Principle, but the numbers required may be even less: “To affect the entire world, Orme-Johnson says, groups of 7,000 persons would have to meditate, 7,000 being the square root of 1% of the world’s population.

    “We have the knowledge now to stop terrorism and international conflicts and to create an era of peace, creative and international harmony never before seen in history. All we need is groups of 7,000 . . . to do it. . . .””
    http://articles.latimes.com/1986-05-08/news/vw-4487_1_square-root

    1. Washington Post has done more than most to keep illegal drugs illegal and keep the profit margins high.

  7. Catherine,

    “Of course machines can’t think as people do. A machine is different from a person. Hence they think differently.” — The Imitation Game (2014)

    When Mr. Armstrong insists the trend can only be impeded never altered, I judge he is dogmatic and willfully ignorant of actions of our shadow government, not so much deceitful. It seems Martin Armstrong succeeded in resurrecting his computer program and business, after being crushed by deep state elements, to create the circumstances where expert program and business will survive him. Obviously a different experience of the Powers That Be which did managed to seize your software.

    Yes a general distrust of “blackbox” systems, as they are often part of con jobs, is healthy and justified. Yet opaqueness can also be part of the problem of computer neural nets, machine learning/self-programing vs. human computer coding in general: humans would never do it that way. Even if Armstrong’s proprietary code was made open source few would be able to judge its veracity; certainly not me.

    1. Agreed. All these systems may be useful – webbots mapping, neural networks, etc. However, they all translate into inducing people into believing they are passive players trying to be smart about a predicted future as opposed to players involved in dynamically creating the future.

      I am a player, not a predictor. I chose to help other people become players too. With a critical mass of players, our creations grow in power.

    1. Yes. Sent into the blog team for posting earlier this week. Someone suggested we should respond by making sure all the data of the people voting yes for this should be outed on them. I said, starting with their anthony weiner laptop mentions.

  9. Hi Catherine:
    I want to follow up with you on some ideas you shared in the Local Action Webinar. I am all about #2 Human and Intellectual capital investment. During the broadcast I sent an outline -progress report – of the initiative underway here in Central Florida. We’ve completed the pilot program and it was a big success. The city has agreed to accept more students next semester.

    I want to move onto the next activity but I need some clarification. Here’s what I am thinking: I volunteer with a local organic farm. The owners might be open to taking on an apprentice.

    I know an elderly man (over 80) who would like to sell his grapefruit/orange/lemon tree orchard. He will only sell to someone who will promise never to use pesticides on his trees.

    Our mayor is a fellow who knows all the deep pockets in the city. I guess I should talk to him about some kind of start up funding/ financial arrangements for the successful apprentice.

    Do I have the general concept right? I will wait for your green light before proceeding.
    All the best,
    Katie (aka Catherine in Florida).

    1. Katie:

      There are two issues. Who will manage and operate the farm and who will own and fund it. Take a look at the DVD, The Real Dirt on Farmer John – it shows an example of a group of people who get together and buy the land to leave to the farmer. Can’t hurt to talk to the mayor to see if there were any local investors or angel networks that would be interested in funding on such a basis – or funding a farmer who was committed to caring for them.

      If he sells to the local restaurants, there may also be a connection to investors through them.

      Good luck!

      Catherine

      1. Hello Catherine:
        Thank you for these additional insights. I figure it will take me anywhere from 6 months to a year to investigate all the resources and develop a workable plan (or not).
        What I really wanted to know from you is am I moving in the right direction. Is this the kind of effort (with your suggested modifications) you had in mind?
        My brother was assistant city manager for Cincinnati. He and I’ve spent many delightful hours talking about this effort as well as the student/city exchange we launched this month.
        If nothing comes from these activities at least I feel a lot closer to my younger brother. That’s a very good thing.
        All good things are wished for you,
        Katie

        1. Katie:

          Sounds to me like you are headed in the right direction. When it comes down to helping the young people thrive on Main Street I believe it comes down to who wants to play – schools, community colleges, Chamber, Rotary, angel networks, small businesses, banks…it is a matter of network and finding a first few steps that will be energizing in a practical way for all concerned.

  10. Catherine,
    You posted a good article on the geospatial aspects of gun violence. I think it helps people to visualize what law enforcement has known for years. However, I think the article should have pointed out with what activities was that gun violence associated. Was a person shot due to a drug turf war, revenge, robbery gone bad, crime of passion, etc.?

    I think that the article should have also differentiated between the causes of crime, in general, and gun related homicides. They are similar, but there are differences (e.g. not every robbery ends up with someone being shot). People often conflate the act with the tool used to commit the act. As a slight aside, I feel that giving people extra punishment for the tool that they used in a crime (or if they did something out of “hate”) is not productive or efficacious or even just. The act and the results of that act are what matters.

    In researching gun violence, I came across this article that you may find interesting. I thought the author made some very good observations about comparisons between the US and other countries’ gun violence. Be well.

    Chad

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-10-16/mistake-only-comparing-us-murder-rates-developed-countries

  12. Yup, with the press conference with Nunes today and now this, the obvious is finally beginning to be documented. IMO, tip of the iceberg.

  16. Steve included Solari in his list, but I could not find an original list on Harvard site. If you see a list on Harvard’s site, let me know. One article points to a list at google docs that seems a bit informal – but again it is not on Harvard site. So still looks like fake news to me!
    If you see an actual list that the Harvard Library has made and verified, please do post it!

    1. Apparently Harvard changed how it was referring to this list within its own guide on fake news later on after it first linked to the list.

      This is an excerpt from an article about this from an organization that’s located within Harvard:

      “When Harvard first published its research guide, it described Zimdars’ list as a ‘huge list of fake news sites.’ That’s been updated to ‘An informal list compiled by students for a class taught by Melissa Zimdars at Merrimack College.’”

      So apparently, as you’ve mentioned, Harvard linked to the list instead of including the names of the sites within its guide.

      Here’s the link to this article that I’ve just mentioned:

      http://www.niemanlab.org/2017/03/harvard-library-gets-slammed-for-its-earnest-fake-news-guide-updates-from-the-fake-news-world/

    1. Jim:

      From what I can tell, Harvard did not make up a list.

      In Steve Lendman’s article he has a list of sources he describes as reliable that he says in on Harvard’s list – however I can find no such list. The Harvard site has a section on “Fake News” – they link to the associate professor from Merrimack College who did make a list. However, that link takes you to a french text – so it is not working.

      A search for that list on the Internet produces this list https://docs.google.com/document/d/10eA5-mCZLSS4MQY5QGb5ewC3VAL6pLkT53V_81ZyitM/preview

      We were not on the associate professors original list. We are on this list and our type is categorized as “unknown” which is defined as:

      Unknown (tag unidentified): Sources that have not yet been analyzed (many of these were suggested by readers/users or are found on other lists and resources). Help us expand our resource by providing us information!

      So this gets back to “Fake News” – it looks to me like Harvard or the Harvard Library did not create a list of “fake news” websites and it is highly misleading to attach Harvards name to it – that is a very fake news thing to do.

      While I don’t know the associate professor at Merrimack. She is an associate professor of communications and media.

      http://www.merrimack.edu/live/profiles/586-melissa-mish-zimdars
      http://www.merrimack.edu/index.php

      Here is the project she works on:
      http://www.opensources.co

      Trolling that, Solari.com does not appear on either Credible or NotCredible lists.

      If you look at the associate professor’s bio, I think the chance that she or her associates are expert in the covert economy or financial system is small, so I am not sure why we are even thinking or discussing her lists.

      If you look at the Credible List it is media that has significant sovereign backing and/or financial resources. So it would appear that rich resources are what get you to credibility in their space. Lord knows resources do help produce a better publication.

      This means they are not focused on material omissions. Probably more focused on slip ups like Lendman implying that an official Harvard source made a list.

      What will decide all of this is views and subscriptions. Who gets the views and who gets the subscriptions.

      Which is why I give priority to NO MATERIAL OMISSIONS and why the good associate professor unknowingly supports so many media sources with investors who start wars and practice pedophilia and make far less typos than me.

    1. The current looks up to date and the latest is in the Library. Which one is not there? Make sure you have cleared your browser cache has this is often my problem.

      Specifics welcome!

      Catherine

      1. Thanks, Catherine. My cache has always updated automatically whenever checking Resources, but it wasn’t updating this time. So once I cleared the cache everything was fine. 🙂

  20. FYI, Catherine. Jess doesn’t deserve a medal…maybe handcuffs though. Because of his apparently corrupt actions, the taxpayers may be on the hook for damages for these cancer patients, because the EPA does not have clean hands. The patients should sue this guy personally. I’d like to see the US Atty investigate this guy and his supervisor.

    Chad

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-14/court-docs-prove-monsanto-collusion-epa-kill-cancer-study-admits-cant-say-roundup-do

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-27/monsanto-cancer-suits-turn-to-alleged-whitewash-by-epa-official

  21. Catherine…I’m assuming that the May 6th lunch event in Pasadena now replaces the April 20th event that you were planning on having in Southern California? Is this correct?

    1. The speech is scheduled for May 11 and the lunch for May 6th. I am still waiting for the confirmation on the speech to notify you.

      1. OK, Catherine. Thanks. The venue for the lunch on May 6th is nice. I used to play golf there when I lived in L.A., and it’s set in the foothills of Pasadena, with no other commercial businesses nearby. The Rose Bowl is next door, but it’s likely that there will be no events scheduled there on that day.

  22. Thanks to CAF and the Solari.com website, a friend from the Panhandle of Texas contacted me to let me know that her brother had been involved in fighting the fires that killed several firefighters and ranchers attempting to save their livestock. As a result, I contacted a neighbor rancher here in Central Texas who sells hay and he is donating round bale hay for cattle to Panhandle ranchers directly in need. We have had a remarkably wet spring but faced fires across our county in 2011 so we know too well what this means to a business that is always susceptible to ranging market and environmental forces. Fire is always the worst of these. It not only takes your livelihood but can take your life as well.

    I write this only to say that the Solari principle of making America great again through each individual, each community, is alive and well here in Texas. Salude. Meanwhile, anyone interested in making a donation to an organization dedicated to this ranching community can do so to: Working Ranch Cowboys, Texas Farm Bureau, Texas Agricultural Extension, and other charitable organizations assisting those who have lost everything.

    1. BTW, great interview (as usual) on American Watchdog. Our Panhandle friend and I marveled at how we often think we have a handle on “the situation” and then listen to you in an interview and we find ourselves saying, “oh wow, that too”, then realize the interviewer has the same response. BTW, she led me to Clif High and that clearly means one more tangent that has me scratching my head. Trying to determine which 50% could come true… One thing I have learned in these nearly 67 years is that being on the wrong side of guessing the future can be very ugly.

      J

      1. On his current shows, I would guess that the chances of most of Clif’s predictions coming true are less than 1%. Good for stretching your mind. Not good for time or investment allocations.

    2. Jane:

      We will donate and post on the website as our latest donation and say prayers as well.

      Catherine

  23. Oops, my computer went haywire.
    Putin has:
    Banned GMOs
    Made an incredible statement for state sovereignty (Syria)
    Condemned endless vaccines
    Built an impenetrable military
    Gone a long way toward fixing central bank controlled money
    Kicked Soros out of the country
    Re-embraced Orthodox Christianity
    etc. etc.
    We can question his motives all we want. But the facts speak for themselves.
    I think Trump sees this, and wants to adopt that model. That’s why they are both under perpetual siege, and why they continue to bond ever closer.

    1. I spoke with a Russian insider here in Canada who I have known for many years. He says that Putin was headed into a serious internal attack if Clinton had won – the Atlantacists would have reigned supreme.

  24. Again, all fabulously interesting, thanks.
    Per Trump, I suspect he sees his “role” not as a handled chessboard piece, rather something like the master of asymmetric improvisation. That’s the only way he can survive the endless traps set by the Deep State. His “loyal soldiers” can’t help him if he only looks to them; they clearly seek his firebrand leadership, not his consensual yearning.
    His goal seems to be to seize, then control the narrative away from the mind-kontrol masters. Twitter obviously a big arrow in his quiver to deliver direct-connect toward this end. But, to be effective, he has to tune in to the public mindset (i.e., tap his empathy strong suit), and deliver what they feel in their hearts before they are cognitively aware of it.
    Per your question about turning the Red Button Green, I think Trump has no choice but to do it. Again, it may sound crazy, but I he is really just following Putin’s lead. Look what Putin has done:

  25. So, this is really interesting.
    Based on your notes above, it sounds like you place a 0% probability of Trump offering whistle-blower protection under existing law … despite the fact that Trump is clearly the biggest beneficiary of the anonymous Vault 7 whistle-blower download (shielded by Wikileaks, to which Solari just donated $100 in support).
    It’s almost like you are acknowledging that resistance is futile; nonetheless, Solari chooses to be a patron saint of lost causes.
    I would have never expected that answer, which makes me so glad I asked the question.
    For sport, I will take the other side of that bet. I place a >0% probability on Trump giving some (in)direct signal that he will protect whistle-blowers, as per existing law.
    As for the Red Button, we no longer need to wonder who will push it. Putin already did. That’s why he is Public Enemy #1:
    http://russia-insider.com/en/putin-calmly-explains-why-liberals-hate-russia-video/ri19147?utm_source=Russia+Insider+Daily+Headlines&utm_campaign=d414e7a6aa-Russia_Insider_Daily_Headlines11_21_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c626db089c-d414e7a6aa-227205773&ct=t(Russia_Insider_Daily_Headlines11_21_2014)&mc_cid=d414e7a6aa&mc_eid=d4f9da5a20
    Trump is merely following Putin’s lead. I agree with you that Trump is an empath; in that regard, he clearly relates to Putin – as do an ever-expanding list of world leaders – and he will continue to engage him.
    Getting back to the whistle-blower question, Putin singularly gave asylum to Snowden (a CIA whistle-blower), and he said he did it for most of the same reasons that our own whistle-blower protection laws exist.
    In summary, my bet is that there is a greater than 0% chance of Trump surprising us in a positive way. He may well take Putin’s lead.
    Against all conventional wisdom, whistle-blowers – like you – may finally be recognized and revered for the heroes they are.

    1. I think you misunderstand.

      Trump is playing a role on the chessboard. He has to optimize his position. Protecting Snowden or Assange openly would have a devastating impact on my loyal soldiers he is depending on.

      However, given the timing of his comments on Sweden or his being taped, it appears he may be front running the actions of his own syndicate.

      Meantime, if you are going to turn the red button green – a condition precedent to hitting the red button you have to do those things. It would be unlikely for a President to cold turkey

      Would you?

      You should read the details of my case at http://dunwalke.com/gideon – I was NOT a whistleblower. I was the TARGET of a whistleblower. Whistleblowers are often used to destroy the people who are most competent and honest.

      IMO, Putin protected Snowden because the factions in the west supporting Putin arranged for him to do it .Things are much murkier than they seem.

      Just like the Russians tried to trick me out of my settlement – my guess because they were the #2 Fannie Mae holders.

  26. I thought the Whistleblower Protection Act is a law to supposedly protect whistle-blowers
    (https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/whistleblower) …
    not leakers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_leak).
    Apparently, I’m missing some nuance, and there’s a (blurred?) line between “leaking” and “whistle-blowing”.
    Anyway, per your Binney/Wiebe nod, maybe Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer would to be a good helper also. For example, this Binney/Shaffer clip is breath-taking:
    http://theduran.com/explosive-nsa-whistleblower-and-us-lieutenant-colonel-tell-fox-news-cia-hacked-dnc-with-russias-fingerprints/

    1. Jim:

      The entire economic model of the US government is to run organized crime globally. How is the President supposed to operate if there is no line management authority?

      Most of what the government does is unconstitutional and illegal. They have refused to produce audited financial statements are required by law for two decades. THERE WERE $6.5 TRILLION OF UNDOCUMENTABLE ADJUSTMENTS last year at DOD>

      Watch the Bed Button story.

      You are missing something. I think it is so big and so in your face that you are having difficulty getting your perspective.

  27. Catherine –
    I noticed you described Trump – to the amazement of Richard Dolan – as “an empath”.
    Also, Solari recently donated $100 to support Wikileaks, the clearing house and distribution network for whistle blowers.
    As an alpha grade whistle-blower who has withstood horrific abuse from the sociopath Ruling Class, do you think there’s any prospect that our new Empath-in-Chief might tweet some expression of support for whistle-blowers?
    Or maybe that he simply directs the government to abide by the intent and enforce the Whistle Blower Protection Act (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_Protection_Act )?
    After all, no one stands to to be vindicated more by the release of Vault7 than our besieged President. As an empath, he has to feel that.
    I know that Trump has spoken harshly of Snowden (and maybe others). But he has unwittingly been cast in the role of quasi whistle-blower, himself. So, just curious how you see this drama proceeding , given your experience and your comments.
    Thanks.

    1. Jim:

      As President, Trump must support the law, so he must be anti-leaking. He needs to support the good soldiers in place doing their job. I don’t see any way around it. That said, he must grapple with the issue of how we bring integrity to our digital systems.

      If I were him, I would hire William Binney and Kirk Wiebe to help him do that.

      Catherine

  31. Hello Catherine,
    I’m attending an investment conference next week and one of the speakers is Egon von Greyerz of Matterhorn Asset Mgt in Zurich. The name sounds familiar and I wondered did you have a Solari report with him? I tried to locate it on the website but no luck. Maybe it was another person from the same firm.

    1. Egon has not done a Solari Report. I have done an interview on their series which may have inspired the connection.

  32. Dear Catherine –
    What a wild and fun Dolan discussion, thanks!
    Your conviction about the surreptitious reasons for a Constitutional re-write is simply breath-taking in its implications.
    To me, when you say “the debt growth model is over”, it’s largely because America (as well as most of the world) has been totally sacked … ironically via the diabolical global issuance Federal Reserve debt-based US$ so-called “money”, the only visible ledger record of which is a mega trillion $$-denominated liability. All stolen items are hidden away from their rightful owners.
    Not surprisingly, the sociopath crooks are quite sure they robbed the world blind “fair-and-square”, as any accomplished thief would claim. In fact so much so, that they want to do it all over again. Ergo, Constitutional convention (CC) to eliminate the possibility of justice under Constitutional law being rendered. Then, onto the next mega-trillion $$ heist.
    I have two questions about all this:
    1. Does the proposed CC possibly relate to what you have termed the “Rape of Russia II”, in other words to globalists doing to America much like what they did to Russia in the 20th century?
    If so, and the means by which globalists intend to execute the Rape of America is first by clearing the ledger of their precedent larceny via a CC, then should we consider calling this CC plan the “Rape of America II” (i.e., instead of RoR II)? It seems we need to highlight that a monstrous crime has already been committed against America. Not only do the monsters intend to perfect the cover-up via CC, they had so much fun they want to do it all over again.
    Yikes, it’s hair-raising to think that’s what the move for a CC is all about.
    2. During the discussion, Dolan asked you about the possibility of debt repudiation or jubilee on some basis. Basically an open-ended question that might deserve more play.
    In that regard, since globalists want to perfect their crimes by eliminating our Constitutional recourse against their theft (whereby via CC we unwittingly oviate their guilt under the law), might our appropriate, corresponding thrust be to declare the accumulated debt under Rape of America I to be null and void? That is, they can’t steal all our assets with debt-based bankster $$ and then leave us with all the debt.
    Certainly, we could declare all this debt as “odious” ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odious_debt ), especially since the gangsters themselves are flagging their own crimes by trying to stealthily separate the debt from all the hidden assets they stole.
    In summary, I liked Dolan’s debt jubilee question. No telling where your further discussing it might lead.
    Thanks again!

    1. Certainly we have a case the debt was fraudulently induced.

      Yes, a Con-Con is part and parcel of a Rape of America II. When you bring down all the legal and financial controls with a balance sheet full of land and real estate and other assets ripe for the plucking, the Piggies will be out in full force.

  33. FYI, Catherine.

    Chad

    http://www.tedmalloch.com/my-life-behind-the-elite-curtain-as-a-global-sherpa/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCbR3MQa8Ms

    I like some of his ideas in the video, but I question his use of Cargill as an example of virtue. They have been caught price fixing on a number of occasions among other issues. Maybe he means that when Cargill gives their word that they will honor the price fixing agreement, they will do it, lol.

    Here is an interesting site that I found while researching Cargill.

    http://www.greenamerica.org/programs/responsibleshopper/company.cfm?id=200

    1. I have Malloch’s book but have not read yet. Like the other 100 or so in the stack!

      My one personal experience with Cargill was one of their officers was quoted to try to frame me. The officer told my attorney that he never said any such thing. My guess? They were in on the frame. When it failed. They pulled the rug out from their co-conspirator. No honor among thieves.

        1. Wouldn’t work. No one would believe the truth and I am not up for modified hangouts.

          1. Maybe, maybe not. For one, it depends on what genre it was, what aspects of your life were explored, and what the goal of the film was. Two, some people would believe it and would learn from it (your subscribers most likely would). Three, initially, the majority would not, but many would eventually believe it over time. Look at what happened with people’s beliefs surrounding the JFK assassination and 9/11. As you pointed out, you were a real enemy of the state and the fictional version did pretty well at the movies. Again, with the right cast, director, and producer (probably from another country), I think it would be a winner. The main problem would be is that certain forces would try to keep it from being made or released.

            I understand your reservations about a modified/limited hangout, but I would hate to see the perfect become the enemy of the good. It could be the beginning of a more in-depth discussion. In other words, it would be the beginning of talking about your life to a wider audience, not the end.

          2. Understood. A movie must first and foremost be great art – and entertainment. It should convey some valuable insight and inspiration. So sticking to the non-fiction story is not possible, although ideally to the gist of it. Then it does not tell my story. It just uses my story to tell a story.

          3. Maybe if the goal would be to help people see the opportunity of creating enormous wealth by aligning the Popsicle Index and the S&P Index. Nothing affirms a good idea better than the banking and Harvard investment cartel giving their all to destroy it.

  34. FYI, Catherine. While people blather on about global warming impacting us within this century (if you believe the predictions), we have an ongoing massive disaster at Fukushima and not much comes from the MSM. I have noticed that many environmental organizations have been amazingly quiet, also. Maybe we need someone to say that Russia did it and then we could get some decent coverage.

    Chad

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyKkhI_GKkg

    1. I have never felt comfortable doing a Solari Report since there is such a wide range of opinion. My guess is that it is so bad, people are afraid to say anything.

    1. Good one. Trump and his team need to have their own war team. Only way to deal with something like this. I dealt with a team of 20 plus law firm and I saw the mess they could make. This machinery is much worse. At some point this is treason.

      1. I still think the greater risk is on the Republican side. Are we sure Brock is really entirely left?

        1. I agree with Dr. Roberts assessment that Trump declared war without having his troops (cabinet and sub-cabinet picks) assembled. He should have given the speech he gave this week at his inauguration, instead of the one that he did. I’m not being critical of him; the forces arrayed against him are enormous and amazingly ruthless and relentless.

          I would like him to invite you to lunch sometime.

          1. He needs to clean house at the FBI and DOJ pronto. There is way too much foot dragging going on to be just coincidence. The Awan brothers investigation or lack thereof is very stinky along with the Clinton Foundation and Weiner’s e-mails. With something like this, if there are not at least a few hundred agents tasked with investigating these cases, there is something wrong. Search warrants and subpoenas should be flying everywhere.

            I agree, treason is our biggest threat, not terrorism.

          3. The cabinent and subcabinet picks are there to run the agencies and MAGA. He needs a war team as well. Story of Nehemiah. When you rebuild a wall, you have to have a weapon in one hand and a tool in the other. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehemiah
            Always happy to answer the Administrations questions or be helpful where I can. However, I represent you, not the US government. I see my job as making sure you have the truth no matter what. That will always put me off sides with someone managing a centralized system.

Comments are closed.