Post your comments and questions for July, 2016.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

Similar Posts

71 Comments

  1. Hello Catherine;
    Reading about your trip made me think of a story I was told about healing journeys.
    When the ancient Greeks were physically, mentally or emotionally ill they made a pilgrimage to a sacred place called Epidaurus. Entrance to Epidaurus required a change of clothing. Wearing a white robe pilgrims pass through the an arch inscribed with the words “only the pure of heart may enter here”.
    The sick and dying went to Epidaurus for therapeia. The proscribed treatments included plays, music, dancing, good food, hot baths, massages and rest. Pilgrims were observers and performers in rituals and healing exercises. An individual might stay in the healing environment for several days or weeks.
    At some point the patient would go to a special hall where, for one night only, pilgrims share a common chamber. During the night attendants pass through the room blessing the sleepers. Using eucalyptus water they anoint the pilgrims. This libation prepares them for a visitation from the healer Asclepius It was believed that just before dawn, the god of healing would implant a healing dream in every pilgrim.
    The person who shared this myth with me also said all mental illness is spiritual. When the human soul is sick the arts will remedy and restore needed vitality.
    It sounds like your pilgrimage bought refreshment and renewal. I feel sure you also received a healing dream which you will share with the Solari community.
    I look forward to another year of inspired guidance from the Solari Report,
    Catherine Madden
    p.s, did you know Catherine means pure of heart ?

  2. Vets and Police.
    Catherine,
    Im not sure you have it correct on this or Im completely missing your point.
    Police all over are militarized. That is done. They were taken under the DHS and have also been trained by some “not so nice” folks from outside the US and they weren’t being trained to “Serve and protect”!
    Police ARE doing the bidding of those in control. Both local and federal, etc.
    We’re seeing police actions now what he didn’t prior. I believe this is part of why the LA riots happened.
    When they stop tazing pregnant women and old men
    When they stop flash banging infants in their cribs
    When they stop shooting people dead for no reason
    I’ll think about supporting them
    One last point – With many groups, you end up having a few who apologize for the bad behavior of the rest. Where is that for the cops? Where are the apologies from the “good cops”?? Where are the “good cops” who are speaking out against the bad ones? I see none! Not sure you can explain that away.

  3. Hi Catherine,
    I am new to your show and have heard you mention 3.0 areas to live vs. 2.0 areas. Do you have a list of these places with an explanation of their meaning? Currently, I am looking at various areas of the U.S. to relocate. Right now I am in Los Angeles. My preference would be to relocate approximately 1 hour to 2 hours outside of a major city with airport access. Regardless, I would love to access more information. Thank you for your time.

    1. Kate:

      My recommendation is to read the pdf for last three annual wrap ups as well as the 1st quarter 2014 and 2015 and 3rd quarter 2014 wrap ups. You can find all of these listed in the Wrap Up Library to your Resource Page.

      The 3rd Quarter 2014 Wrap Up specifically focuses on 3.0. However, I would start with the 2013 Wrap Up and go chronologically.

      Some of the cities positioned to benefit from the shift to 3.0:

      Portland
      Seattle
      San Francisco & Bay Area
      Austin
      Dallas
      Atlanta
      Salt Lake City
      Nashville
      Denver
      Boise

      As you are looking at the materials, send questions!

  4. Hi Catherine,

    So in Facebook news… (since you are not on FB)

    Today there was a live feed done by a man named Richard Greene interviewing a 13 year old genius physicist at the basement of the United Nations talking about Tesla technology and God.

    He gives his theories on god and energy but what I thought what was really fascinating that he wrote a children’s book explaining god. Watching the interview struck a nerve with me because it reminded me of the panel discussion from the Secret Space Program conference how physics is a religion. Here’s is this 13 year old “genius physicist” (the prophet) explaining god through science and technology (the revelation) at the UN (holy site/church).

    It gives me the creeps….

    I feel bad for the poor child who’s stupid hipster parent is going to buy and read this book to him/her.

    BTW, I don’t necessary disagree with his views of god. It’s the love of science and technology that’s giving me the creeps.

    I recorded the video from my screen. Here’s the link if it works. Otherwise if anyone is interested maybe google Richard Greene interviewing Maxwell Loughan at United Nations bookstore.

    /Users/najatmadry/Documents/Maxwell Loughan.mov

    All the best,

    Najat

  5. Catherine. Recently (posted on Youtube July 18, 2016), Amy Goodman of Democracy Now interviewed Dr. Cornel West, a Cornell University, a prominent Democrat Socialist, political philosopher, and theologian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornel_West)

    Interview link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6pN6x6pGwA
    Dr. West sat on the Democratic Convention Committee and argent supporter of Bernie Sanders. He has now switched parties and is behind Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party, who in his view represents hope, and a politics of decency. In this brief interview he lays out his rationale as to why Hillary Clinton is a very dangerous option, a neoliberal disaster, a promoter of chaos and regime change, and deliberate undermining of disaster relief efforts in Haiti. His hope was that through these elections America could finally retire the neoliberal agenda and move on to something higher. He reviews the neoliberal ‘disaster’ which has resulted in the conditions we have today at home and why so many people are backing Trump as a result of this. He also believes that Mr. Trump is a neo-fascist in the making and calls out the role of the media is creating is rise. He calls out politics today as the politics of fear which has driven the campaign process for decades. Dr. Green is not a spoiler in his mind. Finally, Dr. West calls for a return to a politics centered around humanity and decency, a politics of love.

  6. Money and Markets for 7/21.2016. i bring thiis up reluectrantly, because it may sound like I am being overly critical. I am not , but am trying to be helpful. Major portion of Money and Markets for 7/1/2016 came thru somewhat mushy, and gutteral. The Answer for Catherine Fitts came thru much more understandable and crisp. Is this just in the transmission and my reception? Your system people should be able to adjust this , if it is a real problem. If they find it is not a problem, fine, and thanks for your attention.

  7. Catherine, I was just looking through some past interviews and wondering, with all that’s going on now, do you plan to have Dmitry Orlov on anytime soon? He’s a great guest for his grounding in the day to day reality.

    Thanks for all you do. I love the Solari Report.

    1. I like Dimitry and have had him on once- he is the only guest I have ever had who pulled a no show. So I am a bit careful. He has some great material on building resilience and on explaining the Russian point of view after the ’90’s.

  8. Your USA Watchdog interview was very good — it was clear, succinct, transparent and gave quick short answers to some of the questions that the candidates and electorate should be considering. Have you considered publishing it in a small booklet that people could give to their friends, etc, as questions for voters to consider? The time is right, and there are not many short documents that provide a lot of short insightful answers to questions many people have not thought to ask.

  9. Your recommendation looks very interesting; I will check it out.

    I’m interested in all aspects of the subject. Certainly, understanding it and its relationship with political power is very important, but I also like to look at it from other points of view. If the guardians (i.e. police) had a full understanding of the subject, we probably would have less psychopaths who get hired as officers, less officers would be killed, operations and investigations would be more successful, and relations between police and society would be better.

    Dr. Robert Hare’s, “Without Conscience, the Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us”, is a good one.

    Stefan Verstappen has some interesting interviews on the subject on youtube from a layman’s perspective.

  10. Catherine,
    One of THE things that would stop so many bad things would be for all of us to understand psychopathy, figure out a way to stop it, and rehabilitate their enablers and victims. It sounds like you have already had encounters with a psychopath or two. Have you studied the subject much?

    Chad

  11. Catherine,
    I’m a little confused by your question. Dangerous to whom? Dangerous to an individual, the agency, and/or the country? Dangerous in what way? Also, to me, there is a distinction between a regulator and a law enforcement officer. The regulator is a civilian within a regulatory agency and the officer is in the enforcement section of the agency.

    I guess the short answer would be to follow good government guidelines like transparency, good hiring practices, strong ethics guidelines, enforcement of the law, legitimate accounting, etc. For instance, I am surprised at the number of agencies who have weak background investigations of their prospective employees. Many investigations are farmed out to contractors. How good are they? Do we want private entities with intimate knowledge of government employees? I don’t see that working out that well.

    We would also have to remove private money from our elections, except for a relatively small amount per person. If donating entity is not an actual living person, then there can not be a donation.

    Generally speaking, regulators, which includes the attorneys and technical personnel, should be paid well with good benefits, not be able to use the revolving door, and be punished severely, if they abuse their office. This especially goes for high level bureaucrats in agencies and judges.

    I don’t know all the answers and I’m not under an illusion that we can have a corruption free government agency, but we can certainly model the systems that appear to work. I haven’t done so, but perhaps looking at Portugal would be a good start or perhaps the states that have already legalized marijuana.

    Chad

    P.S. I think Martin Armstrong’s idea creating a Roman Tribune like position that would be empowered to investigate any higher level government official would be good for our government, in general. IGs within agencies should be given stronger powers. We should also have term limits and one and done restrictions on political positions.

  12. FYI, Catherine. So many people could have access to homemade pain killers (i.e. legal marijuana) if states granted legal access to plants that people could grow at home…..and they wouldn’t be subjecting themselves to highly addictive and dangerous opioids. Of course, this market would have to be highly regulated to minimize abuse, IMO.

    Chad

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/07/13/one-striking-chart-shows-why-pharma-companies-are-fighting-legal-marijuana/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_2_na

    1. How do you prevent the regulators from becoming more dangerous that the drugs?

      1. In some ways, I want this comment area to be like ZeroHedge where I can push the either like or dislike button. LOL! When you consider the pharmaceutical company insistence on addiction to THEIR drugs, I have always felt that there might be a year or so of ridiculous over-intake of marijuana, but after that silly period, the waistoids (who were already in that class) would remain there and others would shake themselves out of the “we haven’t done anything for months” situation. Much like becoming a widow and dealing with grief… at some point, and I have a lot of experience in this, you kick yourself and start doing something useful to society (let alone to yourself). Simply taking the huge profit out of the drugs and putting them in a taxable (TRANSPARENT) situation will benefit all. You won’t be smoking dope in the confines of your home with only your dealer knowing about it, everyone will. Digest that.

        BTW, here is another Netflix documentary to show what is happening in Colorado, especially as it relates to THC regulations… “High Profits”. Check it out.

        Jane

    1. Note all of these events follow immediately after the Turkish deal with Israel announced in Rome.

  14. Catherine,

    How do I see your full comments on each news article on the blog. I see the links to the articles and a few words or comments but not your full comment

    1. Brian:

      I don’t comment on the Top Picks website. The few notes you see are posted there as an identifier. I comment on the most important in Money & Markets which publishes late on Thursday evenings every week but the last week of the month. We post the notes to Money & Markets, so you can skim them to see what I mentioned or listen to the audio.

      Feel free to post any question on the Top Picks. Brad Eddins is our Top Picks editor. Scanning the news daily is a critical part of understanding the deeper trends that rolls up into the quarterly and annual wrap ups.

      Catherine

  15. Catherine,
    Here is an article that supports my earlier comments and addresses other aspects of policing that should be considered. I don’t necessarily agree with all of the comments, but the article is worthy of consideration.

    The drug war needs to be drastically scaled down or eliminated. If Portugal can do it, we can do it too or at least something like it. The drug war is probably THE key factor in causing the breakdown in relations between the police and and their respective communities. I’ve come to believe that the drug war is more about control and protecting the pharmaceutical cartel than anything else. To me, allowing alcohol to be legal and marijuana to be illegal has no basis in logic or science and I hope officers everywhere come to agree with LEAP. Please see the links below.

    http://www.leap.cc/

    Chad

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-13/too-many-laws-why-police-encounters-escalate

    1. Yes, I agree. However, the War on Drugs was used to build the legal and financial train tracks for the War on Terrorism. When you bring down one, you need to deal with the second.

  16. Catherine,
    I would add one thing to your list of actions and that is to grow a garden.

    Chad

    1. YES!!!!!!!!! Availability of nutritious food is going to increasingly be limited by higher and higher prices. Growing your own can be a good investment.

        1. Yes. Good advice. If you look at our crowdfunding Solari Report, I interview a entrepreneur with a neat system to make small batches of fermented foods.

      2. Meet Farm Bot…. http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/meet-farmbot-27762

        From someone who built, operated and practically lived in an organic garden center, this invention is over the top cool. At 66, I am not willing to bend over for 10 hours a day (any more)
        to insure that my plants are healthy and weed free… but this brilliant idea is worth the investigation. Only a few more days left to get their “best deal”. Hope you will consider including them in your food (AKA sustainability) features!

        (BTW, you see it comes from the website, forbiddenknoawledgetv… thanks to Dark Journalist, another site worth perusing during the day/week).

        Jane

  17. Catherine,
    Looks like the iceberg of corruption may include Comey. The cancer of corruption is probably so big now that to try to kill it would kill the probably kill the government. It’s interesting how the same people keep getting recycled to keep the corrupt game going.

    Chad

    http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/07/13/fbi-director-comey-board-member-of-clinton-foundation-connected-bank-hsbc/

    https://investmentwatchblog.com/fbi-director-comey-is-a-board-member-of-clinton-foundation-connected-bank-hsbc/

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262389/comey-clintons-and-clemency-lloyd-billingsley

    1. I would point out that he refused George W. Bush’s order during the Ashcroft hospital incident and this time around documented in his announcement and testimony enough findings to prove that Clinton lied to Congress, leaving it easily available for the American voters to act, let alone Congress to prosecute.

      1. Of course, you’re right. His actions at the hospital were admirable and he did present enough evidence to hurt Hillary, but it came at an extremely high price, perhaps a price that was too high. I’ll reserve my final assessment when I see what happens regarding Hillary’s lies to Congress and the malfeasance at the Clinton Foundation during her time at the state department. If he makes the right choices, he may become the greatest FBI director ever; if he doesn’t, he could go down in infamy.

        1. I am not saying he did the right thing. His big problem IMO was that his boss briefed B. Clinton on what H. Clinton had to do to skate the interview…and for all we know provided a list of names of witnesses that had to be “deleted.” IMO, the Bilderbergers ordered that Clinton would be the nominee. We have dueling governance systems.

          1. With the Koch Brothers switching to Clinton, this will be more than a little interesting. The DNC Convention is not going to go well with Sanders supporters pissed to the point of creating a scene. As you point out, Catherine, this could be a challenge to the Bilderbergers and while they might have ordered it, this could be a first for people too pissed to simply let the fake election ride.

  18. Catherine,
    Here are a few comments regarding policing in the U.S. Is it any wonder that we have an increasing militarization of the police when our politicians and the citizenry buy into/support the WAR on drugs, the WAR on poverty, the WAR on this, that, and the other thing? What people are supporting is a war against themselves. Virtually everyone in the country knows someone who does or has done drugs, legal and illegal. The police are GUARDIANS, not warriors and everyone desperately needs to realize this difference. (As a slight aside, words matter and yet you see politicians, the media, and many others purposely misusing words constantly to deceive others. This seems to be straight out of the Ministry of Truth from 1984).
    I get a little irritated when people quote some statistics about how police officers deaths are down and then infer or say that we shouldn’t partake of the hero worship of officers, because of this statistical trend. First of all, no officer I know wants to be worshiped as a hero; they simply want understanding and some level of respect. And often the officers who do heroic things just say that they were just doing their job. Do the people who come up with the don’t worship police meme consider that the art and science of policing has evolved since the 70s and that this evolution is at least partly responsible for the reduction in police officer shootings and assaults? For instance, officers in two person patrols are less likely to be assaulted than one person patrols and many police unions have pushed agencies to have two person patrols.
    Do these people realize the incredible amount of stress that officers can be subjected to on a routine basis, depending on where they serve? Do they know how many officers have serious health problems by the time that they retire? Do they know that some officers suffer from PTSD and that about 125 officers commit suicide every year? Do these people think that it is the psychopathic officers who are committing suicide (Yes, unfortunately, there are some psychopathic officers out there)? No, it’s often good people who have been driven to the edge and don’t have proper coping skills or access to adequate help. Do these people realize that police officers as a whole defuse numerous volatile situations every day so that nobody gets hurt?
    Do these people realize that an officer cannot lose a fight, because if he/she does, his/her opponent now has access to the officer’s gun, which could immediately endanger others? How many of the people shot by officers are fighting with the officers and attempting to get the officer’s gun? I would encourage people to go on youtube and search for officer shot during traffic stop and see how many videos come up (97,600 as of today).
    The vast majority of the officers I know are for the second amendment and are not in favor of more gun control, including myself. Yes, some officers do want more gun control, but most of them are in urban areas where gang and drug activity are out of control. Do the people mentioned above realize that the majority of officers are not supportive of Obama’s gun control proposals?

    http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/p1_gunsurveysummary_2013.pdf

    The police can only do so much and they are constantly being asked to do things that are not really police functions and that leads to the police being disliked more and more, because the police don’t really belong there. The vast majority of the time, government is reactive and it is someone (or a group of people) who asks for government intervention, in this case, the police. Well, these people who ask for the police better have a very good understanding of what the police are, before they ask for intervention. They often should be asking the government for something else and/or taking responsibilities for themselves. For instance, the fact that we have so many police officers in schools is indicative of severe problems within the family unit and the administration of our schools. A bedrock of society is a functioning family unit; everything else grows from there.
    Furthermore, when people want some new law, they should realize that the police will be forced to enforce it, whether the police want to or not. That is the police’s function and people should not be upset with the police for enforcing a law that they don’t like. They should be mad at the politicians who voted for it and/or their fellow citizens who requested it.
    Police are under pressure to write tickets and seize assets to make up for budget shortfalls. This pressure comes from the top and there are citizens out there that are fine with this…….until it’s them who gets ticketed. These are just two more examples of the police function being perverted by various actors, some of whom are well-intentioned, but who are misguided. People need to stop asking the police to address nearly everything that is wrong with our society, which dilutes from one of their main duties, which is to apprehend the predators in our society.
    And yes, there does need to be improvements within policing regarding hiring practices, training, and operating procedures and increased accountability. We all have room for improvement. Some of this improvement is related to what you brought up and it is poor policies and programs that often originate with the federal government that need to be eliminated or modified. But, this police vs. society meme is just another dialectic meant to keep the general populace fighting one another. What people need to focus on is the massive criminality/corruption occurring at the top and the constant changing of the rules of the game to benefit the very few at the expense of the many. The police cannot function without the support of a community and the community cannot survive without the police, unless they want to live under the rule of the jungle and not the rule of law, which, again, points to the near lawlessness at the very top of our society.
    Lastly, referring to the police as “popos” is part and parcel of the problem of a lack of proper respect for the function that the police have in society and the individuals who are in police service. Again, words matter.

    What happens to a society that starts to stone the keepers (guardians) at the gate?

    https://books.google.com/books?id=-mPbVYM_HQoC&pg=PA13&lpg=PA13&dq=stoning+the+guardians+at+the+gate&source=bl&ots=YqlV8ACY3q&sig=HEyfPy8ghsQbc-oeErzzsW-luc4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNj5mM6PDNAhUrBsAKHQC9C-8Q6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=stoning%20the%20guardians%20at%20the%20gate&f=false

    Chad

    P.S. One of my spiritual teachers told me the following, “Where there is no love, there is law.” We need more of the former and less of the latter.

    1. Chad:

      Great comments. IMO the vast majority of Americans have good thoughts about and support their local police. There is currently millions if not billions pouring into sabotaging the policy as an effort to centralize local control. Police are in the squeeze between out economic dependency on war and organized crime and our need to pretend we are lawful. They are in the squeeze between all the divide and conquers. They are in the squeeze of the slow burn and household inflation. They are in the crosshairs of centralizing local control. The goal is for the local constituencies to not see their natural allies and organize. Which is what we need to do. But you have to organize locally with the people who are willing to take responsibility and push the red button and can remain grounded despite the entrainment. That ain’t everyone.

  19. Comment regarding recent posting of “Journal of Practical Ethics A Journal of Philosophy, Applied to the Real World Going Viral: Vaccines, Free Speech, and the Harm Principle, Oxford Uehiro Prize in Practical Ethics 2014-15
    Catherine. This article is worthy of continued strategic discussions with our Solari audience. Vaccine safety is NOT, nor ever should be a settled matter. While I am a scientist and not an attorney, in my opinion, what is suggested here is in complete violation of our human rights, personal right to protect oneself or property, and completely against the scientific method. This has no basis under the US system of governance.
    This important foundational article gives the public a glimpse of very real global discussions and scenarios that are being deliberated to ensure high vaccine coverage for existing vaccine and new vaccines introduced to the public with minimal resistence at a later date. To me this suggests a new tactic of ongoing efforts formulate policy and law that further shields very probable government sanctioned killing or injury for the ‘public good’. (And of course processes for releasing legal liability for industry and service delivery providers of vaccines). It does go without saying that the dilemma posed is the risk and harm of not vaccinating against certain diseases as good public health policy and risk to especially vulnerable populations. This is not an easy situation and this understanding must be respected as well. Yet, the continued efforts to downplay vaccine safety, especially at a level of public discourse is unethical, immoral, and also, I believe, against the law. Discussions on the risks of vaccination MUST always continue by public officials, the scientific community, public interest groups and global advisory committees. I am intentionally leaving out industry because I believe that it is WE the people and our democratically elected governments who should and MUST take back the power as consumers to dictate the terms.
    Vaccine safety is NOT a settled matter. By their own admission, CDC, NIH, FDA, WHO, and pharmaceutical industry readily acknowledge that no vaccine is 100% safe which is evidenced in various ways. Some of these include: 1) the numerous court settled vaccine damage compensation cases in the US and UK and the presence of the Vaccine Compensation Fund, 2) the amass of scientifically reviewed articles and published books that continue to demonstrate that the ‘science is simply not settled’ on vaccine safety and risk vs benefit – this also includes the periodic National Institute of Medicine scientific reviews on vaccine safety, risk and warnings of adverse events; ; 3) the black box labels on vaccine vials warning practitioners and the public of rare yet real adverse events; 4) the ongoing global policy, and various philosophical/ethical debates on basic human rights and who owns our bodies with the ever increasing ‘for the greater public good’ argument being used to introduce new technologies and policies, and 5) reports from the ongoing work of WHO’s Global Advisory Committee and SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group of Experts) who review new vaccines, deliberate their safety and set policy directives globally. For example, in the 1990’s, WHO’s SAGE committee has had in their scope critical discussions with private industry and NGOs on the impact of vaccine adverse events on immunization coverage. With new vaccine initiatives. (GPV-CVI/SAGE.98/WP.08)
    WHO’s Vaccine Safety Committee explicitly states that “There is no such thing as a perfect vaccine which protects everyone who receives it AND is entirely safe for everyone” and then offer conditions and guidelines for monitoring vaccine safety and responding to adverse events when they do occur (http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/detection/AEFI/en/) . This is especially critical in light of the fact that no longitudinal studies are in place to systematically monitor the long term negative effects of accumulative vaccinations on populations. This is well understood in the Pharmaco-vigilence and environmental health scientific communities.

    Moreover, disturbing in my mind is the question of who gets to shape the discourse on these very real and significant outstanding issues if dissent is shut down as put forth in this article. At risk is the crumbling of a fundamental pillar of an open democratic society through suppression of dissent. Here individual liberties are at stake and an individual’s right to protect himself and his property (our own body) is guaranteed in our constitution.

    Finally, equally as disturbing is that the scientific method itself is in serious jeopardy of being shut down. The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.” (Wikipedia definition) As a research scientist, I can say this last point, ‘correcting and integrating previous knowledge’, is so vital to the scientific method. As new technology advances, new scientific knowledge, research methods, and techniques become available, we must be able to, in a politically neutral climate, identify and correct those medical practices or public health policies which ultimately cause us harm as individuals and at a population level. Scientists must be able to operate under conditions where inquiry can be unimpeded. Our personal liberties, our health and public safety depends on this. We have so many examples historically where this did not occur. In sum, the science of vaccine safety is NOT settled.

    Respectfully submitted, AB

      1. Thanks, Allison. I posted because IMO it is a significant trial balloon.

  20. Hi Catherine,

    I like to share with an incredible experience of healing that is not very common.

    For the past few years I have been dealing with strange symptoms that was making me really sick. I am very much into alternative healing and medicine tried a lot of different therapies and nothing worked.
    It got so bad I said to myself, that’s it I’m going to a doctor. Went in and out of doctors offices for 3 years and nothing. They didn’t find anything wrong with me. Until one day a friend suggested I take a lyme disease
    test. When I reviewed the symptoms for lyme, I had pretty much all of the symptoms. I took the test and in order to be clinically diagnosed with lyme the test comprises of 10 bands of bacteria and a patient
    needs to be tested positive for 5 out of 10 bands. I got 2 out of 10. I had a jerk of a doctor who instantly ruled out lyme. I was pretty much on my own to figure my health out. There are a lot controversies around lyme disease.
    Different practitioners dispute the tests. There are specialized doctors called lyme literate doctors that charge an obscene about of money for a visit and of course it’s not covered by insurance.

    So I dug into the internet and found this therapy called apitherapy aka bee venom therapy, simply put being stung by bees. These little creatures have some magical healing properties. There are many healing components to the
    venom including 50 unknown components that scientists haven’t figured out. The venom tiggers the body’s healing response acting out as an anti-immflamtory, anti-viral, antibacterial, and much more. Since doing the therapy, it has changed my life.
    It’s still a working in progress with huge steps in the right direction. I feel like I’m getting my health and life back.

    There are other things that I’ve noticed that have been happening. I listened to Jay D’s show on I think transhumanism, you posted the link on Solari. The guest he had on talked about radiation from wifi and how it was internally crystallizing our bodies.
    For the last 6 years I’ve been working from home with a wifi router right on top of me. After hearing the show, I decided to take a break from wifi. One day after my therapy, in the middle of the night, (I swear my life I felt this happen) I had a sensation of razor
    blades moving through the side of my neck. It was weird. It made me think, most therapies might not work if there is some kind of calcification happening inside the body. Maybe the road to healing is to some how decalcify the body first in order for organs to do their part in the healing process.

    The reality is there are so many external factors that are simply making people sick. I feel like I am constantly under attack. Thank god for therapies like this one that lead to a path of healing. I do have to admit I have been hesitant to share this story
    publicly for fear of some kind of crazy regulation banning it. I thought more about it, what can the government do stop people getting stung by bees…? Also, I need to include taking other elements of the bee like propolis, bee pollen, and royal jelly are necessary for the successful of the therapy.

    Another plus, the bee venom increases the dopamine in the brain so I’m constantly in a good mood! It explains why they are trying o kill off the bees. They are so vital our eco-system.

    I hope sharing this story will help others who are struggling with their health. It’s the worst position a person can be put in. I hope someone in the Solari community benefits from it.

    All the best,
    Najat

    1. The police and the general population are being squeezed by covert operations designed in this case:

      1. To get the mess in DC off the front page
      2. Militarize the police
      3. Achieve gun control

      Actions we should take:

      1. Turn off/throw out TVs and corporate media
      2. Get to know our local Sheriff and police chief – determine what we can do to support them and support efforts to reduce crime in our local areas
      3. Turn off all coverage of presidential elections – learn about and support excellent candidates for local office – learn the issues
      4. Get trained and licensed to use and carry a firearm
      5. Educate yourself about creating immunity to entrainment and mind control technology
      6. Stay coherent – develop strategies to stay coherent when those around you are not
      7. Remove from your life people who are easily manipulated and get and stay angry in response to entrainment
      8. Pray for your community
      9. Communicate with your Congressional and Senate offices that you adamantly oppose gun control and militarization of the police.
      10. Lobby your mayor and sheriff to remove federal enforcement funds from your area; stop accepting them and being subjected to the related invasion of local authorities
      11. Stop asset forfeiture in your area, including federal adoptions

      1. “‘124 Police Officers Were Killed In The U.S. Last Year’

        Some more facts that don’t match the hero narrative. Police deaths while on duty are on pace to be at a record low in 2016, down 60% from the peak in 1974. Gun related homicides are also trending towards the lowest levels since 1900. In 1991 there were 24,700 homicides in the U.S.

        Last year there were just over 16,000 homicides, down 35% while the population grew by 26%. The number of guns owned by American citizens has tripled since 1991.

        Does this match the anti-gun narrative of the left and the popos? Does the government want to confiscate our guns because of crime or because they are worried we will use them against a tyrannical establishment? The militarization of police forces isn’t to protect us.

        It’s to protect them from us.”
        http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-11/124-police-officers-were-killed-us-last-year

      2. “‘Don’t Just Blame the Cops: Who Is Responsible for America’s Killing Fields?’

        By John W. Whitehead
        July 11, 2016

        “I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today: my own government. For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent.”—Martin Luther King Jr. …”

        https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/dont_just_blame_the_cops_who_is_responsible_for_americas_killing_fields

        1. “In researching this subject for a book, a few things have become clear. One is that unless there’s video, or multiple witnesses, there’s usually no consequence at all for police violence, not even on the civil side. The overwhelming majority of incidents simply disappear.”

          ‘In Police Violence Cases, Time Works Against Justice’ By Matt Taibbi
          http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/in-police-violence-cases-time-works-against-justice-20160713

  23. Wow!!! Thank you Catherine and Dr. Farrell
    Finally an explanation on Brexit that makes sense. Brilliantly explained. Impressive!

  25. P.P.S. And if there was one group in the upper crust that I would pin a lot of the blame on, it’s the attorneys.

    1. Chad:

      Make sure you watch the Infowars video we posted about Dallas. He is right about gladio and why police are the target. Good info for you to have.

      Catherine

    1. For my second divorce, I asked my attorney how much I would have to pay in the worst case. I then offered my husband $1 more, then I refused to fight. I balked only one occasion – when he insisted on keeping my family silver. But rather than involving the courts, I simply went back over to my co-op and took my family silver.

      I had to sign waivers on 4 occasions, relieving my attorney of any liability because I refused to fight. My theory was that I could make more money focusing on my business than fighting. I kept sending my husband clients (he was a successful attorney). I kept any dirt I had to myself. Finally the carrots worked. He signed a settlement.

      I never had children because I could never figure out how someone with my background could protect them and make them safe. The secret societies and private financial interests could always get to the husband, the boyfriend…

      1. Catherine,
        I have to say that you’ve been through quite a few hard knocks to get where you are. I’m sorry that you’ve had to go through all of this turmoil in your life. However, perhaps that was needed to get you to have the perspective and knowledge that you have now. I can sincerely say that your blog has been instrumental in my “awakening”, if that is the proper term, and I’m grateful for your efforts. When I started my career, I was naive about may things.
        For some time now, I’ve come to believe that our country is in the state that it is in (at least in part), because the upper crust of society has failed to live up to their responsibilities that go along with their privilege. They seem to have been overrun with nihilists and very selfish, arrogant (and in some cases, amazingly ignorant) people, never mind a sense of lawlessness within the class. I often wonder if they are the victims of their own system that they have perpetuated that feeds them poison. It would be very difficult or nearly impossible for Mr. Global to do what he wants without the acquiescence of the upper crust. To me, it’s something similar to many of the investors that got bilked by Madoff (I.e. a pseudo Mr. Global). These investors knew that his returns were impossible and there must have been something illegal going on, but they stayed in anyway, because they thought that it would be someone else who got screwed. Well, the upper crust seems to have this point of view on a great many things and it’s just a matter of time before they get screwed like so many of the people in the lower classes.
        It would appear that you are one of the few that have traveled in those circles and have opted out. You, along with others who have a pedigree similar to yours, and are willing to challenge our wayward system deserve much praise. For the rest of the upper crust, they are preparing a garden that will provide them with many bitter fruits in this lifetime or the next.

        Chad

        P.S. I don’t think that the vast majority of people really understand what it means when they get a marriage license. They first should have a full understanding of what a license is and what it entails.

        1. Chad:

          I never believed I had any other choice than to work within the system. For example, read this: https://solari.com/blog/meditation-at-the-crossroads/
          I left because in the process of trying to find real solutions – which I believed the leadership supported me in figuring out – I became convinced that the US leadership was headed for failure and that my personal choice was one of embracing a wealthy form of slavery in which I would be part of a system committing genocide against productive, honorable people, including people in my family, or trying to find a winning pathway in the wilderness where I would be free or dead.

          Inotherwords, when faced with the ultimate choice, I found myself in a Spartacus moment – I chose freedom even if it meant death. I thought the odds of making it were small and on numerous occasions was sure I would not live another 1-5 minutes. So one of the reasons that my life is a happy one is that I seem to have made friends with death. I also decided that it was more important to have the capacity to love when I won then to just win. It made things more complicated. However, it is hard to fight effectively when the person you loved and were intensely loyal to has ordered your destruction and the theft of your resources and your name.

          I have no complaints, so please do not think of this as whining. I have absolutely no use for whiners. The way to find out “how the money works” is by working within our economy and society at ALL levels – top to bottom – and experiencing the betrayals – 1,000’s of betrayals – one at a time, and then on each one following the money trail back to the source.

          It is remarkable and why I am always quoting my former pastor: If we can face it, God can fix it.

          I am very happy to hear that the Solari Report is helping you. I am totally energized by each person who I can help shift to ever greater levels of personal freedom and power.

          Makes my day!

      2. !!!
        The Red Button Theory in the context of modern-day so-called marriage contracts!?!
        Holy Cow!!
        This thread could get totally out of hand.
        Still, any crazy rich stories we may offer should also acknowledge that we ask for trouble when we don’t heed Genesis 3 as a life lesson rather than mere allegory.

        1. Jim:

          🙂

          The red button hypocrisy threads through all aspects of our personal, intimate lives. That is what the “coming clean” piece is all about — getting the red button hypocrisy out of your personal life.

          Catherine

          1. Wow Catherine –
            I hope your subscribers have read your “Meditation at the Crossroads” blog. I had not, until just now. Seriously amazing. I love your Mom!!
            I assume that blog is also the “coming clean” piece you referenced above.
            My mom had a sort of mirror experience to your mom’s. She grew up in Rye, NY with the Bushes and other high flyers.
            Ironically, her best childhood friend was a outcast gal named Barbara Pierce, the illegitimate daughter of Marvin & Pauline Pierce. Marvin was the the prestigious – but seriously underpaid – publisher of McCall’s Magazine. Apparently, his wife Pauline ran off to a European proto-hippie drugs cum sex camp to escape her keeping-up-with-the-Jones frustrations … only to return awhile later a few months pregnant with Barbara.
            Understandably, the Pierce family wanted nothing to do with young Barbara.
            Sooo … by necessity Barbara grew to become an ingenious con-artist. Which, of course for my sheltered little rich girl future mom, was the absolute spice of life. She loved all of Barbara’s tricks and pranks and daring-do.
            When my mom was dying of cancer, I used to ask her questions like, “Mom, you grew up with these monsters … how did they do this to us?”
            Invariably (in a non-judgmental way), she would respond something like “Everything that happens, happens because Barbara wants it to happen.” In other words, for my mom who really knew all the elite creeps well, Barbara was the hidden hand behind everything.
            Even stranger, my Mom really held Barbara in awe as an unparalleled – for better or worse – force of nature.
            I provide this anecdote only because all this history that Catherine and others are unwinding is complex. For me, it speaks mostly to our human frailty, our need to face it, and ultimately to summon God’s help for strength.

  27. Catherine,
    I’m going to speculate that Hillary was not recommended to be charged by the FBI and probably will not be, because she is just the tip of a large iceberg of corruption inside and outside the country. There must have been all sorts of people who knew something was amiss and a smaller number of people who were directly in on it. What is not being talked about as much as it should be is the potential corrupting of her office to get “donations” to her foundation. I would bet that these donations would implicate all sorts of people and for diplomatic and “national security” reasons (and we can’t forget the huge political reasons), she will walk free. There are so many things wrong with this case on so many levels. As a law enforcement officer, I find this whole scenario to be a travesty of a mockery of a sham and it reflects very poorly on the FBI, the DOJ, and our country. I wonder how many FBI agents are walking around in a daze trying to figure out what happened. Tens of thousands of man hours and millions of dollars down the drain in a blink of an eye. The evidence of Hillary’s crimes is certainly enough to indict her for at least some crimes; its just a question of what crimes.
    However, what is far more concerning is the number of people who said that they would continue to support her even if she was indicted! It’s crazy. This reminds me of your red button story where people refused to push the button to stop the corruption. It’s sad, but apparently that old saying that people get the government that they deserve is correct.

    Chad

    P.S. I wonder what the NSA was doing when Hillary was using her server and non-government e-mail address?

    1. Chad:

      Agree. Lots of money flowing to the “right” places.

      Unfortunately, the technology is going to make more and more people behave in ways that do not appear logical or human:

      https://solari.com/blog/entrainment-subliminal-programming-and-financial-manipulation/
      https://solari.com/blog/the-kingsman-campaign/

      The Red Button challenge is clearly in the mix as well.

      Your comment is a reminder to put the FBI agents and law enforcement officers in my prayers. On the line when you are under such leadership is a very scary place to be.

      Catherine

  28. “[CAF Note: IMO, we are watching multiple felonies being committed by the Attorney General, the Clintons and possibly their attorneys and staff members, not to mention the President. The lawlessness embodied in the process is exceptional.]

    July 1, 2016

    Dear President Obama:

    The Attorney General of the United States just met in private with the target and husband of a target of an FBI criminal investigation. She should be fired.

    If there is no law, we have no currency and no country.

    Best Regards,

    Catherine Austin Fitts”

    I could not agree more, Catherine. It is with great irony that the FBI announced this final travesty of justice that Hillary will not be charged with a crime one day after we were supposedly celebrating our Independence Day. It is a black day in this Republic and a signal to the complete end game of sovereignty as we have known it in our boomer lifetime. Like you say, no rule of law, no country.

    The question now is, do I stay in this country, something I have NEVER considered in the past, or contemplate becoming an ex-patriot in some other realm. As crazy as it sounds, Russia is not off the list. At least they have made the commitment to clean food… with British elites leaving the UK like rats from a sinking ship, I think there might be a lot of competition for a “better place”.

    This comes after your latest Dark Journalist interview which was inspiring if for no other reason than to show that CAF, again, has predicted our future. If a miracle happens and the elections are rigged against Hillary (if for no other reason than to prevent secession… like Texas, for example) then we are still ruled by a monumentally self-absorbed personality but maybe one that could keep the Constitution as in tact as it currently stands. Your point about a Constitutional Convention must be shouted from the mountain tops… NO ability for the progressives to rewrite the Constitution. NO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION!

    If Hillary wins, it will be a mute point as the SC Justices she appoints will destroy this country forever.

    Jane

    1. Jane:

      The next four months is going to be very interesting. If you are in a good county with a good Sheriff in Texas you are still relatively safe. I think it is important to be resilient and to have options. Unfortunately, when governance is rotten, the risk is everywhere. Clearly, however, there are countries where the culture is more human than the US and costs are much lower.

      Catherine

      1. Funny… I always joke about moot point (saying mute instead) and just realized I put it in the last sentence! I think it will be wise to try to find anything to smile about as we venture into the future. I think it is time to have a sit down with members of my community and hope that other Solari members will do the same where they live. Thanks, as always, for all that you do, Catherine.

  29. Every interview in June was a home run. I thought Dr. Dady Chary was an inspiration. Thank you for bringing these wonderful courageous people to our attention.

    1. Thanks, Catherine! High praise coming from you. It means a lot. The world is full of wonderful courageous people. As we pay attention to them and ignore, shun and cut off the people draining us, we get somewhere!

  30. You might want to add the URL below to your
    Collection Cup: Building a List of Best Sources on Vaccine Risks

    The Exploding Autoimmune Epidemic – Dr. Tent – It’s Not Autoimmune, you have Viruses https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8FCJ_VPyns

    First half covers history of how vaccines came about, the second half discussing what is in vaccines and all the health problems which can result .

Comments are closed.